Abstract
Considerable spatial heterogeneity has been observed in COVID-19 transmission across administrative regions of England throughout the pandemic. This study investigates what drives these differences. We constructed a probabilistic case count model for 306 administrative regions of England across 95 weeks, fit using a Bayesian evidence synthesis framework. We include the mechanistic impact of acquired immunity, of spatial exportation of cases, and 16 spatially-varying socio-economic, socio-demographic, health, and mobility variables. Model comparison assesses the relative contributions of these respective mechanisms. We find that regionally-varying and time-varying differences in week-to-week transmission were definitively associated with differences in: time spent at home, variant-of-concern proportion, and adult social care funding. However, model comparison demonstrates that the mechanistic impact of these terms was of negligible impact compared to the role of spatial exportation between regions. While these results confirm the impact of some, but not all, measures of regional inequity in England, our work corroborates the finding that observed differences in regional disease transmission during the pandemic were predominantly driven by underlying epidemiological factors rather than the demography and health inequity between regions.
Author Summary During the COVID-19 pandemic, different geographic areas of England saw different patterns in the number of confirmed cases over time. This study investigated whether demographic differences between these areas (such as the amount of deprivation, the age and ethnicity of the populations, or differences in where people spent their time) were linked to these differences in disease transmission. We also considered whether this was associated with the number of cases in neighbouring areas as well. Using a mathematical model fit to multiple data streams, we discovered that a statistically significant link between some demographic variables (time spent at home, COVID-19 variant, and the amount of adult social care funding) and week-to-week transmission exists, but this relationship is very small, and the influence of cases in neighbouring areas was far more impactful in explaining differences in transmission between areas over time.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
TR acknowledges funding by Community Jameel. ES acknowledges support in part by the AI2050 program at Schmidt Futures (Grant [G-22-64476]). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics permission was sought for the study via Imperial College London's (London, UK) standard ethical review processes and was approved by the College's Research Governance and Integrity Team (ICREC reference 21IC6945).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* t.rawson{at}imperial.ac.uk
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at https://github.com/thomrawson/Rawson-spatial-covid
