Exploring rat meat consumption patterns, and perception of risks regarding urban rats; implications for rat-borne zoonoses outbreaks and drug resistant pathogens spread in urban areas of Ghana

Introduction

Global population growth and rapid urbanization poses a critical economic and health challenges [1,2]. This has correlated with the escalation of urban pest populations, including disease vectors, leading to the emergence of new vector-borne illnesses [2,3]. The United Nations estimated that 4.2 billion people currently reside in urban areas worldwide with projections indicating that by 2030, 75% of the global population will live in urban areas [4]. Even Africa and Asia, the least urbanized continents, are anticipated to witness substantial urbanization by 2050 [5] with Ghana having over 50% of its population currently residing in urban areas [6]. As population growth drives expansion of urban land cover, estimated to increase by 1.2 million km², biodiversity loss becomes inevitable to sustain human population density [7]. Consequently, a significant portion of the world’s population is expected to coexist with urban pests in the foreseeable future [8] and human-pest interactions may increase if control measures are not implemented [9]. Urbanization facilitates pest proliferation due to factors such as industrialization, agricultural and infrastructural development, habitat degradation, forest decline, excessive waste generation, and poor environmental management [10,11]. Rats (Rattus sp.), classified as small mammals within the order Rodentia, inhabit forests, peri-urban and urban areas [12]. Their biology, behavior, ecology and adaptability to human environments have been extensively studied due to their economic, medical, social and scientific importance [12,13,14,15,16]. Of the 130 species in the Rattus genus, Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat), Rattus rattus (black rats) and Rattus. tanezumi have successfully colonized urban ecosystems throughout much of human civilization [17,18]. The Norway rat also called the brown rat or the sewer rat is distinguishable from the black rat by its tail, colour, ears and by other morphophysiological features [17]. It exhibits superior competitive aggressiveness and has become one of the most dominant mammals globally [19].The rise in global rat population can be attributed to shifts in human environment, ecology and climate ([2,20] with research indicating a heightened risk of rat infestation in neighborhoods characterized by high poverty levels, aged buildings, dense housing systems and inadequate sanitation [11,21].

Rat meat serves as an important protein source in many countries particularly across Africa, Asia and the Middle East [22,23,24,25,26]. Research in Guinea revealed that 91.5% of the population highly value protein from rodent sources [24]. In Nigeria, of the 200 and 155 study respondents interviewed from urban and peri-urban neighborhoods, 33.5% and 31.1% respectively, consume urban rodents [23]. Various rodent species are consumed in Ghana [27,28]. However, over the past six decades, the majority of the 300+ newly identified infectious diseases have stemmed from wildlife with human-wildlife contact serving as a major transmission pathway [29]. Rodents alone provides reservoir of an estimated 50% of emerging zoonotic pathogens and commensal rats are an ecosystem of numerous disease agents with over fifty-three infectious agents identified thus far [3,20,30,31,32,33]. Diseases such as toxoplasmosis, salmonellosis, plague, leptospirosis, rat-bit fever, hemorrhagic fevers, and zoonotic babesiosis have been associated with rats [3,33]. Transmission of these disease pathogens to humans occurs through various means, including via contamination of water and food, and contact with rat feces and urine [3]. Consuming rat meat raises a more critical risk facilitating the transmission of zoonotic pathogens and epizootics from rat populations to densely populated humans. The act of inhaling aerosolized pathogens from rat fur, the potential exposure to blood-borne and saliva related infections during the carcass handling and butchering, as well as the consumption of undercooked meats, further heighten the risk of zoonotic transmission [34]. These risks were underscored by studies such as Douno and colleagues [35], which explore hunting and consumption of rodents and Mangessho and Colleagues [36] which examine knowledge and perception of pastoralists in Tanzania and hunting and consumption of peridomestic rodents and disease transmission risks in relation to this issue were also discussed by Ter Meulen and colleagues [24]

