Article Information
History
- April 20, 2024.
Copyright
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Author Information
- Shelby D. Reed, PhD1,2,*,
- Jui-Chen Yang, MEM1,
- Matthew J. Wallace, MA1,
- Jessie Sutphin, MA1,
- F. Reed Johnson, PhD1,2,
- Semra Ozdemir, PhD1,2,3,
- Stephanie Delgado, PhD4,
- Scott Goates, PhD4,
- Nicole Harbert, MPH4,
- Monica Lo, MD5,
- Bharath Rajagopalan, MD6,
- James E. Ip, MD7 and
- Sana M. Al-Khatib, MD, MHS1,8
- 1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham NC, United States
- 2Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- 3Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- 4Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL, United States
- 5Arkansas Heart Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USA
- 6Prairie Education & Research Cooperative, Springfield, IL, USA
- 7New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- 8Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- ↵*Corresponding Author: Shelby D. Reed, PhD, 300 W Morgan Street, Durham, NC 27701, 919-323-5836, shelby.reed{at}duke.edu
Posted April 20, 2024.
Patient preferences for features associated with leadless versus conventional transvenous cardiac pacemakers
