Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Protocol for assessing the impact of the 6th National Audit Project recommendations on practice

View ORCID ProfileSigrún Eyrúnardóttir Clark, Iain Moppett, S. Ramani Moonesinghe, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.03.24306350
Sigrún Eyrúnardóttir Clark
1Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London (UCL), London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sigrún Eyrúnardóttir Clark
  • For correspondence: sigrun.clark{at}ucl.ac.uk
Iain Moppett
2Queen’s Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Ramani Moonesinghe
1Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London (UCL), London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
1Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London (UCL), London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

1. Abstract

Patient safety has been a growing area of concern, especially within perioperative care where risks of major complications during surgery exist. Anaphylaxis in the operating theatre is a life-threatening drug reaction that happens suddenly, without warning and can affect anyone. The 6th National Audit Project (NAP6) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists (RCoA): Perioperative Anaphylaxis was the largest ever prospective study of anaphylaxis related to anaesthesia and surgery. The findings from the audit were collated into a report and included recommendations for improved patient care. The purpose of this study is to understand the perceptions of the NAP6 recommendations and their impact on practice. This study will use ethnographic qualitative methods in the form of observations, interviews and a documentary analysis. The sessions targeted for observations will include departmental or hospital meetings, and educational or training sessions, related to perioperative anaphylaxis. The target sample size of 78 healthcare professionals across six hospitals within England, will include individuals with roles specific to anaesthesia, surgery, immunology, allergy and governance. Additionally, six stakeholders will be interviewed who can provide insights into the NAP6 recommendations at the national level. Across the six sites, local collaborators will share any relevant documents related to perioperative anaphylaxis or the NAP-6 recommendations. The study has received regulatory approvals from the Health Research Authority and has been funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study has been funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study has received regulatory approvals from the Health Research Authority.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 04, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Protocol for assessing the impact of the 6th National Audit Project recommendations on practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Protocol for assessing the impact of the 6th National Audit Project recommendations on practice
Sigrún Eyrúnardóttir Clark, Iain Moppett, S. Ramani Moonesinghe, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
medRxiv 2024.05.03.24306350; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.03.24306350
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Protocol for assessing the impact of the 6th National Audit Project recommendations on practice
Sigrún Eyrúnardóttir Clark, Iain Moppett, S. Ramani Moonesinghe, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
medRxiv 2024.05.03.24306350; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.03.24306350

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Surgery
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)