Abstract
Rare and ultra-rare genetic conditions are estimated to impact nearly 1 in 17 people worldwide, yet accurately pinpointing the diagnostic variants underlying each of these conditions remains a formidable challenge. Because comprehensive, in vivo functional assessment of all possible genetic variants is infeasible, clinicians instead consider in silico variant pathogenicity predictions to distinguish plausibly disease-causing from benign variants across the genome. However, in the most difficult undiagnosed cases, such as those accepted to the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN), existing pathogenicity predictions cannot reliably discern true etiological variant(s) from other deleterious candidate variants that were prioritized through N-of-1 efforts. Pinpointing the disease-causing variant from a pool of plausible candidates remains a largely manual effort requiring extensive clinical workups, functional and experimental assays, and eventual identification of genotype- and phenotype-matched individuals. Here, we introduce VarPPUD, a tool trained on prioritized variants from UDN cases, that leverages gene-, amino acid-, and nucleotide-level features to discern pathogenic variants from other deleterious variants that are unlikely to be confirmed as disease relevant. VarPPUD achieves a cross-validated accuracy of 79.3% and precision of 77.5% on a held-out subset of uniquely challenging UDN cases, respectively representing an average 18.6% and 23.4% improvement over nine traditional pathogenicity prediction approaches on this task. We validate VarPPUD’s ability to discriminate likely from unlikely pathogenic variants on synthetic, GAN-generated candidate variants as well. Finally, we show how VarPPUD can be probed to evaluate each input feature’s importance and contribution toward prediction—an essential step toward understanding the distinct characteristics of newly-uncovered disease-causing variants.
Significance Statement Patients with chronic, undiagnosed and underdiagnosed genetic conditions often endure expensive and excruciating years-long diagnostic odysseys without clear results. In many instances, clinical genome sequencing of patients and their family members fails to reveal known disease-causing variants, although compelling variants of uncertain significance are frequently encountered. Existing computational tools struggle to reliably differentiate truly disease-causing variants from other plausible candidate variants within these prioritized sets. Consequently, the confirmation of disease-causing variants often necessitates extensive experimental follow-up, including studies in model organisms and identification of other similarly presenting genotype-matched individuals, a process that can extend for several years. Here, we present VarPPUD, a tool trained specifically to distinguish likely from unlikely to be confirmed pathogenic variants that were prioritized across cases in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network. By evaluating the importance and impact of different input feature values on prediction, we gain deeper insights into the distinctive attributes of difficult-to-identify diagnostic variants. For patients who remain undiagnosed following comprehensive whole genome sequencing, our new method VarPPUD may reveal pathogenic variants amid a pool of candidate variants, thereby advancing diagnostic efforts where progress has otherwise stalled.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this manuscript was supported by the National Institutes of Health Common Fund, through the Office of Strategic Coordination Office of the National Institutes of Health Director under Award Number U01HG007530.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
There is a mistake in the name of the authors and I also updated the ORCID ID.
Data availability
Deidentified sequencing data is regularly deposited in dbGaP (accession phs001232.v5.p2). Candidate genes and variants are submitted to MatchmakerExchange. Variant-level data, clinical significance and supporting evidence, demographic information, and phenotype information for all diagnostic variants are regularly submitted to ClinVar. Other candidate variants used to train VarPPUD are available to authorized investigators of the Undiagnosed Diseases Network.
