Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Genetic Evidence for a Causal Link between Intra-Pancreatic Fat Deposition and Pancreatitis: a Mendelian Randomization Study

View ORCID ProfileHajime Yamazaki, Martin Heni, Róbert Wagner, Shunichi Fukuhara, Steven R. Grossman, Sihao Han, Lang Wu, Samantha A. Streicher, Brian Z. Huang
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.03.24308330
Hajime Yamazaki
1Section of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
2Center for Innovative Research for Communities and Clinical Excellence (CiRC2LE), Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hajime Yamazaki
  • For correspondence: yamazaki.hajime.7n{at}kyoto-u.ac.jp
Martin Heni
3Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
4Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Department for Diagnostic Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Róbert Wagner
5Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
6Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
7German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shunichi Fukuhara
1Section of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
2Center for Innovative Research for Communities and Clinical Excellence (CiRC2LE), Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
8Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven R. Grossman
9Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
10Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sihao Han
11Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
MBBS, MPH, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lang Wu
12Cancer Epidemiology Division, Population Sciences in the Pacific Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samantha A. Streicher
12Cancer Epidemiology Division, Population Sciences in the Pacific Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Z. Huang
9Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
13Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Recent associative studies have linked intra-pancreatic fat deposition (IPFD) with risk of pancreatitis, but the causal relationship remains unclear.

Methods Utilizing Mendelian randomization, we evaluated the causal association between genetically predicted IPFD and pancreatitis. This approach utilized genetic variants from genome-wide association studies of IPFD (n=25,617), acute pancreatitis (n=6,787 cases/361,641 controls), and chronic pancreatitis (n=3,875 cases/361,641 controls).

Results Genetically predicted IPFD was significantly associated with acute pancreatitis (OR per 1-SD increase: 1.40[95%CI:1.12-1.76], p=0.0032) and chronic pancreatitis (OR:1.64[95%CI:1.13-2.39], p=0.0097).

Discussion Our findings support a causal role of IPFD in pancreatitis, suggesting that reducing IPFD could lower the risk of pancreatitis.

Introduction

Intra-pancreatic fat deposition (IPFD) represents a state of lipid accumulation within the pancreas, which can be detected by ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)(1, 2). Our previous prospective cohort study demonstrated an association between IPFD and pancreatic cancer, and our subsequent Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis provided causal evidence for its pathogenic impact(3). MR analysis is regarded as a natural randomized trial to assess causality since it uses genetic variants, which are randomly assigned at conception and remain unaffected by subsequent acquired diseases or environmental influences. This approach minimizes issues of reverse causation and confounding present in observational studies(3-5).

Of note, a recent prospective cohort study not only verified the relationship between IPFD and pancreatic cancer but also revealed an association with acute pancreatitis (AP), which is one of the leading causes of gastrointestinal-related hospital admissions(6, 7). To further elucidate causality between IPFD and pancreatitis, we conducted a two-sample MR study to evaluate the causal association of IPFD with both AP and chronic pancreatitis (CP).

Methods

We leveraged eight independent genetic variants associated with MRI-measured IPFD (p<5× 10−8) from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using UK Biobank data (n=25,617 individuals)(8). In this study, the mean age (standard deviation [SD]) was 64 (7.5) years, and 51% of the participants were female. The mean (SD) of IPFD was 10.4 (7.9) %(8). We assessed the association of these IPFD-associated genetic variants with AP and CP using data from the GWAS of AP (6,787 cases and 361,641 controls) and CP (3,875 cases and 361,641 controls) in the FinnGen study(9). Diagnoses of AP and CP were identified using ICD or KELA reimbursement codes (see: https://r10.risteys.finngen.fi/endpoints/K11_ACUTPANC and https://r10.risteys.finngen.fi/endpoints/K11_CHRONPANC). Ethical review for the current analyses was waived as the data utilized were de-identified and sourced from public databases.

For the primary MR analyses, the association of each IPFD-associated genetic variant with AP or CP was weighted by its association with IPFD, and estimates were combined using the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method. To evaluate the strength of the association between each IPFD-associated genetic variant and IPFD, we calculated F-statistics, which values >10 indicating valid genetic variants for MR(4). Cochran’s Q value was calculated to evaluate the heterogeneity among estimates obtained using different genetic variants.

To account for potential pleiotropy (i.e., IPFD-associated genetic variants affecting pancreatitis through pathways other than IPFD), we evaluated whether these IPFD associated genetic variants were also associated with alcohol use or cholelithiasis using published GWAS data(10, 11). None of the eight IPFD-associated genetic variants were associated with alcohol use or cholelithiasis at a GWAS threshold (p < 5×10−8). However, using the Bonferroni corrected threshold of p<0.00625 (p<0.05/8 genetic variants), as used in previous MR studies(3, 12), one genetic variant (rs115478735) had a nominal association with cholelithiasis. Therefore, leave-one-out analyses was conducted by excluding each genetic variant from the MR analysis. Furthermore, we conducted other sensitivity analyses, including pleiotropy-robust MR methods (weighted median and MR-Egger) and multivariable MR adjusting for visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volume using GWAS data(8).

