Abstract
Background Biomarkers would greatly assist chronic pain management. The present study aimed to undertake analytical validation of a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain consisting of two measures: sensorimotor peak alpha frequency (PAF) and corticomotor excitability (CME), using a human model of prolonged temporomandibular pain (masseter intramuscular injection of nerve growth factor [NGF]).
Methods 150 participants received an injection of NGF to the right masseter muscle on Days 0 and 2, inducing prolonged pain lasting up to 4 weeks. Electroencephalography (EEG) to assess PAF and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess CME were recorded on Days 0, 2 and 5. We determined the predictive accuracy of the PAF/CME biomarker signature using a nested control-test scheme: machine learning models were run on a training set (n = 100), where PAF and CME were predictors and pain sensitivity was the outcome. The winning classifier was assessed on a test set (n = 50) comparing the predicted pain labels against the true labels.
Results The winning classifier was logistic regression, with an outstanding area under the curve (AUC=1.00). The locked model assessed on the test set had excellent performance (AUC=0.88). Results were reproduced across a range of methodological parameters and inclusion of covariates in the modelling. PAF and CME biomarkers showed good-excellent test-retest reliability.
Conclusions This study provides evidence for a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for an episode of prolonged pain. The combination of accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability, suggests the PAF/CME biomarker signature has substantial potential for clinical translation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project was funded by the National Institute of Health (R61 NS113269/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained from the University of New South Wales (HC190206) and the University of Maryland Baltimore (HP-00085371).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Co-first author
↵** Co-senior author
Data availability statement: The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request
Disclosures: This project was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R61 NS113269/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States). The authors have no conflicts to declare.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
