Abstract
Oxygen saturation is a crucial metric used for monitoring patients with lung disease or other conditions who are at risk of hypoxemia. Recently, consumer wearable devices began incorporating oxygen saturation measurement tools, widening their use among individuals with lung disease. However, their performance has not been well characterized, particularly during blood oxygen desaturation, due to limitations in collecting comparison arterial blood gas measurements during exercise-induced hypoxemia. To address this knowledge gap, we performed a controlled oxygen desaturation study in nine healthy participants to mimic exercise-induced hypoxemia, reducing the blood oxygen saturation levels from 100% to 60% using a gas delivery system. We conducted a comparative analysis of the displayed oxygen saturation readings of both the Masimo MightySat Rx finger pulse oximeter and Apple Watch Series 7 with arterial blood oxygen saturation readings obtained from arterial blood gas samples. Both the Masimo MightySat Rx pulse oximeter and the Apple Watch Series 7 tended to overestimate the oxygen saturation. The Masimo pulse oximeter readings were more likely to fall within the acceptable error range than the Apple Watch (49.03% compared to 32.14%). Notably, both devices have limitations under low oxygen saturation levels (<88%) with an error of 1.96% and 4.99% for the Masimo and Apple Watch, respectively. Among the oxygen desaturation measurements at a desaturation rate larger than two percent per minute, a rate which is clinically correlated to sleep apnea, both devices increased their error slightly by 0.29% and 1.80% respectively for the Masimo and Apple Watch. However, no statistically significant increase was found.
Author Summary Blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) is an important measurement for monitoring patients with acute and chronic conditions that are associated with hypoxemia, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, and sleep apnea. While smartwatches may provide a novel method for continuous and unobtrusive SpO2 monitoring, it is necessary to understand their accuracy and limitations to ensure that they are used in a fit-for-purpose manner, especially under conditions of low oxygen saturation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The protocol is approved by Duke University Health System IRB: Pro00105579
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Deidentified data used for submission is available after acceptance.
