ABSTRACT
Background People with malignant (primary or metastatic) or benign tumors may present in clinical practice with neck pain, with or without other symptoms (e.g., radicular pain or headache). When not presenting as an emergency, neck pain is most often assessed by primary care clinicians such as general practitioners, physiotherapists, chiropractors or osteopaths. Therefore, primary care clinicians must be able to screen for tumors when evaluating patients with neck pain.
Despite clinical practice guidelines providing recommendations to triage serious conditions presenting as neck pain, there is a paucity of overviews on red flags for tumors in patients presenting with neck pain in primary care settings. The present scoping review aims to comprehensively map the existing literature on red flags for tumors in patients presenting with neck pain in primary care settings. Furthermore, we will aim to identify gaps in the literature to direct future research in this area.
Methods We will search MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, CINHAL, and Scopus. In addition, we will use Web of Science to implement backward and forward citation tracking strategies. We will consider any primary study design written in English or Italian. No time or geographical restrictions will be applied to the search. Studies with a focus on the diagnostic pathway, considering patients of any age and gender with a diagnosis of tumor and a primary complaint of neck pain will be eligible for inclusion. Only studies conducted in primary care settings will be considered. Two authors will independently perform the study selection and data extraction phases. Results from the scoping review will be summarized descriptively through tables and diagrams. As a scoping review, we will highlight any gaps in the existing literature regarding our research questions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Beatrice Occhetto and Martina Ballesio share the first authorship
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
