Abstract
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) has gained widespread acceptance as a useful tool to measure sleep quality. In order to formulate the diagnosis process, it is essential that we understand the factor structure inherent in the PSQI data. In this work, we seek to estimate such a structure with a focus on the Indian Information Technology (IT) workers. We have used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) for this purpose. Instead of using random imputation to handle the frequently occurring missing values, we have used more sophisticated techniques thereby improving the accuracy of our results. We have also used the Multi layer perceptron based method to see how we can classify the sleep quality of the sampled population. We have discovered that, contrary to the general perception, most Indian IT employees have sleep quality belonging to good and very good classes.
Author summary Arindam Chatterjee - Curently Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Engineering, Heritage Institute of Technology, Kolkata. Arindam has almost 16 years of teaching and research experience. In past he has worked in the industry for eight years. Area of academic interest is Impact of Information Technology on Indian Financial and Social sectors.
Rimu Chaudhuri -Currently Professor of Economics, Heritage Business School, Kolkata. Rimu is having teaching experience of almost 16yrs and research experience of 20 yrs. Area of academic / research interest is Entrepreneurship Development and for last couple of years Rimu is working in the field of Gender and Environment Sustainability. Last couple of years Rimu has worked extensively on Social Impact of IT. Rimu is also the President of Institution’s Innovation Council of Heritage Business School.
Arijit is a software engineer at Bloomberg LP, with a Master’s degree in Computer Science from the University of Florida. He specializes in creating and maintaining low-latency, high-performant, and robust backend applications. Arijit has a keen interest in Distributed Systems and Software Development. Currently, he contributes his expertise to the ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) sector, managing proprietary datasets and developing services that handle millions of requests per day. His work ensures efficient and reliable data management in a high-demand environment.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The approval was provided by the "Institutional Ethics Committe" Heritage Institute of Technology, Kolkata, India via memo no: HIT/IEC/2020/002/2020 dated: 10th November, 2020. The following documents were reviewed in the process: 1. Study protocol 2. Questionnaire 3. Informed consent (verbal) 4. Proposed methods and material of the study The certicicate is available in scanned PDF form also. This can be shared upon requested. For yor reference, the first author is an employee of Heritage Institute of Technology, Kolkata, India.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data cannot be shared publicly because of privacy reasons. But if required can be shared with some limitations.