Regions such as West and East Africa have witnessed a prevalence of rat-borne diseases, with Madagascar experiencing frequent plague outbreaks in recent decades [37,38,39,40,41]. Lassa Fever, endemic in most African countries, poses a more critical threat, primarily transmitted by rats in the genus Mastomys [42]. Among the major zoonoses in West Africa, Lassa Fever causes approximately 100,000-300,000 infections with around 5,000 deaths annually [42,43], Transmission of the disease may occur through contact with rat feces and body fluids [43,44]. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between increases in rat populations and the proliferation of pathogens vectored by rats [20,45,46]. This escalates the risk of epizootic events spilling over into human communities, highlighting the importance of human-rat interactions. Urban rats inhabits diverse habitat types that are under high chemical/drug selection pressures for pathogens and include waste disposal sites, livestock yard, urban agriculture sites, municipal waste water systems, and biomedical/health care/hospital wastes depots which all harbor a wide range of pathogens [47]. These pathogens may be spread to community food sources, water bodies, household insects, and domestic animals including poultry, and pets through commensal rat activities [47,48]. Drug resistant Staphylococcus aureaus were found in household soil, rodents and chickens in Tanzania [49]. In a recently published study, the common rats; R. norvegicus and its cousin R. rattus were identified in mediating the transfer of multiple drug resistant Enterobacteriaciae from livestock into human environment [48]. In this study, 28 of the 53 E. coli strains and two of the five Salmonella strains identified were multiple drug resistant suggesting urban may be playing a crucial role in the dissemination of antimicrobial resistant pathogens (AMR) [31,32,47,48,49,50,51].

Reducing rat populations, particularly in urban settings, presents significant challenges due to various factors. These include dense human populations, extensive infrastructural development [52], nocturnal and sub-nocturnal rodent behavior, the opportunistic nature of urban rats, and their adeptness at establishing nests in obscure locations within human dwellings, and their prolific reproductive ability. Moreover, the behavioral resistance of rats to toxic baits [53] and the resurgence of pesticide resistant rat populations, the banning of glue traps, and second generation anticoagulants, have further exacerbated the global challenge of rat control [54]. In 2020, the Ghanaian media reported a significant event where approximately ten thousand urban rats were killed overnight in the capital city following a major pesticide incident during the active phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, which was indicative that urban rats’ in the capital city have greatly increased. The escalating density, particularly in public places implies an augmented risk of rat-related pathogen transmission to the Ghanaian populace. Despite the cohabitation of Ghanaian urban residents with commensal rats, scant literature addresses the perceptions and apprehensions of the community regarding these rodents. To the best of our knowledge, no prior assessment has been conducted to characterize commensal rats in peridomestic and urban areas in Ghana and the associated potential disease risks. Additionally, public knowledge, perception and awareness of the health risks of rats remain largely unexplored. Previous research in a rural area in Ghana and most countries in Africa and Asia suggested poor knowledge and perceptional unawareness on the disease risks associated with wild animals [55,56,57,58]. This research herein aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the Ghanaian public’s rat meat consumption patterns and their perceptions regarding urban rats. We consider two pathways as determinants for potential zoonotic outbreaks: rat meat consumption and human interaction with rats in the urban environment. This paper examines the potential risk for rodent-borne diseases in urban settings of Ghana.

Materials and Methods

Study area

According to the recent population Census [6], Ghana’s population has increased by approximately six million since 2010, reaching a current total population of over 30.8 million in 2021. Administratively, the country is divided into 16 regions (Fig 1) comprising 261 districts. Seven are urbanized and currently over 17 million of the total population is now residing in urban areas. Southern Ghana has eleven (11) regions whereas, the North has five (5). The country has two major religious groups with Christianity being the predominant religion followed by Islam and traditional beliefs. Islam is more prevalent in the northern region of Ghana. Ghana is linguistically diverse, some 79 ethnic groups speaking over 40 languages and 75 dialects [59] with English serving as the national language. The five largest ethnic groups are Akans, Mole-Dagbon, Ewes, Guans, and the Ga-Adangbe. The Akan ethnic group include subgroups such as Asante, Fantes, Akuapim, Akropong, and Akyems constitute around half (47.5%) of the nation’s population and is mainly distributed in the south. Northern Ghana is dominated by the Mole-Dagbon ethnic group and include the Dagombas majority, Mossi, Mamprusi, Nanumbas and Gonja ethnic group comprising 16.6% of the nation’s population [59]. The remaining ethnic groups, including the Ewe, Ga and Guans constitute about 35.9% of the population [59].

