Abstract
Food preferences play a pivotal role in dietary choices and body weight regulation, yet the causal relationships and complex pathways linking food liking to obesity remain elusive. Here, we employed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis and pleiotropic analysis to explore the causalities and shared loci between 187 food preferences (N=161,625) and five obesity-related phenotypes (N=100,716 to 322,154). MR analysis revealed a causal association between two food-liking phenotypes and increased body mass index (BMI), specifically, onion liking (β, 0.286; 95% CI, 0.185 to 0.387; P = 2.80×10−8), and highly palatable food liking (β, 0.266; 95% CI, 0.140 to 0.391; P = 3.31×10−5). Multivariable MR analysis indicated that the impact of onion liking on BMI persisted even after conditioning on actual onion intake, suggesting a degree of independence in dietary preferences’ influence. Pleiotropic analysis under a composite null hypothesis detected 32 pleiotropic loci and six colocalized loci in these two trait pairs. Candidate pleiotropic genes associated with onion liking-BMI highlighted biological pathways primarily involved in the sensory perception of smell. These findings enhance our comprehension of the intricate relationship between food preferences and obesity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82101601, 82071190, 82371438), the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University High level Talent Research Launch Project (GCC2022001), the Innovative Strong School Project of Guangdong Medical University (4SG21230G), and the Open Fund of Guangdong Key Laboratory of Age-Related Cardiac and Cerebral Diseases (2023).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Author affiliations updated; supplemental files updated.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
