Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Donor side effects experienced under minimal controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with in vitro maturation (IVM) versus conventional COS for in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment

Maria Marchante, Ferran Barrachina, Sabrina Piechota, Marta Fernandez-González, Alexa Giovannini, Trozalla Smith, Simone Kats, Bruna Paulsen, Eva González, Virginia Calvente, Ana Silvan, Baruch Abittan, Joshua Klein, Peter Klatsky, Daniel Ordonez, Christian C. Kramme
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.28.24304995
Maria Marchante
1Gameto Inc., New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ferran Barrachina
1Gameto Inc., New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sabrina Piechota
1Gameto Inc., New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marta Fernandez-González
1Gameto Inc., New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexa Giovannini
1Gameto Inc., New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Trozalla Smith
2Spring Fertility, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simone Kats
1Gameto Inc., New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruna Paulsen
1Gameto Inc., New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eva González
3Ruber Juan Bravo University Hospital, Eugin Group, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Virginia Calvente
3Ruber Juan Bravo University Hospital, Eugin Group, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ana Silvan
3Ruber Juan Bravo University Hospital, Eugin Group, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Baruch Abittan
4Extend Fertility, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua Klein
4Extend Fertility, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Klatsky
2Spring Fertility, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Ordonez
3Ruber Juan Bravo University Hospital, Eugin Group, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian C. Kramme
1Gameto Inc., New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: christian{at}gametogen.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate how minimal controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for in vitro maturation (IVM) affects subjects’ oocyte retrieval experiences compared to conventional COS, considering side effects

Design Retrospective Survey Study

Setting Clinical in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment centers in Spain and the United States.

Subjects Data were collected from subjects undergoing minimal COS (n=110; 600-800 IU FSH) for IVM and conventional COS for egg donation (n=48; 2000-3000 IU FSH) from April 2022 to November 2023. In the same period, a pairwise comparison of subjects (n=13) undergoing both minimal COS for IVM and conventional COS for oocyte cryopreservation was conducted.

Intervention/Exposure Minimal and conventional controlled ovarian stimulation.

Main Outcome Measures The most common side effects suffered during ovarian stimulation and after OPU, satisfaction level, and the likelihood of recommending or repeating minimal or conventional COS. Statistical analysis included Mann Whitney, Wilcoxon, Chi-square, and McNemar tests, with a significance level set at p<0.05.

Results During minimal COS, most subjects did not experience breast swelling (86%), pelvic or abdominal pain (76%), nausea or vomiting (96%), and bleeding (96%). After oocyte pick-up, the majority (75%) reported no pelvic or abdominal pain. The most common side effect was abdominal swelling (52%). Compared to conventional COS cycles, minimal COS subjects reported significantly less post-retrieval pain, with 33% experiencing no pain (vs. 6%; p=0.0011) and with a reduced severe level of pain (5% vs.19%; p=0.0097), leading to fewer subjects requiring pain medication (25% vs. 54%; p=0.0003). Additionally, 85% of women were very satisfied with minimal stimulation and would recommend or repeat the treatment. In the comparison in which each donor underwent both minimal and conventional COS treatments, women indicated more side effects with the conventional stimulation, presenting a significantly overall higher level of pain (p=0.0078).

Conclusion Reducing the hormonal dose for ovarian stimulation has a beneficial effect on subjects, suggesting the combination of minimal COS with IVM techniques is a well-tolerated alternative for women who cannot or do not wish to undergo conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Competing Interest Statement

Disclosure Statement: A.G., B.P., T.S., C.C.K., F.B., M.M., S.P., and M.-J.F.-G. are shareholders in the for-profit biotechnology company Gameto Inc. C.C.K., S.P., M.M., A.G., B.P., are listed on a patent covering the use of OSCs for IVM: U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/492,210. Additionally, C.C.K. is listed on three patents covering the use of OSCs for IVM: U.S. Patent Application No. 17/846,725, U.S Patent Application No. 17/846,845, and International Patent Application No.: PCT/ US2023/026012. C.C.K., is additionally listed on three patents for the transcription factor-directed production of granulosa-like cells from stem cells: International Patent Application No.: PCT/US2023/065140, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/ 326,640, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/444,108. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding Statement

Funding Statement: This work was funded by the for-profit entity Gameto Inc. and no other grant or funding agency.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Data was retrospectively collected from research subjects who underwent minimal COS or conventional COS between April 2022 and November 2023 at Ruber Juan Bravo University Hospital, Eugin Group (Madrid, Spain), Spring Fertility (New York, USA), and Extend Fertility (New York, USA) with informed consent and ethical approval from CNRHA 47/428973.9/22 (Spain) and Western IRB No. 20225832 (USA), respectively. This research adhered to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Funding Statement: This work was funded by the for-profit entity Gameto Inc. and no other grant or funding agency.

  • Disclosure Statement: A.G., B.P., T.S., C.C.K., F.B., M.M., S.P., and M.-J.F.-G. are shareholders in the for-profit biotechnology company Gameto Inc. C.C.K., S.P., M.M., A.G., B.P., are listed on a patent covering the use of OSCs for IVM: U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/492,210. Additionally, C.C.K. is listed on three patents covering the use of OSCs for IVM: U.S. Patent Application No. 17/846,725, U.S Patent Application No. 17/846,845, and International Patent Application No.: PCT/ US2023/026012. C.C.K., is additionally listed on three patents for the transcription factor-directed production of granulosa-like cells from stem cells: International Patent Application No.: PCT/US2023/065140, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/ 326,640, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/444,108. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

  • Attestation Statement: The subjects in this study have not concomitantly been involved in other randomized trials. Data regarding any of the subjects in the study has not been previously published unless specified. Data will be made available to the editors of the journal for review or query upon request.

  • Data Sharing Statement: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and supplementary tables and figures.

Data Availability

Data Sharing Statement: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and supplementary tables and figures.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 28, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Donor side effects experienced under minimal controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with in vitro maturation (IVM) versus conventional COS for in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Donor side effects experienced under minimal controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with in vitro maturation (IVM) versus conventional COS for in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment
Maria Marchante, Ferran Barrachina, Sabrina Piechota, Marta Fernandez-González, Alexa Giovannini, Trozalla Smith, Simone Kats, Bruna Paulsen, Eva González, Virginia Calvente, Ana Silvan, Baruch Abittan, Joshua Klein, Peter Klatsky, Daniel Ordonez, Christian C. Kramme
medRxiv 2024.03.28.24304995; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.28.24304995
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Donor side effects experienced under minimal controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with in vitro maturation (IVM) versus conventional COS for in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment
Maria Marchante, Ferran Barrachina, Sabrina Piechota, Marta Fernandez-González, Alexa Giovannini, Trozalla Smith, Simone Kats, Bruna Paulsen, Eva González, Virginia Calvente, Ana Silvan, Baruch Abittan, Joshua Klein, Peter Klatsky, Daniel Ordonez, Christian C. Kramme
medRxiv 2024.03.28.24304995; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.28.24304995

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)