Abstract
Introduction While previous studies have demonstrated that generative artificial intelligence (AI) can pass medical licensing exams, AI’s role as an examiner in complex, interactive assessments remains unknown. AI-powered chatbots could serve as educational tools to simulate oral examination dialogues. Here, we present initial validity evidence for an AI-powered chatbot designed for general surgery residents to prepare for the American Board of Surgery (ABS) Certifying Exam (CE).
Methods We developed a chatbot using GPT-4 to simulate oral board scenarios. Scenarios were completed by general surgery residents from six different institutions. Two experienced surgeons evaluated the chatbot across five domains: inappropriate content, missing content, likelihood of harm, extent of harm, and hallucinations. We measured inter-rater reliability to determine evaluation consistency.
Results Seventeen residents completed a total of 20 scenarios. Commonly tested topics included small bowel obstruction (30%), diverticulitis (20%), and breast disease (15%). Based on two independent reviewers, evaluation revealed 11 to 25% of chatbot simulations had no errors and an additional 11% to 35% contained errors of minimal clinical significance. Chatbot limitations included incorrect management advice and critical omissions of information.
Conclusions This study demonstrates the potential of an AI-powered chatbot in enhancing surgical education through oral board simulations. Despite challenges in accuracy and safety, the chatbot offers a novel approach to medical education, underscoring the need for further refinement and standardized evaluation frameworks. Incorporating domain-specific knowledge and expert insights is crucial for improving the efficacy of AI tools in medical education.
Competing Interest Statement
Joshua Roshal is a consultant for McGraw Hill, an American publishing company whose mission is the education of current and future healthcare professionals.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board of Columbia University classified this project as exempt and waived a full review under Protocol AAAV2136
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. Data analysis performed for the methods is available via the link below
