Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Routine data collection in home care: A national survey of home care providers in England

View ORCID ProfileV Davey, View ORCID ProfileJ Healey, View ORCID ProfileJ Liddle, View ORCID ProfileB Beresford, View ORCID ProfileS Rand, View ORCID ProfileC Goodman, View ORCID ProfileK Spilsbury, View ORCID ProfileB Hanratty
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.10.24308698
V Davey
1Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, UK
6NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North-East & North Cumbria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for V Davey
  • For correspondence: vanessa.davey{at}newcastle.ac.uk
J Healey
2Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J Healey
J Liddle
1Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, UK
6NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North-East & North Cumbria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J Liddle
B Beresford
2Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B Beresford
S Rand
3Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, UK
7NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Kent Surrey and Sussex, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S Rand
C Goodman
4Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care (CRIPACC), University of Hertfordshire, UK
8NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East of England, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C Goodman
K Spilsbury
5School of Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
9NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Yorkshire and Humber, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K Spilsbury
B Hanratty
1Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, UK
6NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North-East & North Cumbria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B Hanratty
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose Mandatory digital social care records and a standardised schedule for collecting information on home care clients are proposed for regulated adult social care providers in England. This is akin to a minimum dataset (MDS). This study aimed to understand current data collection practices in home care, and identify where support for implementation of an MDS is needed.

Design An online survey of English home care providers was conducted in 2023, asking about the information they collect, store, and share about their clients. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.

Findings One hundred and fifty-five responses were received from home care providers in all regions of England, a majority were for-profit organisations (89%). All collected a range of data on client characteristics and observations about care delivered. Monitoring of changes in client wellbeing and use of standardised measurement tools (e.g. functioning, mood or quality of life) were uncommon. Over two-thirds (71%) reported that they reviewed the content of care packages at least every six months. Providers with a majority of self-funding clients were more likely to regularly update information on care needs and client/ family preferences.

Originality To the best of our knowledge, this is the first national survey of home care providers on their routine data collection practices.

Practical implications Data collection in UK home care will require expansion, to implement an MDS, which has resource implications for providers. Home care staff will need the skills to collect and use data to enhance client care.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This project is funded by the NIHR Health Service Research and Delivery programme (HS&DR NIHR127234) and supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 11, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Routine data collection in home care: A national survey of home care providers in England
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Routine data collection in home care: A national survey of home care providers in England
V Davey, J Healey, J Liddle, B Beresford, S Rand, C Goodman, K Spilsbury, B Hanratty
medRxiv 2024.06.10.24308698; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.10.24308698
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Routine data collection in home care: A national survey of home care providers in England
V Davey, J Healey, J Liddle, B Beresford, S Rand, C Goodman, K Spilsbury, B Hanratty
medRxiv 2024.06.10.24308698; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.10.24308698

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)