Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Innovative COVID-19 Point-of-Care Diagnostics Suitable for Tuberculosis Diagnosis: A Scoping Review

View ORCID ProfileLydia Holtgrewe, View ORCID ProfileSonal Jain, View ORCID ProfileRalitza Dekova, View ORCID ProfileTobias Broger, View ORCID ProfileChris Isaacs, View ORCID ProfilePayam Nahid, View ORCID ProfileAdithya Cattamanchi, View ORCID ProfileClaudia M. Denkinger, View ORCID ProfileSeda Yerlikaya
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.13.24308880
Lydia Holtgrewe
1Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lydia Holtgrewe
  • For correspondence: lmlh1g18{at}soton.ac.uk
Sonal Jain
1Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sonal Jain
Ralitza Dekova
1Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ralitza Dekova
Tobias Broger
1Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tobias Broger
Chris Isaacs
2Connected Diagnostics Limited, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chris Isaacs
Payam Nahid
3UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Payam Nahid
Adithya Cattamanchi
3UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
4Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Adithya Cattamanchi
Claudia M. Denkinger
1Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
5German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Claudia M. Denkinger
Seda Yerlikaya
1Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Seda Yerlikaya
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Rapid and accurate point-of-care (POC) tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics are a key priority to close the TB diagnostic gap of 3.1 million people without a diagnosis. Leveraging the recent surge in COVID-19 diagnostic innovation, we explored the potential adaptation of commercially available SARS-CoV-2 tests for TB diagnosis, aligning with World Health Organization (WHO) target product profiles (TPPs).

Methods A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines to systematically map commercially available POC molecular and antigen SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests potentially meeting the TPPs for TB diagnostic tests for peripheral settings. Data were gathered from PubMed/MEDLINE, bioRxiv, and medRxiv, along with publicly accessible in vitro diagnostic test databases, and developer websites, up to November 23, 2022. Data on developer and test attributes, operational characteristics, pricing, and clinical performance were charted using standardized data extraction forms. Each identified test was evaluated using a standardized scorecard. A narrative synthesis of the charted data is presented.

Results Our database search yielded 2,003 studies, from which 408 were considered eligible. Among these, we identified 58 commercialized diagnostic devices, including 17 near-POC antigen tests, one POC molecular test, 29 near-POC molecular tests, and 11 low-complexity molecular tests. We summarized the detailed characteristics, regulatory status, and clinical performance data of these tests. The LumiraDx (Roche, Switzerland) emerged as the highest- scoring near-POC antigen platform, while Visby (Visby, USA) was the highest-performing near-POC molecular platform. The Lucira Check-It (Pfizer, USA) was noted as the sole POC molecular test. The IdyllaTM (Biocartis, Switzerland) was identified as the leading low- complexity molecular test.

Discussion We highlight a diverse landscape of commercially available diagnostic tests suitable for potential adaptation to TB POC testing. This work aims to bolster global TB initiatives by fostering stakeholder collaboration, leveraging COVID-19 diagnostic technologies for TB diagnosis, and uncovering new commercial avenues to tackle longstanding challenges in TB diagnosis.

Competing Interest Statement

Authors declare no financial conflict of interest. T.B. holds patents in the fields of lipoarabinomannan detection and aerosol collection, and is a shareholder of Avelo Ltd, a Swiss diagnostics company. C.I. is the founder and director of Connected Diagnostics Limited, a UK-based commercial entity that assists companies with the development of diagnostic devices. C.D. is a member of the Scientific Advisory Committee of Avelo Ltd.

Clinical Protocols

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36754560/

Funding Statement

This systematic review is funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (funding reference number U01AI152087; Rapid Research in Diagnostics Development for Tuberculosis Network).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 13, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Innovative COVID-19 Point-of-Care Diagnostics Suitable for Tuberculosis Diagnosis: A Scoping Review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Innovative COVID-19 Point-of-Care Diagnostics Suitable for Tuberculosis Diagnosis: A Scoping Review
Lydia Holtgrewe, Sonal Jain, Ralitza Dekova, Tobias Broger, Chris Isaacs, Payam Nahid, Adithya Cattamanchi, Claudia M. Denkinger, Seda Yerlikaya
medRxiv 2024.06.13.24308880; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.13.24308880
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Innovative COVID-19 Point-of-Care Diagnostics Suitable for Tuberculosis Diagnosis: A Scoping Review
Lydia Holtgrewe, Sonal Jain, Ralitza Dekova, Tobias Broger, Chris Isaacs, Payam Nahid, Adithya Cattamanchi, Claudia M. Denkinger, Seda Yerlikaya
medRxiv 2024.06.13.24308880; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.13.24308880

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)