Abstract
Objective The Nine Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) is a widely used measure assessing symptoms of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). Previous studies suggest that individuals with eating disorders driven by shape/weight concerns also have elevated scores on the NIAS. To further clarify this issue, we characterized NIAS scores in a large sample of individuals with eating disorders and evaluated overlap in symptoms measured by the NIAS and the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) version 6.0.
Method Our sample comprised 9,148 participants from the Eating Disorders Genetics Initiative Sweden (EDGI-SE), who completed surveys including NIAS and EDE-Q. NIAS scores were calculated and compared by eating disorder diagnostic group using descriptive statistics and linear models.
Results Participants with current anorexia nervosa demonstrated the highest mean NIAS scores and had the greatest proportion (57.0%) of individuals scoring above a clinical cutoff on at least one of the NIAS subscales. Individuals with bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, and other specified feeding or eating disorder also demonstrated elevated NIAS scores compared to individuals with no lifetime history of an eating disorder (ps < .05). All subscales of the NIAS showed small to moderate correlations with all subscales of the EDE-Q (rs = 0.26-0.40).
Discussion Our results substantiate that individuals with eating disorders other than ARFID demonstrate elevated scores on the NIAS, suggesting that this tool is inadequate on its own for differentiating ARFID from shape/weight-motivated eating disorders. Further research is needed to inform clinical interventions addressing the co-occurrence of ARFID-related drivers and shape/weight-related motivation for dietary restriction.
Competing Interest Statement
Cynthia M. Bulik receives royalties from Pearson outside the submitted work. Lisa Dinkler has received personal fees from Baxter Medical AB and Fresenius Kabi AB outside the submitted work. All other authors did not report any biomedical or financial conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the participants Eating Disorder Genetics Initiative-Sweden (EDGI-SE). EDGI-SE was funded by the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsradet, 538-2013-8864, PI: Bulik). Emily K. Presseller was supported by NIMH (F31MH131262). Cynthia M. Bulik was supported by NIMH (R56MH129437; R01MH120170; R01MH124871; R01MH119084; R01MH118278); Swedish Research Council (538-2013-8864); Lundbeck Foundation (R276-2018-4581). Lisa Dinkler was supported by Swedish Society for Medical Research (SSMF, PG-22-0478), Swedish Mental Health Foundation (Fonden for Psykisk Halsa 2022 & 2023); and Fredrik and Ingrid Thurings Foundation (Thurings stiftelse 2021-00660). The funders had no role in the design/conduct of the study, data management/analysis, or manuscript preparation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study has ethical approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (dnr 2020-02243).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
ekp55{at}drexel.edu gabrielle_cooper{at}med.unc.edu laura_thornton{at}med.unc.edu andreas.birgegard{at}ki.se afrouz.abbaspour{at}ki.se emma.forsen{at}ki.se cynthia_bulik{at}med.unc.edu lisa.dinkler{at}ki.se
Data Availability
Data are available on request from the authors.
