Abstract
Introduction and Hypothesis Vaginal dimensions have clinical and surgical implications. We sought to quantify the differences between vaginal and labial dimensions in healthy ethnic Chinese and Western women with normal pelvic organ support.
Methods This is a cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of ethnic Chinese nullipara (n = 33) and Western nullipara (n= 33) women recruited for research purposes. For each subject, magnetic resonance imaging was used to quantify the vaginal and labial dimensions. Specifically, we identified the anterior and posterior vaginal wall, the outline of the cervix in the mid-sagittal and coronal planes, and the distance from the labia majora to the hymenal ring at the urethral meatus.
Results The vaginal and labial dimensions of ethnic Chinese nullipara were 9-21 % smaller than those of Western nullipara; however, the relative orientation of the cervix to the vaginal opening was not different.
Conclusions Significant group differences in vaginal and labial dimensions were found, with Chinese nullipara dimensions being up to 21% smaller than those of Western nullipara.
Brief Summary Ethnic Chinese women have smaller vaginal and labial dimensions than Western women. These differences have clinical and surgical implications.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by a research grant from Procter & Gamble and the National Institutes of Health under grants R01 HD038665, P50 HD044406, and RC2 DK122379 grants.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of University of Michigan have ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: This study was funded by a research grant from Procter & Gamble and the National Institutes of Health under grants R01 HD038665, P50 HD044406, and RC2 DK122379 grants.
Financial disclaimer/Conflict of interest: None
Ethical approval: This study received approval from the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board (HUM00180846) and all subjects gave written consent to participate.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
