Abstract
Aim To examine the adherence rate to surveillance guidelines after curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and the impact of demographic factors.
Methods Data was collected retrospectively including demographics, stage at diagnosis, and adherence to surveillance guidelines as recommended by the US Multi-Society Task Force (USMSTF) guidelines, for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who underwent curative surgical resection between 2005 and 2014 in a tertiary academic medical center.
Results A total of 124 patients were included (Male /female, 56.5%/ 43.5%), African American 109 (87.9%), and 70 patients (56.5%) had Medicare/Medicaid insurance. Overall, Appropriate clinical evaluation twice per year for 3 years following surgery was completed in 78 (63%) of patients. A total of 56 (45%) had carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels checked twice a year for 3 years. Surveillance colonoscopy 1 year postoperatively occurred in 64 (51.6%), and 37 (29.8%) had a second colonoscopy 3 years postoperatively. Abdomen/pelvis CT scan was obtained in 90 (72.5%) at 1 year post-operatively. In the entire cohort, strict adherence to post-recession surveillance only occurred in 46 (37.1%). There was no correlation between adherence to surveillance and gender (p=0.184), race (p=0.118), or insurance type (p=0.51).
Conclusion Adherence to surveillance after curative resection of CRC was inadequate regardless of socioeconomic, medical insurance, or race. Measures should be taken to identify barriers and improve compliance with guidelines.
What is already known on this topic?Effective surveillance after colorectal cancer surgery is essential, yet many patients fail to follow recommended guidelines. Existing research highlights disparities in CRC outcomes based on race, socioeconomic status, and insurance coverage, affecting early detection and treatment.
What this study adds Our study reveals a 37.1% adherence rate to surveillance guidelines among CRC patients in an urban medical center, unaffected by gender, race, or insurance status. This challenges previous assumptions about demographic disparities in post-resection care.
How this study might affect research, practice, or policy The study highlights the need for interventions to improve adherence rate to CRC surveillance. Future research, clinical practices, and policy initiatives should focus on overcoming barriers to ensure equitable and effective follow-up care.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was not funded.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work, and it was not funded.
Data Availability
The data used to support this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
