Abstract
Background The effects of habitual physical activity on physiology and disease prevention are not fully understood. We examined the associations between physical activity, metabolites in systemic circulation, and breast cancer risk.
Methods Total physical activity levels were assessed using doubly labeled water, accelerometers, and previous day recalls in the IDATA study (N=707 participants, ages 50-74 years, 51% women). Assessments occurred 1-6 times over a 12-month period and blood samples were collected twice. Partial Spearman correlations were used to estimate associations between physical activity and 843 serum metabolites, corrected for multiple testing using the false discovery rate (p-adj<0.05). Associations between physical activity-associated metabolites and breast cancer were explored in a prospective cohort (621 cases, 621 controls) using conditional logistic regression.
Results Physical activity was associated with 164 metabolites, spanning a wide range of pathways, including many amino acid pathways, glucose homeostasis, and bile acid metabolism. Nine physical activity-associated metabolites were also associated with postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Key metabolites were N-acetylthreonine, isovalerylglycine, 2-methylbutyroylcarnitine (amino acids and derivatives), androsteroid monosulfate C19H28O6S (1), and X-21310. These metabolites were consistent with a protective role of physical activity on breast cancer prevention and particularly implicated a role for branched chain amino acid catabolism. Sphingomyelin (d18:1/20:1, d18:2/20:0) levels were lower in participants with higher physical activity energy expenditure and were also associated with lower breast cancer risk.
Conclusion Physical activity is associated with a broad range of metabolites, some of which are also associated with reduced breast cancer risk, highlighting potential metabolic pathways for cancer prevention.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH at the National Cancer Institute and National Institute on Aging (USA). The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Special Studies Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Institute, NIH gave ethical approval for this work and all participants signed informed consent.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability Statement
All bona fide researchers can apply to use the IDATA and PLCO resources for health-related research (https://cdas.cancer.gov/).
