Abstract
Background Post-stroke hemiplegia is a common neurological condition with a significant impact on the daily lives of patients, their families, and society. Since motor imagery and execution are supposed to share common neural networks, repeated motor imagery has been used as a common exercise for motor recovery. However, recent meta-analysis has reported inconsistent results. In the present study, we investigated whether real-time feedback of cortical activities estimated from scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) could enhance the efficacy of motor imagery-based rehabilitation in post-stroke hemiplegic patients.
Methods Forty post-stroke chronic hemiplegic patients received 10 days of 40-minute mental practice with motor imagery of the paralyzed hand in addition to 40-minute standard occupational therapy. Patients were randomly allocated to REAL and CTRL groups. In the REAL group, the EEG sensorimotor rhythm recorded over the ipsilesional sensorimotor area were fed back during motor imagery though combination of visual cursor movement, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and robotic movement support. The patients in the CTRL group wore the same EEG headset as the REAL group, but no feedback was provided. The primary outcome was the upper-extremity subscales of the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA). Primary outcomes were tested after 28 days of intervention using analysis of covariance models. This trial is registered with UMIN Clinical Trial Registry, UMIN000026372.
Findings FMA scores showed a significant main effect of time (p = 0·027) with an ANCOVA model considering baseline but not a significant between-group difference. However a significant interaction between time and group (p = 0•037) and greater functional gain in the REAL group (p < 0•001) were found with another model considering patient heterogeneity. The improvement was accompanied with the significant changes in the modulation index of finger extensor muscles in the affected hand in the REAL group. Moreover, imagery-related cortical activation in the sensorimotor area was significantly greater in the REAL group than in the CTRL group. No moderate or serious adverse events were confirmed in both groups.
Interpretation EEG-based brain-computer interface neurofeedback may enhance the efficacy of mental practice with motor imagery and augment motor recovery in poststroke patients with chronic and severe hemiplegia.
Funding Sponsored by AMED under Grant Number JP18hk0102032 and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 20H05923.
Competing Interest Statement
J.U. is a founder and representative director of the university startup company, LIFESCAPES Inc. involved in the research, development, and sales of rehabilitation devices, including brain-computer interfaces. He receives a salary from LIFESCAPES Inc., and holds shares in LIFESCAPES Inc. M.H. and R.Y are employed by LIFESCAPES Inc and receivesa salary from LIFESCAPES Inc. S.I receives a salary from LIFESCAPES Inc. This company does not have any relationships with the device or setup used in the current study. The remaining author declare no competing interests.
Clinical Trial
UMIN000026372
Clinical Protocols
https://www.researchprotocols.org/2018/12/e12339/
Funding Statement
This study was funded by AMED under Grant Number JP18hk0102032 and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 20H05923.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of Keio University Hospital, Japan (D16-03, 2022-1092).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
