ABSTRACT
Objective This study aimed to assess common barriers to adherence to the Physical Therapy Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Practice Guidelines (PTCPG) and design an action plan to address these barriers.
Setting Single University Health System
Participants Electronic medical record (EMR) data were collected over an initial 6-month period and then a follow-up 6-month period after the interventions. The initial period yielded an average of 129 patients with a concussion diagnosis, and the follow-up period yielded an average of 331 patients.
Design Through the knowledge-to-action framework, it was identified that providers were often unaware of current practice guidelines, and some had a low comfort level with the diagnosis. Subsequent action items to address these barriers included education sessions, modification of a concussion documentation template to better align with PTCPG recommendations, and the design of a pop-up within the electronic medical records that allowed providers to create a referral to a concussion treatment network.
Main Measures Frequency calculations were performed based on whether the outcome measure was performed at any time during a concussion episode of care. Selection of outcome measures was determined by what outcome measures were available for use within the EMR and aligned with the PTCPG recommended system domains. Data was collected from the following providers: physical therapists, occupational therapists, sports medicine physicians and physical medicine & rehab physicians.
Results From the initial EMR query to the follow-up, the following increases in use of outcome measures were seen with each outcome measure, Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) = 10.0%, Cervical & Thoracic Screen = 6.0%, Vestibular Ocular Motor Screen (VOMS) = 12.6%, Modified Orthostatic Vital Signs (MOVS) = 18.9%, Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT) = 3.5%, Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) = -4.8%, Sensory Organization Test (SOT) = 0.9%.
Conclusion The improvement in adherence to recommendations was attributed to a knowledge to action approach that combined education along with structural changes to electronic medical record documentation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of University of Utah waived ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
DISCLOSURES / CONFLICTS OF INTEREST None
FUNDING None
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
