Abstract
The haematological malignancy multiple myeloma is associated with skewed T-cell activation and function. T-cell alterations are detectable in asymptomatic myeloma precursor conditions and have the potential to identify precursor patients at imminent risk of progression. However, what myeloma-associated T-cells alterations represent mechanistically, how they relate to tumour burden and gene expression, and what influences high inter-patient variability in immune composition remains unknown. Here, we assembled the largest ever dataset of published and newly-generated single-cell RNA and TCR sequencing of the marrow and blood from patients with myeloma, precursor conditions, and age-matched non-cancer controls. We show myeloma is not associated with T-cell exhaustion and instead defined by a pattern of T-cell differentiation resembling antigen-driven terminal memory differentiation. Myeloma-associated T-cell differentiation was dependent on tumour-intrinsic features including tumour burden and tumour expression of antigen-presentation genes. Expanded TCR clones accumulating in myeloma were not enriched for viral specificity and were detected in effector states in highly infiltrated marrows. Together, these results suggest anti-tumour immunity drives a novel form of cancer-associated T-cell memory differentiation in myeloma.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by CRUK, the Medical Research Council, and the UCL/UCLH Biomedical Research Centre.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of Health Research Authority UK (Research ethics committee references: 07/Q0502/17, 07/Q0502/17) gave ethical approval for this work. Ethics committee of the London Central Research Ethics Committee (20/LO/0238) gave ethical approval for this work. Ethics committee of the London City and East Research Ethics Committee (London, UK; date of favourable ethical opinion Feb 23, 2015) gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Minor edit to Fig.2A correcting “1,016,900 T cells” to “459,755 T cells”. Edit figures to prevent cropping at top of page. Omission of one individual from the acknowledgements.
