Abstract
Importance In mental healthcare, the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance psychoeducation is a burgeoning field. This study explored the potential of ChatGPT as an individualized psychoeducational support tool specifically for psychosis education.
Objective The study aims to evaluate psychosis-related questions to provide accurate, clear, and clinically relevant individualized information for patients and caregivers.
Design This cross-sectional study uses a qualitative analysis design. The researchers specifically employed a question-answering system (GPT-4 via ChatGPT) to generate responses to common questions about psychosis. Experts in the field then evaluated these responses to assess their quality for use in a clinical setting.
Primary Outcome Researchers presented ChatGPT with 20 common questions frequently asked by patients’ caregivers and relatives. Two experts in psychosis then assessed the quality of the responses using six criteria: accuracy (1-3), clarity (1-3), inclusivity (1-3), completeness (0-1), clinical utility (1-5) and an overall score (1-4).
Results The evaluation yielded positive results overall. Responses were rated as accurate (M±SD= 2.89±0.22) and clear (mean score of 2.93±0.18). There was potential for improvement in terms of inclusivity (mean score of 2.30±0.41), suggesting a need to incorporate more diverse perspectives. Completeness received high ratings (mean score of 0.93±0.18), indicating responses addressed all aspects of the questions. Most importantly, the responses were deemed clinically useful (mean score of 4.35±0.52).
Conclusions In summary, this study underscores the significant promise of ChatGPT as a psychoeducational tool for patients with psychosis, their relatives, and their caregivers. The experts’ findings affirm that the information delivered by ChatGPT is not only accurate and clinically relevant but also conveyed conversationally, enhancing its accessibility and usability. The initial performance of ChatGPT as a psychoeducational tool in the context of psychosis education is undeniably positive.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used simulated data by the study research team.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