Finally, we evaluated the possibility of reverse causation (i.e., pancreatitis causing IPFD rather than IPFD causing pancreatitis) using bidirectional MR. Utilizing genetic variants associated with AP and CP (p<5×10−8)(9), we assessed their association with IPFD using corresponding GWAS data(8).

We considered p<0.05 as statistically significant for our MR analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata18, R version-4.3.3, the TwoSampleMR package, and MendelianRandomization package.

Results

All eight genetic variants were strongly associated with IPFD: mean F-statistics 52 (min 32, max 95). Genetically predicted IPFD was associated with risks for both AP and CP (Figure 1). Per-1 SD increase in IPFD, there was a 40% increased odds of AP (odds ratio [OR] 1.40, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]:1.12-1.76, p=0.0032), and 64% increased odds of CP (OR 1.64, 95%CI:1.13-2.39, p=0.0097). Sensitivity analyses including VAT-adjusted multivariable MR were largely consistent with this finding (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1. Estimates from Sensitivity Mendelian Randomization analyses for the effect of intra-pancreatic fat deposition on acute and chronic pancreatitis
Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1. Mendelian randomization estimates for the effect of intra-pancreatic fat deposition on acute and chronic pancreatitis

aData markers indicate the OR for the association of genetically predicted IPFD with acute pancreatitis or chronic pancreatitis, which was estimated using each genetic variant. Error bars indicate 95% CIs.

bGenetic variants associated with IPFD levels. Mean F-statistic was 52.

cOR (95%CI) of acute pancreatitis or chronic pancreatitis per 1 SD increase in genetically predicted IPFD levels

dRandom-effect inverse-variance weighted method was used to obtain overall estimate for the association of genetically predicted IPFD with pancreatitis. Cochran’s Q values were 8.7 for acute pancreatitis and 14.1 for chronic pancreatitis.

Abbreviations: IPFD, intra-pancreatic fat deposition; Chr, chromosome; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation

Bidirectional MR did not support reverse causation for either AP (p=0.32) or CP (p=0.15) (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2. Bidirectional Mendelian randomization estimates for the effects of acute and chronic pancreatitis on intra-pancreatic fat deposition

aGenetic variants associated with acute pancreatitis or chronic pancreatitis. Mean F-statistics were 65.2 for acute pancreatitis and 60.8 for chronic pancreatitis.

bβ (95%CI) in SD units for the estimated effect of genetically predicted acute pancreatitis or chronic pancreatitis on IPFD.

cData markers indicate the β for the association of genetically predicted acute pancreatitis or chronic pancreatitis with IPFD, which was estimated using each genetic variant. Error bars indicate 95% CIs.

dRandom-effect inverse-variance weighted method was used to obtain overall estimated effect of genetically predicted acute pancreatitis or chronic pancreatitis on IPFD. Cochran’s Q values were 22.3 for acute pancreatitis and 2.7 for chronic pancreatitis.

Abbreviations: IPFD, intra-pancreatic fat deposition; Chr, chromosome; β, β coefficient; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation

Discussion

Our bidirectional MR study provides evidence for a causal impact of IPFD on both AP and CP. This relationship likely exists independently of general visceral fat accumulation, as indicated by the VAT-adjusted multivariable MR analysis.

Based on the findings from our MR study and corroborative evidence from previous observational studies(1, 6, 13), IPFD is likely a pathophysiological contributor to pancreatitis. In addition to several cross-sectional studies(1), a cohort study with about 10,000 participants undergoing ultrasonography with a 6-year follow-up demonstrated an association between IPFD and CP(13). Furthermore, a recent prospective cohort study involving more than 40,000 participants receiving MRI with a 4.6-year follow-up showed an association between IPFD and AP(6). Potential mechanisms linking IPFD to pancreatitis include lipid overload causing cellular stress responses, lipotoxicity, and aberrant cellular crosstalk, leading to the activation of immune cells and stellate cells(1). Notably, IPFD is a modifiable condition and can be reduced, for example, through dietary interventions(14).

One major strength of this study is the use of bidirectional MR and multivariable MR, which are robust approaches that are less susceptible to reverse causation and confounding(4). Furthermore, we utilized data from the largest available GWAS on IPFD. We also used IPFD data measured with MRI, which has been well validated against histological measurements of IPFD(15).

There are some limitations to our study. The unknown mechanism linking the genetic variants, IPFD, and pancreatitis may involve pleiotropic effects. To minimize the influence of potential pleiotropic effects, we confirmed the robustness of our results through several sensitivity analyses. Moreover, this study was limited to individuals of European ancestry.

In conclusion, IPFD is a novel risk factor that likely plays a causal role in the development of pancreatitis. The evidence from our MR study, combined with previous associative data, supports the possibility that reducing IPFD could lower the risk of pancreatitis.

