Abstract
Background Epigenetic age acceleration (EAA, i.e., higher EA relative to chronological age) may be linked to adverse mental health outcomes in children. Previously, EAA has been associated with advanced physical maturation and early pubertal development in adolescents. However, research on epigenomic changes and mental health outcomes in children remains limited. This systematic review aimed to investigate the associations between epigenetic age deviation (greater or lower EA age relative to chronological age) and mental health outcomes in childhood.
Methods This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant terms were used to search the PubMed, Scopus, and PsychINFO (via Ebsco host) online databases. The search commenced between February and September 2022. Only full-text studies published in English, involving participants under 18 years of age, and examining associations between epigenetic age deviation and child mental health outcomes were eligible for inclusion.
Results and conclusion Among the 4 studies that met the inclusion criteria for this review, 3 studies independently reported significant associations between EAA and internalising behaviour in children and adolescents (aged 4 to 17 years). However, a meta-analysis (OR=1.14, [95% CI, 0.86-1.49]) incorporating a subset of these studies (n=2) did not confirm this finding, though heterogeneity between studies was observed (I2 =81%, p=0.022). While the data are not consistent, the findings of this systematic review suggest that EAA holds promise as a potential biomarker for identifying children and adolescents at risk of internalising problems. Given the limited number of studies and the heterogeneity in effect size measures, further work is warranted to explore these preliminary findings.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
L.B Moyakhe is a recipient of the South African Medical Research Council funding, through its division of Research Capacity Development under the Internship Scholarship program. The funders had no role in the study design, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and decision to submit the article for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
