Abstract
Purpose The goal of this study is to enhance automated medical coding (AMC) by evaluating the effectiveness of modern embedding models in capturing semantic similarity and improving the retrieval process for ICD-10-CM code mapping. Achieving consistent and accurate medical coding practices is crucial for effective healthcare management.
Methods We compared the performance of embedding models, including text-embedding-3-large, text-embedding-004, voyage-large-2-instruct, and mistralembed, against ClinicalBERT. These models were assessed for their ability to capture semantic similarity between long and short ICD-10-CM descriptions and to improve the retrieval process for mapping diagnosis strings from the eICU database to the correct ICD-10-CM codes.
Results The text-embedding-3-large and text-embedding-004 models outperformed ClinicalBERT in capturing semantic similarity, with text-embedding-3-large achieving the highest accuracy. For ICD-10 code retrieval, the voyage-large-2-instruct model demonstrated the best performance. Using the 15 nearest neighbors provided the best results. Increasing the number beyond this did not improve accuracy due to a lack of meaningful information.
Conclusion Modern embedding models significantly outperform specialized models like ClinicalBERT in AMC tasks. These findings underscore the potential of these models to enhance medical coding practices, in spite of the challenges with ambiguous diagnosis descriptions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was not funded.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data will be available upon request.
