Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A scoping review of the format, content, effectiveness and acceptability of reproductive life planning tools

View ORCID ProfileC Stewart, View ORCID ProfileH Noh, View ORCID ProfileN Pathak, View ORCID ProfileJA Hall
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.31.24308272
C Stewart
1UCL Institute for Women’s Health, Reproductive Health Research Department, Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Team
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C Stewart
H Noh
2UCL Division of Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H Noh
N Pathak
3UCL Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences
4Guy’s & St Thomas’s NHS Foundation Trust, Community Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N Pathak
JA Hall
1UCL Institute for Women’s Health, Reproductive Health Research Department, Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Team
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for JA Hall
  • For correspondence: jennifer.hall{at}ucl.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Article Information

doi 
https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.31.24308272
History 
  • June 1, 2024.
Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.

Author Information

  1. C Stewart1,
  2. H Noh2,
  3. N Pathak3,4 and
  4. JA Hall1,*
  1. 1UCL Institute for Women’s Health, Reproductive Health Research Department, Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Team
  2. 2UCL Division of Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences
  3. 3UCL Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences
  4. 4Guy’s & St Thomas’s NHS Foundation Trust, Community Sexual and Reproductive Health
  1. ↵*Corresponding author; email: jennifer.hall{at}ucl.ac.uk
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 01, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A scoping review of the format, content, effectiveness and acceptability of reproductive life planning tools
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A scoping review of the format, content, effectiveness and acceptability of reproductive life planning tools
C Stewart, H Noh, N Pathak, JA Hall
medRxiv 2024.05.31.24308272; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.31.24308272
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A scoping review of the format, content, effectiveness and acceptability of reproductive life planning tools
C Stewart, H Noh, N Pathak, JA Hall
medRxiv 2024.05.31.24308272; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.31.24308272

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Sexual and Reproductive Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)