Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that severely impacts affected persons’ speech and motor functions, yet early detection and tracking of disease progression remain challenging. The current gold standard for monitoring ALS progression, the ALS functional rating scale - revised (ALSFRS-R), is based on subjective ratings of symptom severity, and may not capture subtle but clinically meaningful changes due to a lack of granularity. Multimodal speech measures which can be automatically collected from patients in a remote fashion allow us to bridge this gap because they are continuous-valued and therefore, potentially more granular at capturing disease progression. Here we investigate the responsiveness and sensitivity of multimodal speech measures in persons with ALS (pALS) collected via a remote patient monitoring platform in an effort to quantify how long it takes to detect a clinically-meaningful change associated with disease progression. We recorded audio and video from 278 participants and automatically extracted multimodal speech biomarkers (acoustic, orofacial, linguistic) from the data. We find that the timing alignment of pALS speech relative to a canonical elicitation of the same prompt and the number of words used to describe a picture are the most responsive measures at detecting such change in both pALS with bulbar (n = 36) and non-bulbar onset (n = 107). Interestingly, the responsiveness of these measures is stable even at small sample sizes. We further found that certain speech measures are sensitive enough to track bulbar decline even when there is no patient-reported clinical change, i.e. the ALSFRS-R speech score remains unchanged at 3 out of a total possible score of 4. The findings of this study have the potential to facilitate improved, accelerated and cost-effective clinical trials and care.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors are full-time employees of Modality.AI and hold stock options in the company. Modality did not influence or restrict the submission of this publication.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant R42DC019877.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of Versiti Clinical Trials (Salus IRB) gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data used in the present study is not publicly available.