Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Reproducibility of radiomic features of the brain on ultrahigh-resolution MRI at 7 Tesla: a comparison of different segmentation techniques

Julian H. Klinger, Doris Leithner, Sungmin Woo, Michael Weber, H. Alberto Vargas, Marius E. Mayerhoefer
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.24.24308597
Julian H. Klinger
1Dept. of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Doris Leithner
2Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sungmin Woo
2Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Weber
1Dept. of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Alberto Vargas
2Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marius E. Mayerhoefer
1Dept. of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
2Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: marius.mayerhoefer{at}nyulangone.org
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objectives To determine the impact of segmentation techniques on radiomic features extracted from ultrahigh-field (UHF) MRI of the brain.

Materials and Methods Twenty-one 7T MRI scans of the brain, including a 3D magnetization-prepared two rapid acquisition gradient echo (MP2RAGE) T1-weighted sequence with an isotropic 0.63 mm³ voxel size, were analyzed. Radiomic features (histogram, texture, and shape; total n=101) from six brain regions -cerebral gray and white matter, basal ganglia, ventricles, cerebellum, and brainstem-were extracted from segmentation masks constructed with four different techniques: the iGT (reference standard), based on a custom pipeline that combined automatic segmentation tools and expert reader correction; the deep-learning algorithm Cerebrum-7T; the Freesurfer-v7 software suite; and the Nighres algorithm. Principal components (PCs) were calculated for histogram and texture features. To test the reproducibility of radiomic features, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to compare Cerebrum-7, Freesurfer-v7, and Nighres to the iGT, respectively.

Results For histogram PCs, median ICCs for Cerebrum-7T, Freesurfer-v7, and Nighres were 0.99, 0.42, and 0.11 for the gray matter; 0.84, 0.25, and 0.43 for the basal ganglia; 0.89, 0.063, and 0.036 for the white matter; 0.84, 0.21, and 0.33 for the ventricles; 0.94, 0.64, and 0.93 for the cerebellum; and 0.78, 0.21, and 0.53 for the brainstem. For texture PCs, median ICCs for Cerebrum-7T, Freesurfer-v7, and Nighres were 0.95, 0.21, and 0.15 for the gray matter; 0.70, 0.36, and 0.023 for the basal ganglia; 0.91, 0.25, and 0.023 for the white matter; 0.80, 0.75, and 0.59 for the ventricles; 0.95, 0.43, and 0.86 for the cerebellum; and 0.72, 0.39, and 0.46 for the brainstem. For shape features, median ICCs for Cerebrum-7T, FreeSurfer-v7, and Nighres were 0.99, 0.91, and 0.36 for the gray matter; 0.89, 0.90, and 0.13 for the basal ganglia; 0.98, 0.91, and 0.027 for the white matter; 0.91, 0.91, and 0.36 for the ventricles; 0.80, 0.68, and 0.47 for the cerebellum; and 0.79, 0.17, and 0.15 for the brainstem.

Conclusions Radiomic features in UHF MRI of the brain show substantial variability depending on the segmentation algorithm. The deep learning algorithm Cerebrum-7T enabled the highest reproducibility. Dedicated software tools for UHF MRI may be needed to achieve more stable results.

Competing Interest Statement

M.E.M. received honoraria for lectures from Siemens, General Electric, and Bristol Myers Squibb. The other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study used (or will use) ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at: https://search.kg.ebrains.eu/instances/Dataset/2b24466d-f1cd-4b66-afa8-d70a6755ebea

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: M.E.M. received honoraria for lectures from Siemens, General Electric, and Bristol Myers Squibb. The other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

https://search.kg.ebrains.eu/instances/Dataset/2b24466d-f1cd-4b66-afa8-d70a6755ebea

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 24, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reproducibility of radiomic features of the brain on ultrahigh-resolution MRI at 7 Tesla: a comparison of different segmentation techniques
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Reproducibility of radiomic features of the brain on ultrahigh-resolution MRI at 7 Tesla: a comparison of different segmentation techniques
Julian H. Klinger, Doris Leithner, Sungmin Woo, Michael Weber, H. Alberto Vargas, Marius E. Mayerhoefer
medRxiv 2024.06.24.24308597; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.24.24308597
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Reproducibility of radiomic features of the brain on ultrahigh-resolution MRI at 7 Tesla: a comparison of different segmentation techniques
Julian H. Klinger, Doris Leithner, Sungmin Woo, Michael Weber, H. Alberto Vargas, Marius E. Mayerhoefer
medRxiv 2024.06.24.24308597; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.24.24308597

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Radiology and Imaging
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)