Abstract
NAA15 is a member of the NatA N-terminal acetyltransferase complex, which also includes the NAA10 enzymatic sub-unit. Individuals with variants in the NAA15 coding region develop NAA15-related neurodevelopmental syndrome, which presents with a wide array of manifestations that affect the heart, brain, musculoskeletal system, and behavioral and cognitive development. We tracked a cohort of 27 participants (9 females and 18 males) over time, each with a pathogenic NAA15 variant, and administered the Vineland-3 assessment to assess their adaptive functioning. We found that the cohort performed significantly worse compared to the normalized Vineland values. On average, females performed better than males, and they performed significantly better on the Motor Domain and Fine Motor Sub-Domain portions of the assessment. Over time, females showed a decrease in adaptive functioning, with the decline being especially correlated at the Coping, Domestic, and Fine motor sub-domains. Males (after excluding one outlier) showed a moderate positive correlation between age and ABC standard score. Ultimately, additional longitudinal data should be collected to determine the validity of the between sex-differences and to better understand the change in adaptive behavioral outcomes of individuals with NAA15-neurodevelopmental disorder as they age.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work is supported by New York State Office for People with Developmental Disabilities (OPWDD) and NIH NIGMS R35-GM-133408.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Both oral and written patient consent were obtained for research and publication, with approval of protocol #7659 for the Jervis Clinic by the New York State Psychiatric Institute - Columbia University Department of Psychiatry Institutional Review Board.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
We have expanded the results section to include details of two outlier cases.
Data Availability
All data are deidentified to protect patient privacy, and the underlying data cannot be shared due to these same privacy restrictions.