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1. Map of Ghana showing the 16 administrative regions in the north and southern divisions

Results

Sociodemographic predictors of perception scores on disease risk associated with rats

Mann Whitney U test results detailed in Table 6 suggested a significant proportional difference in mean perception scores on health risks associated with rat meat consumption between the genders. No significant difference exist between southern and northern Ghana in mean perception scores on disease risks associated with rat meat consumption. More males than females considered there was a difference between town and bush rats. Both males and females equally indicated that diseases can be contracted by consuming rats from their neighbourhood, however, more males than females perceive a disease risk with consuming bush rats. There was no significant difference between northerners and southerners perceptions of the disease risks pertaining to consuming rat killed from the bush or town. However, a high proportion of northerners than southerners perceive a difference between town and bush rat (Mann Whitney U= 99367; p=0.000). A significant proportion of participants that consumed rat meat rejected the assumption that they can contract diseases by consuming town rat meat (Whitney U=67956.0; p=0.003). They significantly disagreed that rats in their neighbourhood may carry disease agents (Mann Whitney U= 60101; p=000). However no significant difference exist in their perception of disease risk on consuming bush rat (Whitney U=78542.0; p= 0.675). Kruskal-Wallis test of independence and pairwise post hoc tests adjusted by Bonferroni correction for multiple tests detailed in Fig 2 suggested a significant proportional differences in mean perception scores on disease risks associated with consuming neighbourhood/town rats between the education levels, ethnic and professional groupings. Akan ethnicity, those with bachelors’ education and above, and health professionals/teachers, had significantly high mean risk perception scores compared with their counterparts. However, no significant difference existed in the mean risk perception scores among the religious groups. A one way ANOVA showed no significant difference among the age groups regarding their perceptions that diseases can be contracted through the consumption of bush rat meat (F=0.69;p=0.51; df=2) or town rat meat (F=0.21;p=0.81;df=2)

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig 2: Correlation between respondents’ sociodemographic profile and perception scores on disease risks associated with consuming neighbourhood rats.

Ethnicity (a), Profession (b), Religion (c), Education (d)

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup

Table 6. Mann Whitney U test analysis of correlation between sociodemographic variables and perception scores on disease risks associated with rat meat consumption [95%CI].

Males, basic education leavers, those from Mole-Dagbon ethnicity, traders, those who are Islamic/Muslim, and reside in northern Ghana proportionally showed low perception scores about disease risk associated with rats in their neighborhood (Table 6 and Fig 3). Between the genders, a significant proportion of females than males perceived a disease risks associated with rats in their neighbourhood (U = 95867; P=0.000; z-score=4.1). More southerners than northerners perceive disease risks associated with rats in their neighbourhood (U=47887.0; p=0.00; z-score = -9.4). Kruskal-Wallis test of independence and pairwise post hoc tests adjusted by Bonferroni correction for multiple tests suggested a significant proportional differences in mean perception scores on disease risks associated with rats in neighbourhood among the religious groups, educational levels, ethnic and profession groupings (Fig 3). Christians compared with Islamic/Muslims have a higher perception of the disease risk associated with rats in their neighbourhood (Fig 3). Mean perception scores increased significantly from a low perception score in basic education leavers to intermediate/neutral perception in senior high school to a higher perception score in bachelor education and above (Fig 3). Among the professions, health professionals/teachers and students obtained higher mean perception scores than traders. Among the ethnic groups, Akans had a higher perception score than the Mole-Dagbon.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig 3. Correlation between respondents’ sociodemographic profile and perception scores on neighborhood rats as carrier of disease agents.

