Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Effectiveness of Leading Pedestrian Intervals for Pedestrian Safety in New York City

View ORCID ProfileSiddhesh Zadey, Leah E. Roberts, Brady Bushover, Ariana N. Gobaud, Christina A. Mehranbod, Carolyn S. Fish, Evan L. Eschliman, Xiang Gao, Dana E. Goin, Christopher N. Morrison
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.03.24306847
Siddhesh Zadey
1Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York NY 10032 USA
2Association for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, Maharashtra, India 411007
BSMS MScGH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Siddhesh Zadey
Leah E. Roberts
1Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York NY 10032 USA
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brady Bushover
1Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York NY 10032 USA
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ariana N. Gobaud
1Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York NY 10032 USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina A. Mehranbod
1Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York NY 10032 USA
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolyn S. Fish
1Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York NY 10032 USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evan L. Eschliman
1Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York NY 10032 USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiang Gao
1Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York NY 10032 USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dana E. Goin
1Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York NY 10032 USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher N. Morrison
1Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York NY 10032 USA
3Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne VIC 3004 Australia
PhD MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cm3820{at}cumc.columbia.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Road traffic crashes are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in large cities. Cities including New York City (NYC) in the United States (US) have implemented a suite of interventions to reduce road traffic crashes. Leading pedestrian intervals (LPIs) are a low-cost physical environmental intervention premised to reduce vehicle-pedestrian crashes by providing pedestrians a head-start over the turning vehicular traffic. Using a spatial ecological panel design, we assessed the impact of LPIs on the risk of total, non-fatal, and fatal pedestrian injuries in NYC from January 2013 to December 2018. For the 36,102 intersection-years studied and 6,017 intersections (2,883 LPI-treated) included in the study, there were 26,033 total injuries of which 291 were fatal. Significant reductions were observed for total (19.4% [95% CI: 11.8%, 26.4%]) and non-fatal injuries (19.6% [11.9%, 26.5%]) but not for fatal injuries. Multiple sensitivity analyses ensured robustness of findings. LPIs may prove to be an effective intervention to improve pedestrian safety outcomes across cities.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Research reported in this presentation was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Injury Control Research Center Grant R49CE003094. ELE is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Drug Abuse grant T32DA031099. The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC or NIH.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 06, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effectiveness of Leading Pedestrian Intervals for Pedestrian Safety in New York City
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Effectiveness of Leading Pedestrian Intervals for Pedestrian Safety in New York City
Siddhesh Zadey, Leah E. Roberts, Brady Bushover, Ariana N. Gobaud, Christina A. Mehranbod, Carolyn S. Fish, Evan L. Eschliman, Xiang Gao, Dana E. Goin, Christopher N. Morrison
medRxiv 2024.05.03.24306847; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.03.24306847
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Effectiveness of Leading Pedestrian Intervals for Pedestrian Safety in New York City
Siddhesh Zadey, Leah E. Roberts, Brady Bushover, Ariana N. Gobaud, Christina A. Mehranbod, Carolyn S. Fish, Evan L. Eschliman, Xiang Gao, Dana E. Goin, Christopher N. Morrison
medRxiv 2024.05.03.24306847; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.03.24306847

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)