Abstract
Introduction For patients presenting to the Emergency room or OPD with acute severe right iliac fossa pain, the clinicians mostly prefer acute appendicitis as the first diagnosis, though many other differential diagnoses are there. Usually, in ER or OPD, clinical scores such as Alvarado Score, Ripasa scoring, and Tzanakis Scoring to diagnose Acute appendicitis. All these scores have different overlapping parameters and variable amounts of weightage. It is important to understand how sensitive and specific these scores are to determine the most accurate score to accurately diagnose acute appendicitis.
Objectives Determine the Diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado Scoring, Ripasa Scoring, and Tzanakis Scoring compared to the Gold Standard Histopathology report.
Methodology A Retrospective observational design was formulated where data of patients coming to the ER and OPD of the affiliated tertiary care hospital with right iliac fossa pain were enrolled. From the data, all clinical scores were calculated as per the standard guideline and the results of the scores were correlated with the gold standard Intraoperative Surgeon’s opinion and the patient’s histopathological report to determine the sensitivity, specificity, Youden Index and Accuracy of all the scores. Statistical software like EXCEL and SPSS along with Medcalc was used to produce the ROC Curve (Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve) & AUC of ROC and Fagan’s Nomogram.
Results A total of 237 patients were enrolled who presented with right iliac fossa pain of which 156 were confirmed from the Histopathology report as patients with Acute Appendicitis. The Sensitivity was calculated for Alvarado (0.487), Ripasa (0.641), and Tzanakis(0.8269) whereas the Calculated Specificity was for Alvarado(0.8148), Ripasa(0.8395), Tzanakis(0.9699). The Younden Index was highest for Tzanakis score at 0.7968.
Conclusion The Tzanakis Score is the most accurate Scoring method to diagnose Acute Appendicitis in patients presenting with RIF pain as it includes Ultrasonography. When USG is not available, the Ripasa score is the best scoring method while we do not recommend the use of Alvarado scoring due to poor sensitivity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of Shrimati Nathiba Hargovandas Lakhmichand Municipal Medical College gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Email address:- alkarajan2{at}gmail.com
Email address: jyotpatel03{at}gmail.com
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
