Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Impact of adherence and stringency on the effectiveness of lockdown measures: a modelling study

View ORCID ProfileJoren Brunekreef, View ORCID ProfileAlexandra Teslya, View ORCID ProfileVincent Buskens, View ORCID ProfileHendrik Nunner, View ORCID ProfileMirjam Kretzschmar
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.23.24307781
Joren Brunekreef
1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joren Brunekreef
Alexandra Teslya
1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alexandra Teslya
Vincent Buskens
2Department of Sociology / ICS, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
3Center for Complex Systems Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vincent Buskens
Hendrik Nunner
3Center for Complex Systems Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
4Institute for Multimedia and Interactive Systems, University of Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hendrik Nunner
Mirjam Kretzschmar
1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
3Center for Complex Systems Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mirjam Kretzschmar
  • For correspondence: m.e.e.kretzschmar{at}umcutrecht.nl
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, lockdowns were a widely used strategy to reduce disease transmission. However, there was much debate about the optimal level of strictness and duration of lockdowns. This study considers how lockdowns impact public health opinions, which in turn influence adherence to and effectiveness of these measures. We developed an agent-based simulation model to study the impact of health-related opinions on the effectiveness of lockdowns in controlling disease spread. The model simulates infection spread and health opinion dynamics among individuals connected through a network of contacts and incorporates feedback loops between epidemic variables and opinion dynamics. We simulated different scenarios of lockdown implementation by varying a threshold value of prevalence when a lockdown is initiated and the stringency of the lockdown. We found that quickly imposing a lockdown with high stringency is the most effective at reducing infection spread, provided that there is a certain degree of adherence to the lockdown among the population. Furthermore, stricter lockdowns minimize fatigue with respect to the imposed measures, since the duration of a lockdown is shorter on average in this scenario. Such lockdown policies can therefore be a beneficial, high-impact tool in containing epidemic spread, especially when supplemented by information interventions maintaining the adherence to lockdown measures.

Author summary Lockdowns were a widely used strategy to curb disease transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the effectiveness of such measures depends on the population’s adherence to the regulations. Long and strict lockdowns may lower this adherence as the population experiences ‘fatigue’ with the regulations. In our study, we model the interplay between lockdowns, disease transmission, and health-related opinions in a population network.

We tested various lockdown scenarios by altering strictness of measures on the one hand, and lockdown initiation times based on disease prevalence rates on the other hand. Our findings show that swift, stringent lockdowns are the most effective in reducing infections, particularly with strong public compliance. Additionally, stricter lockdowns tend to reduce fatigue as they are generally shorter.

These results highlight that prompt, rigorous lockdown policies, supported by strategies to maintain public adherence, are most efficient in controlling epidemics. Furthermore, effective communication to ensure community cooperation may enhance the success of these measures.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw, grant number 91216062). H.N. and M.K. acknowledge funding by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research for the infoXpand project (031L0300A).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • PDF rendering errors caused some figures to be invisible in some reader software. These figures have now been fixed. Also, acknowledgments section was updated.

Data Availability

Code used for generating the results is openly available online at https://github.com/JorenB/infections-lockdowns-opinions

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 24, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of adherence and stringency on the effectiveness of lockdown measures: a modelling study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Impact of adherence and stringency on the effectiveness of lockdown measures: a modelling study
Joren Brunekreef, Alexandra Teslya, Vincent Buskens, Hendrik Nunner, Mirjam Kretzschmar
medRxiv 2024.05.23.24307781; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.23.24307781
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Impact of adherence and stringency on the effectiveness of lockdown measures: a modelling study
Joren Brunekreef, Alexandra Teslya, Vincent Buskens, Hendrik Nunner, Mirjam Kretzschmar
medRxiv 2024.05.23.24307781; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.23.24307781

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)