Abstract
Rationale IL-4 receptor (IL-4R)-mediated alternative activation of macrophage drives type 2 airway inflammation. Cadherin-26 (CDH26) upregulates epithelial type II IL-4R signaling in asthma. However, whether CDH26 contributes to type I IL-4R-mediated macrophage activation and the mechanism by which CDH26 upregulates IL-4R expression remains unknown.
Objectives To investigate whether CDH26 promotes macrophage alternative activation via suppressing IL-4Rα ubiquitination-proteasomal degradation.
Methods CDH26 expression in bronchoalveolar lavage cells of asthma patients was examined using quantitative PCR and immunostaining. Airway inflammation and macrophage activation were assessed in ovalbumin-sensitized and challenged macrophage-specific Cdh26-deficient mice. Mechanistic experiments included IL-4Rα degradation and ubiquitination assay, CDH26 co-immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry analysis. Cdh26 siRNA encapsulated lipid nanoparticles were used to treat the mouse model.
Measurements and Results CDH26 expression was enhanced in bronchoalveolar lavage cells from patients with eosinophilic asthma and was localized to lung macrophages. Airway eosinophilia, mucus overproduction and macrophage alternative activation were significantly suppressed in ovalbumin-challenged macrophage-specific Cdh26-deficient mice compared to control mice. Cdh26 deficiency inhibits IL-4Rα expression and STAT6 phosphorylation in macrophages in vitro. Furthermore, CDH26 knockdown enhances whereas CDH26 overexpression suppresses IL-4Rα ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mechanistically, CDH26 directly interacts with STUB1 and suppresses the binding of STUB1 to IL-4Rα and subsequent ubiquitination-proteasomal degradation. Cdh26 siRNA encapsulated lipid nanoparticles markedly alleviate airway inflammation, mucus overproduction and macrophage alternative activation in the mouse model.
Conclusions CDH26 interacts with STUB1 and suppresses STUB1-mediated IL-4Rα ubiquitination-proteasomal degradation, thereby amplifying IL-4R signaling in macrophages in asthma. CDH26 is a potential therapeutic target for asthma.
Scientific knowledge on the subject IL-4R signaling drives macrophage alternative activation, mucous cell metaplasia, and type 2 airway inflammation in asthma, but the regulatory mechanism underlying IL-4R expression remains unclear.
What this study adds to the field CDH26 expression is enhanced in lung macrophages from patients with eosinophilic asthma. Macrophage-specific Cdh26 deficiency suppresses macrophage alternative activation and airway eosinophilia in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation. CDH26 directly interacts with STUB1 and suppresses STUB1-mediated IL-4Rα ubiquitination-proteasomal degradation, resulting in sustained activation of IL-4R signaling. Lipid nanoparticles encapsulating Cdh26 siRNA effectively alleviate airway eosinophilia and mucus overproduction in the mouse model.
Introduction
Asthma is a chronic airway disease that characterized by airway inflammation, mucus overproduction, airway remodeling, and airway hyperresponsiveness (1). Asthma affects approximately 358 million people worldwide and is among the top five respiratory diseases posing a threat to global health (2). Severe asthma imposes significant burdens on individuals and society, with the potential for fatal outcomes (3). Eosinophilic airway inflammation driven by type 2 immune response is commonly observed in severe asthma patients (4).
Macrophages play an important role in environmental allergen-induced airway inflammation in asthma (5). Macrophages exhibit different activation states in response to various stimuli (6). When activated by microbes-induced factors such as interferon-γ and reactive oxygen species, macrophages switch to a pro-inflammatory state named as classical activation (M1 macrophages) and eliminate engulfed microbes (7). On the other hand, when activated by allergen-induced type 2 cytokines including IL-4 and IL-13, macrophages are alternatively activated (M2 macrophages) to promote tissue repair, remodeling, and wound healing (8). Macrophage alternative activation is involved in the development of allergic diseases including asthma (9). Alternatively activated macrophages release high levels of IL-13 and chemokines including CCL17, CCL18, CCL22, and CCL24, which activate Th2 cells and promote eosinophilic inflammation (10).
The IL-4R-STAT6 signaling pathway plays a crucial role in the alternative activation of macrophages (11). There are two types of IL-4R (12). Type I IL-4R consists of IL-4Rα and IL-2Rγ (γc) subunits and is expressed in hematopoietic cells including lymphocytes and macrophages (13). Type II IL-4R, composed of IL-4Rα and IL-13Rα1 subunits, is present in hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cells including airway epithelial cells and smooth muscle cells (14). Type I IL-4R specifically binds to IL-4, leading to downstream JAK1-STAT6 activation and macrophages alternative activation (15). Meanwhile, the occupied IL-4R is degraded to terminate and prevent sustained activation of IL-4R signaling. There are several mechanisms underlying IL-4R degradation including endocytosis and ubiquitin-proteasome system(16–18). Wei and colleagues demonstrated that STIP1 homology and U-box-containing protein 1 (STUB1), an E3 ligase, interacts with IL-4Rα, a subunit shared by type I and type II IL-4R, to lead to its ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation (17).
