Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third globally in cancer-related mortality, with rising incidence, particularly in Asia, projecting a 60% surge by 2030. Metastatic CRC (mCRC) presents a significant challenge with a grim 5-year survival rate of 14%. Emerging evidence suggests that tumors with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) respond well to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), marking a paradigm shift in therapeutic approaches. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to comprehensively assess Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, and the combination of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in advanced CRC, considering their significant antitumor efficacy in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC.
Methods Following PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane Handbook standards, this study covers 2014 to 2024, involving advanced CRC patients treated with ICIs. A comprehensive literature search employed 12 independent authors across eight databases. Parameters such as overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate were extracted.The Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias version 2 tool assessed risk. Statistical analysis utilized mean difference and risk ratios with random-effect models due to anticipated heterogeneity. Robustness was ensured through publication bias analysis and sensitivity meta-analysis. Linear regression explored associations in subgroup analysis.
Results The meta-analysis evaluated ORR and OS across different immunotherapy interventions. Nivolumab, Nivolumab+Ipilimumab, and Pembrolizumab exhibited varying ORR and OS effect sizes with corresponding heterogeneity levels. Progression-free survival (PFS) analysis also showed diverse effect sizes and heterogeneity levels across the three interventions. The study provides a comprehensive overview of response rates and survival outcomes for these immunotherapies in advanced CRC.
Conclusions The study concludes that combination immunotherapy, particularly Nivolumab and Ipilimumab, presents a promising avenue for advanced CRC treatment, showing superior efficacy. Pembrolizumab monotherapy also exhibited promise. While the study offers valuable insights, the identified heterogeneity emphasizes the need for additional research. Adverse effects were generally low, supporting the viability of the studied immunotherapies. The study acknowledges limitations and calls for ongoing investigation to refine and validate these findings, marking a pioneering effort in systematically comparing short-term and long-term effects of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapies in CRC.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files