Ethnicity (e), Educational level (f), Age (g), Religion (h), Profession (I)

Discussion

This survey presents the first baseline study on urban residents’ interactions and attitudes towards rodents in Ghana, which is particularly pertinent given the recent emergence of Lassa fever in the country, and the widespread occurrence of drug resistant pathogens. Our research has identified weaknesses in community knowledge of rodents and the diseases they may spread. Hopefully our data contribute to the on-going efforts by the Ghana Health Service to minimize these health problems through targeted educational campaigns aimed at those groups that where knowledge gaps were identified. Proportionally, our study population was predominantly represented by the two ethnic majorities in Ghana, the Akans and the Mole-Dagbon that collectively constitute 63% of Ghana’s population, which is why approximately 61% of our study subjects were from these ethnic categories. The Akans are regionally prevalent in southern Ghana whereas, the Mole-Dagbons are widespread in the North, as well as Muslim religious groups. We received a higher number of people originating from southern Ghana (65.7%) compared to north, which was attributed to the greater urbanization and population density in the south.

The present study delved into rat meat consumption patterns and perception of disease risks pertaining to peridomestic rats. Sociodemographic determinants associated with the risk of rodent-borne diseases were also assessed. In summary, our findings revealed that rats including commensal species are consumed by a considerable number of Ghanaians in urban settings. Both rat meat consumption and perception of disease risks were driven by sociodemographic variables. Overall statistical analyses showed that, except for education and profession that showed some positive influence on the practice of rat meat consumption and perception of risks, rat meat consumption did not correlate with perceive risk in most sociodemographic categories. The perception of risks about rat meat consumption and rat infestation in urban environments were generally low among the participants allowing us to reject our hypothesis that urban dwellers in Ghana have high risks perceptions pertaining to peridomestic rats. We surmised that this low perception may have contributed to the limited efforts made by the public to control rats.

Our literature search revealed a publication scarcity on the consumption rate of rats in various country settings and regions. Previous research primarily focused on either rodent or bush meat consumption in general, therefore our findings were discussed in that regard. In our study, approximately 65% consumed rodents. This finding aligns with recent studies in Ghana indicating that 67% of Ghanaians [28] prefer bush meat, including rodents, due to the flavor and taste. However, the rate of rodent consumption was higher in Guinea, West Africa, where a study showed that 91.5% of the population considers rodents as an important protein source [24] and also that they are common and easy to obtain at mere/no cost implication. In the present research, we found that approximately 35% of rodent meat consumers also consumed rat meat, and 26% will consume commensal rat in their neighbourhood when available. These findings closely coincide with a related study in Nigeria, which found 33.5% and 31.1% of the study respondents interviewed from urban and peri-urban neighborhood respectively consume urban rodents [23].

