Abstract
Successful integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) into healthcare requires understanding of health professionals’ perspectives, ideally through data-driven approaches. In this study, we use a semi-structured survey and mixed methods analyses to explore clinicians’ perceptions on the utility of generative AI for all types of clinical tasks, familiarity and competency with generative AI tools, and sentiments regarding the potential impact of generative AI on healthcare. Analysis of 116 clinician responses found differing perceptions regarding the usefulness of generative AI across clinical workflows, with information gathering from external sources rated highest and communication rated lowest. Clinician-generated prompt suggestions focused most often on clinician decision making and were of mixed quality, with participants more familiar with generative AI suggesting more high-quality prompts. Sentiments regarding the impact of generative AI varied, particularly regarding trustworthiness and impact on bias. Thematic analysis of open-ended comments highlighted concerns about patient care and the role of clinicians.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of Columbia University Medical Center gave ethical Approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