Data Availability

GWAS data for IPFD, VAT, alcohol use, and cholelithiasis are accessible through the GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/). GWAS data for pancreatitis are available from FinnGen (https://www.finngen.fi/en).

Grant support

T32CA229110 (S.A.S) and R00CA256525 (B.Z.H). Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI grants JP22K15685.

Conflict of interest

Outside of the current work, MH reports research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi to the University Hospital of Tübingen, participation in advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, and Amryt, and lecture fees from Amryt, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. L.W. provided consulting service to Pupil Bio, Inc. and reviewed manuscripts for Gastroenterology Report, and received honorarium.

Author contributions

H.Y. designed the study, collected the data, and wrote the draft. H.Y. and S.H. conducted the analysis. H.Y., M.H., R.W., S.F., S.R.G., S.H., L.W., S.A.S., and B.Z.H. reviewed, made critical revisions, and approved the article before submission. H.Y. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Data availability

GWAS data for IPFD, VAT, alcohol use, and cholelithiasis are accessible through the GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/). GWAS data for pancreatitis are available from FinnGen (https://www.finngen.fi/en).

Acknowledgements

We want to acknowledge the participants and investigators of the FinnGen study and UK Biobank.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Petrov MS. Fatty change of the pancreas: the Pandora’s box of pancreatology. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023;8:671–682.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    Wagner R, Eckstein SS, Yamazaki H, et al. Metabolic implications of pancreatic fat accumulation. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2022;18:43–54.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Yamazaki H, Streicher SA, Wu L, et al. Evidence for a causal link between intra-pancreatic fat deposition and pancreatic cancer: A prospective cohort and Mendelian randomization study. Cell Rep Med 2024;5:101391.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Davies NM, Holmes MV, Davey Smith G. Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. BMJ 2018;362:k601.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Bourgault J, Abner E, Manikpurage HD, et al. Proteome-Wide Mendelian Randomization Identifies Causal Links Between Blood Proteins and Acute Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2023;164:953–965 e3.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Dong X, Zhu Q, Yuan C, et al. Associations of Intrapancreatic Fat Deposition With Incident Diseases of the Exocrine and Endocrine Pancreas: A UK Biobank Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119:1158–66.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Mederos MA, Reber HA, Girgis MD. Acute Pancreatitis: A Review. JAMA 2021;325:382–390.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Liu Y, Basty N, Whitcher B, et al. Genetic architecture of 11 organ traits derived from abdominal MRI using deep learning. Elife 2021;10.
  9. 9.↵
    Kurki MI, Karjalainen J, Palta P, et al. FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature 2023;613:508–518.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    Liu M, Jiang Y, Wedow R, et al. Association studies of up to 1.2 million individuals yield new insights into the genetic etiology of tobacco and alcohol use. Nat Genet 2019;51:237–244.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Mbatchou J, Barnard L, Backman J, et al. Computationally efficient whole-genome regression for quantitative and binary traits. Nat Genet 2021;53:1097–1103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Larsson SC, Burgess S, Michaelsson K. Association of Genetic Variants Related to Serum Calcium Levels With Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Infarction. JAMA 2017;318:371–380.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Fujii M, Ohno Y, Yamada M, et al. Impact of fatty pancreas and lifestyle on the development of subclinical chronic pancreatitis in healthy people undergoing a medical checkup. Environ Health Prev Med 2019;24:10.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    Taylor R, Al-Mrabeh A, Zhyzhneuskaya S, et al. Remission of Human Type 2 Diabetes Requires Decrease in Liver and Pancreas Fat Content but Is Dependent upon Capacity for beta Cell Recovery. Cell Metab 2018;28:547–556 e3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Yoon JH, Lee JM, Lee KB, et al. Pancreatic Steatosis and Fibrosis: Quantitative Assessment with Preoperative Multiparametric MR Imaging. Radiology 2016;279:140–50.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 04, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetic Evidence for a Causal Link between Intra-Pancreatic Fat Deposition and Pancreatitis: a Mendelian Randomization Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Genetic Evidence for a Causal Link between Intra-Pancreatic Fat Deposition and Pancreatitis: a Mendelian Randomization Study
Hajime Yamazaki, Martin Heni, Róbert Wagner, Shunichi Fukuhara, Steven R. Grossman, Sihao Han, Lang Wu, Samantha A. Streicher, Brian Z. Huang
medRxiv 2024.06.03.24308330; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.03.24308330
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Genetic Evidence for a Causal Link between Intra-Pancreatic Fat Deposition and Pancreatitis: a Mendelian Randomization Study
Hajime Yamazaki, Martin Heni, Róbert Wagner, Shunichi Fukuhara, Steven R. Grossman, Sihao Han, Lang Wu, Samantha A. Streicher, Brian Z. Huang
medRxiv 2024.06.03.24308330; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.03.24308330

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Gastroenterology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)