Preferences for consuming wild meats in Ghana and across Africa are influenced by various sociodemographic factors [57,62,63]. In this study, we identified gender, education, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, region, income, and profession as independently associated with rat meat consumption. Rat meat consumption correlated with religious beliefs with higher consumption rates in Christians than Muslims aligning with the report by [28] which could be attributed to their religious beliefs. Additionally, cultural beliefs among different ethnic communities contribute to varying levels of bush rat meat consumption. Particularly, high rat meat consumption was observed among the Akan ethnicity as observed by [59]. Although limited data were available for the Ewes and the Mamprusi ethnicities, our data indicates that there is a higher proportion of rat meat consumers within this group. The influence of ethnicity on bush meat consumption has been well-documented in the literature [57,62,63,64]. Regarding regional disparities, our study revealed, a lower consumption rate among the northerners compared to the southerners which was attributed to a higher number of Muslims in the region particularly among Mole-Dagbon ethnic group who probably appear to exhibit less preference for rat meat, presumably due to their beliefs. Gender imbalances in wild meat consumption, with females exhibiting reduced preferences were previously evidenced in Ghana [57]. Regarding age and educational related disparities, our findings are consistent with related research indicating that individuals with at least senior high school education demonstrated reduced wild meat consumption [57]. Higher educational levels have been associated with decreased hunting and wild meat eating behaviours [57]. Regarding income, there are prevailing arguments on if wild meats are a luxury or necessary survival food for the poor [65]. In our research, participants with low or no income associated strongly with rat meat consumption, especially males aged 27 to 34years with no formal/basic education in southern Ghana. The monthly minimum wage in Ghana is only around 500 cedis (USD$37.0 equivalence) suggesting that there is a correlation between rat meat consumption and poverty or low living standards. This finding aligns with the research by [66]. While previous study found no relationship between bush meat consumption and profession [66] the present study did find such an association. Health workers/teachers and students consumed less rat meat than traders, attributable to the high perception scores of disease risks in those with a higher education. We also found that education, profession, religion, and ethnic disparities produced significance differences between the respondents regarding the disease risks associated with peridomestic rats. Male genders, Traders, those with a basic education, Muslims, the Mole-Dagbon ethnic group, and northerners obtained lower perception scores on the disease risks associated with rats in their environment. Regarding the regional distribution of perception scores regarding commensal rats, proportionally, higher perception scores were recorded in southern Ghana than the north. As highlighted earlier, there are more Muslims widespread in the north of Ghana and among the Mole-Dagbon ethnic group who have less preference for rat meat, yet still had low perception scores on disease risk of rodent-borne diseases. Southern Ghana encompasses the major cities of the country and is highly urbanized, with higher levels of education. As noted, other studies have found that education is a strong determinant for knowledge on animal related disease risks [57,67]. In a related study, perception risk scores varied regionally, and by education; rural based cities obtained lower perception scores than urban areas and those with higher education had high risk perception scores than those with a basic education [57]. This again demonstrates that education is a strong determinant for risk perception hence, education and awareness programs are an important intervention strategy to enhance knowledge and improve perceptional awareness on rat-borne diseases. In our study, there were some notable discrepancies in the perception scores between the genders, with males having a lower perception score on the health risks and disease transmission risks associated with commensal rats. This is probably why men tend to consume rat meat more often than the females. In the study herein participants showed significantly high concerns about rat infestation in their neighborhood mainly due to the economic hazard caused by rats such as damage to food and property. Despite their concerns, limited attempts were made to manage rats in their residence/neighbourhood. The limited control attempts can be attributed to the low prevalence of the disease risks associated with rats.

In our current investigation, 35% of the participant reported a daily encounter with commensal rats. Considering the reported weekly, monthly and occasional sightings. A rise in rodent numbers can be attributed to shifts in human environment, ecology and climate [2–20] with research indicating a heightened risk of rat infestation in neighborhoods characterized by high poverty levels, aged buildings, dense housing systems and inadequate sanitation [11,20,21]. Similar to most other African nations, Ghana has a persisting sanitation challenges and poor drainage management contributing to the proliferation and establishment of pest populations.

