Abstract
Purpose This study aims to investigate the current state and sentiment of artificial intelligence (AI) training in North American anesthesiology residency programs, assessing existing AI education landscapes, identifying barriers to implementation, and understanding program directors’ expectations for AI’s impact on the field.
Methods A cross-sectional survey targeted anesthesiology program directors across North America. The survey, conducted anonymously via Qualtrics, gauged their AI training offerings, sentiments towards AI’s influence, and familiarity with AI educational policies. Information on questionnaire development, administration, and data analysis was included.
Results Of the 163 programs surveyed, 32 responded, yielding a response rate of 19.6%. A substantial 81% of responding program directors reported no current AI training. Despite this, 67% anticipate AI’s transformative impact. Only 19% currently offer AI/ML training. Standardized presentation of results with accompanying numerators and denominators were employed.
Conclusion The findings reveal a significant gap between the recognition of AI’s importance and the current offering of training in anesthesiology residency programs. Barriers to implementation include resource constraints and time limitations, exacerbated by the pandemic. Overcoming these barriers and aligning positive sentiments with educational offerings is crucial for preparing future physicians for the AI-driven healthcare landscape.
Implication Statement This study exposes a substantial gap between the positive anticipation of AI’s impact on anesthesiology and the current lack of training in North American residency programs. Recognizing this disparity is crucial for swiftly implementing comprehensive AI education, ensuring future anesthesiologists navigate healthcare’s evolving landscape adeptly.
Disclosures The authors have no competing interests or financial interests to disclose. There was no funding associated with the completion of this study.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of University of Florida waived ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
