Abstract
Background More than half of stroke survivors in LMICs lack access to stroke rehabilitation services. The promotion of self-rehabilitation could be promising in an attempt to address the stroke rehabilitation inadequacies in LMICs. Self-rehabilitation interventions can easily be accepted by many community-dwelling stroke survivors, and therefore, have the potential to drive towards the successful realization of Sustainable Development Goals and other WHO rehabilitation goals. We report a consensus building process that sought to identify which task training is relevant to include in a task-specific self-rehabilitation strategy for the rural community-dwelling stroke survivors.
Methods We used an iterative two-staged mixed-method consensus-building approach: (1) focus group discussions (n = 5) with rural community-dwelling stroke survivors were conducted to explore personal life experiences in performing daily activities, and the results were used to developed a lists of candidate task trainings that could be included in a task-specific self-rehabilitation intervention model for improving functional ability post-stroke survivors; (2) a three-round Delphi exercise with a panel of stroke rehabilitation experts to establish consensus on the importance/relevance of the developed task trainings. Consensus was pre-defined to be the point where the proportion of items giving a rating of 3 (quite relevant) or 4 (highly relevant) by raters would be ≥ 0.8.
Results A list of 74 task training was generated from the results of the focus groups and grouped as follows: training for the upper extremity (37); lower extremity training (21); while 7 and 9 task trainings were grouped under the trunk and balance training respectively. A panel of 13 experts in the Delphi reviewed these task trainings and consensus was achieved on keeping 28 task trainings in the first round and an additional 7 in the second round. In the study team’s analysis of open text responses, several areas of debate were identified and some task trainings were modified. The exercise yielded 49 trainings (66% of 74) on which there was consensus (the mean proportion of items giving a rating of 3 or 4 by raters was 0.93) to keep 3 task training groups relating to: upper extremity (27), lower extremity/balance (8), trunk strength (4) and warm up exercises (10).
Conclusions The study provides a consensus-based view of the features of a task-specific self-rehabilitation training strategy to improve outcomes following a stroke. This self-rehabilitation training strategy can be used as an intervention approach to augment and promote stroke rehabilitation among the rural community-dwelling stroke survivors, especially in SSA.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
College Health Research Ethics Committee of College of Health Sciences, Bayero University gave ethical approval (NHREC/06/12/19/5) for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
