ABSTRACT
Lewy body disease (LBD) often co-exists with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), influencing disease progression, cognitive decline, and neurodegeneration. This study aims to determine whether plasma phosphorylated-Tau181 (pTau181) could be used as diagnostic biomarker of concurrent Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic change (ADNC) or amyloidosis alone, as well as a prognostic, monitoring, and susceptibility/risk biomarker for clinical outcomes in LBD. Our sample comprised 565 Stanford research participants: 94 LBD with normal cognition, 83 LBD with abnormal cognition, 114 AD, and 274 who were cognitively normal. We measured plasma pTau181 levels with the Lumipulse G platform. Diagnostic accuracy for concurrent ADNC and amyloidosis was assessed with receiver-operating-characteristic curves in a subset of participants with CSF pTau181/Aβ42, and CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 or amyloid-β PET, respectively. We used linear mixed effects models to examine the associations between baseline and longitudinal plasma pTau181 levels and clinical outcomes. Plasma pTau181 predicted concurrent ADNC and amyloidosis in LBD with abnormal cognition with 87% and 72% accuracy, respectively. In the LBD with abnormal cognition, higher baseline plasma pTau181 was associated with worse baseline MoCA and CDR-SB, as well as accelerated decline in CDR-SB. Additionally, in this group rapid increases in plasma pTau181 over 3 years predicted a faster decline in CDR-SB and memory. In LBD with normal cognition, there was no association between baseline or longitudinal plasma pTau181 levels and clinical outcomes; however, elevated pTau181 at baseline increased the risk of conversion to cognitive impairment. These findings suggest that plasma pTau181 is a promising biomarker for concurrent ADNC and amyloidosis in LBD. Furthermore, plasma pTau181 holds potential as a prognostic, monitoring, and susceptibility/risk biomarker, predicting disease progression in LBD.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Susan and Charles Berghoff Foundation postdoctoral fellowship to CA, NIH grant K99AG071837 and Alzheimer's Association (AARFD-21-849349) to CBY, NIH/NIA grant F32AG074625 to JW, P50 NS062684 to BC, NCRAD grant P50 AG047366 and NACC grant P30 AG066515 to VWH, NIH/ NIA grant RF1AG077443 to TJM, NIH/ NIA grant R21AG058859 to ECM, NIH grant K23 NS075097, R01NS115114 and Michael J. Fox Foundation grant 6440.0 to KLP.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board of Stanford University gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Anonymized data supporting the conclusions of the current study is available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request, but this will be contingent upon the authors ability to secure Stanford University's institutional review board approval, and upon both parties signing a data use agreement.