Despite a significant proportion of participant Ghanaian’s across the various sociodemographic categories interact seeing rats in their neighborhood and that a considerable number consume them, the perceptional awareness on the disease risks regarding rats is low. It is probable that the lack of education and awareness programs pertaining to rat-borne zoonoses in Ghana and the rare occurrences of rat-related zoonoses in the past is the cause for the lack of awareness of the current disease risks. Over 93% of the study participants have no knowledge of anyone suffering from any rat borne zoonoses or have died from rat meat consumption, neither had they seen any information on this topic from the media. Poor perceptional awareness on disease risks associated with human interaction with rats has been previously noted across Africa and Asia [36,55,56,57,58]. A study conducted in rural Ghana documented low awareness level among rural dwellers regarding the potential risks of consuming wild meats [56]. Similarly, in a related study on the consumption of fruit bats in Ghana, although consumption of these species was high among the locals, participants held little beliefs on disease risks [57]. In Malaysia, despite a high proportion of respondents consuming bush meat, the majority had minimal knowledge of the disease risks [58]. Likewise, in Tanzania, more than half the proportion of local population were unaware of the disease risks relating to handling bush meats [55]. The significant majority of the study participants in our investigations found no disease risks associated with consuming rats from the bush compared to rats from town. This aligns with a related study in Uganda, where cooks of bushmeat considered common edible bush rat meat consumption as the least likely to result in any sickness [34]. Among pastoralists in northern and eastern Tanzania, there was a widespread of skepticism that zoonotic illnesses could be spread through the consumption of animal products [36]. We found that the proportion of participants willing to buy bush rat or town rat meat sold in a restaurant were similar suggesting that rat meat consumers consume both commensal and bush rat. People interacting with rats’ may inhale aerosolized pathogens from the fur of rats, can contract blood-borne infections during the handling and butchering process of the carcasses, and can be exposed to pathogens through the consumption of undercooked rat meats [24,34,36]. Mustomys rats that transmit Lassa Fever are highly prolific and commensal in West, Central and East Africa inhabiting areas that are overcrowded and unsanitary [43,44,68] enhancing tendency of being consumed. In Nigeria, the over 85% of the study respondents who had no knowledge of LF and disputed the existence of Lassa Fever virus in rats consume the Mastomys rat vectors [23] exposing them to disease risks. In our investigation, the majority of our respondents indicated rats are most present in their homes and community drains. In the previous study, 28% of households who had rodents in their residence come into contact with their urine and droppings and 24% eat rodent contaminated foods [23]. Human interactions with rats in the home provides a pathway of transferring zoonotic illnesses into the human population via direct and indirect route [32]. Contact with rats through scratches or bites, and exposure to their secretions constitute direct transmission route [3,69]. Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome is contracted via direct transmission through breathing in aerosolized secretions from rats [70]. Indirectly, rats could transmit diseases to human through stepping on household water sources, food, clothing and floors [71] and exposure to air-bone diseases from rats through inhaling sweeping dust can also occur [72]. Peridomestic rats are sentinels, reservoir and vectors in the transmission of AMR pathogens to humans and other animals since they share similar environment with people, domestic pets and insect vectors [47]. The inhabiting of diverse habitats including municipal waste water systems, livestock, urban agriculture sites, cemeteries, mortuaries and biomedical/healthcare/hospital wastes disposal sites, makes urban rats’ good candidates in the transmission of a wide range of AMR [47]. These pathogens may be spread to homes, and domestic animal populations [48] with widespread reports of multiple drug resistant pathogens being spread by commensal rats [31,32,49,50,51]. Rats are also responsible for nosocomial infection transfer [73], and homes close to healthcare and cemeteries in urban areas may be at a higher risk of infections. Rats cause cross food contamination in homes and restaurants by transferring pathogens and chemicals from the various sites to cooked food and stored products [74]. The detrimental implications associated with rats make their presence in urban settlements a critical health risk.

Conclusion

In summary, this study investigated rat meat consumers among urban Ghanaians and examined the perception of risk in the consumption of rat meat and the presence of rat infestations. The study characterized the sociodemographic determinants of rat meat intake and the perceived risk associated with rats. The findings revealed that a considerable proportion of the Ghanaian population in urban areas consume rats, including commensal species. Risk perceptions relating to disease risk associated with rat meat consumption and peridomestic rats were generally low hence, limited attempts were made to control rodents in their neighborhood. The lack of public education and awareness programs on rat-borne zoonoses may be a contributing factor for the low risk perception. Sociodemographic determinants of rat meat consumption and risk perception were identified as targets for future interventions. Our findings reveal that Ghanaians in urban areas are at a threat of zoonotic spillover, which highlights the critical need for public education on rat-borne zoonoses. In addition, rodent management in urban Ghana requires an immediate prioritization, as rodents are a source of drug resistant pathogens that can be spread through communities. Our study will be useful to the Ghana Health Service in the on-going measures to prevent Lassa fever re-occurrence and the spread of drug resistant pathogens in urban areas.