Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Misleading and avoidable: design-induced biases in observational studies evaluating cancer screening—the example of site-specific effectiveness of screening colonoscopy

View ORCID ProfileMalte Braitmaier, View ORCID ProfileSarina Schwarz, View ORCID ProfileVanessa Didelez, View ORCID ProfileUlrike Haug
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.29.24306522
Malte Braitmaier
1Department of Biometry and Data Management, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Malte Braitmaier
Sarina Schwarz
2Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarina Schwarz
Vanessa Didelez
3Department of Biometry and Data Management, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany & Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vanessa Didelez
Ulrike Haug
4Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany & Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ulrike Haug
  • For correspondence: haug{at}leibniz-bips.de
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Article usage

Article usage: May 2024 to June 2025

AbstractFullPdf
May 20243657164
Jun 2024416417
Jul 202435111
Aug 202417712
Sep 202451314
Oct 202418519
Nov 202473528
Dec 2024833224
Jan 2025713739
Feb 2025306214
Mar 20251869865
Apr 2025190784134
May 2025102273139
Jun 202567329
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 24, 2024.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Misleading and avoidable: design-induced biases in observational studies evaluating cancer screening—the example of site-specific effectiveness of screening colonoscopy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Misleading and avoidable: design-induced biases in observational studies evaluating cancer screening—the example of site-specific effectiveness of screening colonoscopy
Malte Braitmaier, Sarina Schwarz, Vanessa Didelez, Ulrike Haug
medRxiv 2024.04.29.24306522; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.29.24306522
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Misleading and avoidable: design-induced biases in observational studies evaluating cancer screening—the example of site-specific effectiveness of screening colonoscopy
Malte Braitmaier, Sarina Schwarz, Vanessa Didelez, Ulrike Haug
medRxiv 2024.04.29.24306522; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.29.24306522

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)