Abstract
Background Compared to healthy individuals, patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are found to rely more on model-free decision-making strategies which may underlie symptom expression. It is, however, unclear whether these behavioural differences are represented in neural alterations of model-free and model-based decision-making when tested simultaneously.
Methods We investigated the neural signatures of 22 OCD patients and 22 matched controls who completed a two-step Markov decision-making task during functional MRI scanning. We used hierarchical Bayesian modelling and Bayesian statistics to examine model-based and model-free decision-making behaviours. Parametric regressors were employed for model-free and model-based reward prediction errors to inform neural reward presentation, which we analysed using a Bayesian Multilevel Modeling (BML) approach. Associations between significant activations and symptoms as well as cognitive scores were explored using Bayesian linear regression.
Results While controls received significantly more rewards and were significantly less stochastic compared to patients, both groups similarly relied on model-free decision-making strategies. Importantly, our group comparison of neural reward prediction error responses showed greater activation for model-based reward prediction error in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in OCD patients compared to controls, but no differences for model-free reward prediction error processing. Increased mPFC activity was associated with lower depressive symptoms but not with other clinical or cognitive scores.
Conclusion These findings support the notion that OCD is associated with a bias towards habitual behaviour, which may be expressed through altered mPFC activity underlying goal-directed behaviour. Tackling the hyperactivity on the mPFC may provide a new target for optimised treatment and interventions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of the Technical University of Munich gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
