ABSTRACT
Background Target trial emulation (TTE) has gained popularity in evaluating treatments and health interventions. Its application to infectious disease outcomes requires careful consideration, as infectious disease transmission violates the assumption of no interference. We conducted a scoping review to understand how TTE approaches have been applied to vaccine evaluation.
Methods We conducted a systematic search of literature published in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until May 2024, using keywords related to TTE, infectious diseases, and vaccines. Three independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts for relevance. Full-text articles meeting inclusion criteria were further assessed for eligibility.
Results Our keyword-based search and citation search identified a total of 240 studies. Of these, 34 original research studies used TTE approaches to evaluate vaccines, predominantly published from 2022 to 2024. Most studies (n=32, 94%) were conducted in high-income countries. The majority (n=31, 91%) evaluated the effect of COVID-19 vaccines, with one study each evaluating influenza, mpox, and rotavirus vaccines. Nationwide healthcare databases were used in 17 studies (50%). Twenty-one studies (62%) conducted analysis among adults aged ≥18 years, while six studies (18%) focused on children <18 years. Most studies did not define which of the four effects of vaccination they evaluated (direct, indirect, total, or overall effect), and none incorporated interference in vaccine evaluation.
Conclusions Our review highlights the increasing popularity of TTE in vaccine evaluation following the COVID-19 pandemic. Further discussions are needed to establish TTE approaches to estimating four effects of vaccination, using large, routinely collected data.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was also made possible by cooperative agreement CDC-RFA-FT-23-0069 from the CDC's Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Papers identified by citation search have been added.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
