Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Machine learning is more accurate and biased than risk scoring tools in the prediction of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

Joyce C Ho, Shalmali Joshi, Eduardo Valverde, Kathryn Wood, Kendra Grubb, Miguel Leal, Vicki Stover Hertzberg
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.05.24310013
Joyce C Ho
1Department of Computer Science, Emory University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: joyce.c.ho{at}emory.edu
Shalmali Joshi
2Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eduardo Valverde
3Department of Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn Wood
4School of Nursing, Emory University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kendra Grubb
5School of Medicine, Emory University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miguel Leal
5School of Medicine, Emory University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vicki Stover Hertzberg
4School of Nursing, Emory University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery remains high and is associated with adverse patient outcomes. Risk scoring tools have been developed to predict POAF, yet discrimination performance remains moderate. Machine learning (ML) models can achieve better performance but may exhibit performance heterogeneity across race and sex subpopulations. We evaluate 8 risk scoring tools and 6 ML models on a heterogeneous cohort derived from electronic health records. Our results suggest that ML models achieve higher discrimination yet are less fair, especially with respect to race. Our findings highlight the need for building accurate and fair ML models to facilitate consistent and equitable assessment of POAF risk.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by NIH Award 1R21HL156184.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study on de-identified data was approved by the Emory University Institutional Review Board.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • ↵† sj3261{at}cumc.columbia.edu

  • ↵‡ evalverde3{at}gatech.edu

  • ↵§ kathryn.wood{at}emory.edu

  • ↵¶ kendra.janel.grubb{at}emory.edu

  • ↵⊠ miguel.a.leal{at}emory.edu

  • ↵** vhertzb{at}emory.edu

Data Availability

Data provided in the present study are not available but the code used is available.

  • Abbreviations

    POAF
    post-operative atrial fibrillation
    AUROC
    area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
    ML
    machine learning
    SVM
    support vector machines
    GBM
    gradient boosting machines
    RF
    random forests
    CABG
    coronary artery bypass graft
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted July 07, 2024.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Machine learning is more accurate and biased than risk scoring tools in the prediction of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Machine learning is more accurate and biased than risk scoring tools in the prediction of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery
    Joyce C Ho, Shalmali Joshi, Eduardo Valverde, Kathryn Wood, Kendra Grubb, Miguel Leal, Vicki Stover Hertzberg
    medRxiv 2024.07.05.24310013; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.05.24310013
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Machine learning is more accurate and biased than risk scoring tools in the prediction of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery
    Joyce C Ho, Shalmali Joshi, Eduardo Valverde, Kathryn Wood, Kendra Grubb, Miguel Leal, Vicki Stover Hertzberg
    medRxiv 2024.07.05.24310013; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.05.24310013

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Health Informatics
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)