Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Approximating R1 and R2: a quantitative approach to clinical weighted MRI

Shachar Moskovich, Oshrat Shtangel, Aviv A. Mezer
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.22.24307730
Shachar Moskovich
1The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shachar.moskovich{at}mail.huji.ac.il
Oshrat Shtangel
1The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aviv A. Mezer
1The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Weighted MRI images are widely used in clinical as well as open-source neuroimaging databases. Weighted images such as T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and proton density-weighted (T1w, T2w, and PDw, respectively) are used for evaluating the brain’s macrostructure; however, their values cannot be used for microstructural analysis, since they lack physical meaning. Quantitative MRI (qMRI) relaxation rate parameters (e.g., R1 and R2), and related relaxivity coefficients, do contain microstructural physical meaning.

Nevertheless, qMRI is rarely done in large-scale clinical databases.

Currently, the weighted images ratio T1w/T2w is used as a quantifier to approximate the brain’s microstructure. In this paper, we propose three additional quantifiers that approximate quantitative maps, which can help bring quantitative MRI to the clinic for easy use.

Following the signal equations and using simple mathematical operations, we combine the T1w, T2w, and PDw images to estimate the R1 and R2.

We find that two of these quantifiers (T1w/PDw and T1w/ln(T2w)) can serve as a semi-quantitative proxy for R1, and that (ln(T2w/PDw)) can approximate R2.

We find that this approach also can be applied to T2w scans taken from widely available DTI datasets. We tested these quantifiers on both in vitro phantom and in vivo human datasets. We found that the quantifiers accurately represent the quantitative parameters across datasets. Finally, we tested the quantifiers within a clinical context, and found that they retain tissue information across datasets. Our work provides a simple pipeline to enhance the usability and quantitative accuracy of MRI weighted images.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Protocols

https://github.com/MezerLab/semiQ

Funding Statement

This study did not receive external funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

All study procedures were approved by the Helsinki Ethics Committee from Hadassah Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

https://www.ppmi-info.org/access-data-specimens/download-data

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 22, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Approximating R1 and R2: a quantitative approach to clinical weighted MRI
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Approximating R1 and R2: a quantitative approach to clinical weighted MRI
Shachar Moskovich, Oshrat Shtangel, Aviv A. Mezer
medRxiv 2024.05.22.24307730; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.22.24307730
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Approximating R1 and R2: a quantitative approach to clinical weighted MRI
Shachar Moskovich, Oshrat Shtangel, Aviv A. Mezer
medRxiv 2024.05.22.24307730; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.22.24307730

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Radiology and Imaging
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)