Abstract
Refractory postoperative vasoplegia following cardiac surgery and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation predicts poor outcomes. We aimed to investigate outcomes and predictors of postoperative vasoplegia. We retrospectively reviewed a single-center cohort of 190 patients who received LVADs from January 2015 through March 2022 at The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center. Primary outcomes included duration of ICU stay, development of right heart failure (RHF), and mortality. Secondary outcomes included pre-implant medications and post-implant blood products. Vasoplegia was defined as physician documentation of vasoplegia with patients requiring ≥1 intravenous vasopressors within 48-hours following LVAD implantation to maintain a mean arterial pressure >65 mmHg for >24 hours. Overall, 55 (29%) patients developed vasoplegia following LVAD implantation. Our sample was stratified into two cohorts: patients with vasoplegia and without vasoplegia. Baseline characteristics, LVAD indication, creatinine clearance, and comorbidities did not vary significantly between cohorts. Patients without vasoplegia were more likely to have prior implantable cardiac defibrillators (p = 0.02) and were more commonly prescribed pre-operative inotropes (p = 0.03). Blood-product administration within the first 48-hours postoperatively did not differ. While patients with vasoplegia required a longer ICU stay post-op (5 vs 7 days, p = 0.03), there were no significant differences in development of RHF (39% vs 44%), 30-day (7% vs 13%), 1-year (31% vs 29%), and 2-year mortality (39% vs 33%) in patients without and with vasoplegia, respectively. Overall, our vasoplegia rates were consistent with previous literature (29%) and vasoplegia did not confer inferior outcomes for mortality or developing RHF.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Prior to data collection the study protocol was evaluated and approved by the institutional review board at The Ohio State University Medical Center (#2019H0328).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data available in the manuscript is available for review upon request