Cadherin family members including cadherin-1 play important roles in maintaining the adhesive connections between airway epithelial cells as well as regulating epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation (19). CDH26, a non-classical member of cadherin family, contributes to apicobasal polarization of airway epithelial cells (20). CDH26 has long been associated to type 2 inflammation-related diseases including asthma, helminth infection, eosinophilic gastritis, and esophagitis (21–24), but the precise role of CDH26 in these diseases is unclear. We recently reported that CDH26 promotes airway eosinophilia and mucus overproduction via upregulating epithelial type II IL-4R signaling (25). However, whether CDH26 contributes to type I IL-4R-mediated macrophage activation and the mechanism by which CDH26 upregulates IL-4R expression remains unknown.
In this study, we observed elevated CDH26 expression in lung macrophages from patients with eosinophilic asthma. Macrophage-specific Cdh26 deficiency significantly suppressed macrophage alternative activation, airway eosinophilia, and mucus overproduction in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation. CDH26 knockdown or overexpression accelerated or inhibited IL-4Rα proteasomal degradation in vitro, respectively. Mechanistically, CDH26 interacts with STUB1 to suppress its binding to IL-4Rα, thus inhibiting IL-4Rα ubiquitination and degradation. Intriguingly, Cdh26 siRNA encapsulated lipid nanoparticles effectively alleviated airway eosinophilia and mucus overproduction in the mouse model.
Materials and methods
For additional information on the materials and methods used in this study, please refer to the online supplementary materials.
Subjects
We recruited 17 control subjects, 25 eosinophilic asthma patients (sputum eosinophils > 3%), and 7 non-eosinophilic asthma patients (sputum eosinophil ≤ 3%) (26). All participants provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by the ethics committee of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
Murine model of allergic airway inflammation
Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice on a C57BL/6N background were generated and provided by GemPharmatech (Nanjing, China). Exon 4 of Cdh26 gene was deleted in Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice. All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed using Prism version 8 (GraphPad Software). For normally distributed data, we calculated the means ± standard deviation (SD) and performed Student’s t test or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test to compare across groups. For non-normally distributed data, we calculated medians with interquartile ranges and performed Mann-Whitney test. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
Results
1. CDH26 expression is upregulated in lung macrophages from eosinophilic asthma patients
We initially examined the expression of CDH26 in BAL cells from our cohort of mild-moderate asthma (n=32) and control subjects (n=17). The transcript levels of CDH26 in BAL cells were determined using quantitative PCR. CDH26 transcript levels were significantly higher in BAL cells from asthma patients compared to control subjects (Figure 1A). We further classified asthma patients as eosinophilic asthma (n=25, sputum eosinophils > 3%) and non-eosinophilic asthma (n=7, sputum eosinophils ≤ 3%) (26). CDH26 transcript levels were significantly higher in BAL cells from eosinophilic asthma patients compared to control subjects, but no significant difference was observed between non-eosinophilic asthma patients and control subjects (Figure 1B). Moreover, CDH26 transcript levels in BAL cells of asthma patients showed a strong correlation with fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) (rs=0.6038, p=0.0004), an indicator of airway eosinophilia (Figure 1C). CDH26 transcript levels were also correlated with sputum eosinophil percentages and serum IgE (Figures 1D, E1E). Additionally, the transcript levels of CDH26, CD206, FIZZ1 and CCL17, molecular markers for macrophage alternative activation, were all significantly increased in sputum cells from asthma patients compared to control subjects (Figures E1A-E1D).
A-B) CDH26 transcript levels in BAL cells from eosinophilic asthmatics (n=25), non-eosinophilic asthmatics (n=7) and control subjects (n=17) were measured by quantitative PCR. The transcript levels were expressed as log2 transformed and relative to the mean value for control subjects. C-D) Spearman’s correlation assays between CDH26 transcripts in BAL cells and FeNO, induced sputum eosinophil (%) of asthma patients. E) Representative images of CDH26 immumohistochemical staining in BAL cells from asthmatics (n=4) and control subjects (n=4). F) The proportion of CDH26+ cells in BAL cells from asthma patients (n=4) and control subjects (n=4). G) The expression levels of CDH26 in a microarray data (GSE76262) using sputum cells from subjects with mild-moderate (n=25) and severe asthma (n=49) were analyzed. H-I) Representative images for immunofluorescence staining of CDH26 (green) and CD68 (red) in BAL cells from asthma patients (n=4) and control subjects (n=4). Arrows indicate enlarged, foamy, and granular macrophages. Nuclei was stained with DAPI (blue). Quantification for relative immunofluorescent intensity of CDH26 compared to CD68 was performed using ImageJ. J) The expression of CDH26 in isolated alveolar macrophages from asthma patients and control subjects (GSE2125). E-F) Data are mean ± SD. *p<0.05; **p<0.01. Abbreviations: CDH26, cadherin-26; FeNO, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide.
We next examined the expression of CDH26 in BAL cells using immunohistochemistry and found a significant increase in the number of CDH26-expressing cells in BAL cells from asthma patients (n=4) compared to control subjects (n=4) (Figures 1E-1F). Immunofluorescence staining of BAL cells with CDH26 and CD68, a marker for macrophages, revealed that CDH26 was localized to enlarged foamy CD68-expressing cells, and the fluorescent intensity of CDH26 relative to CD68 was markedly increased in asthma patients (Figures 1H-1I). Of note, the CDH26+CD68+ cells from asthma patients exhibited an enlarged, foamy, and granular morphology, which was previously reported to be associated with alternative activation of macrophages (27). This suggests that CDH26 is expressed in activated macrophages and its expression is upregulated in asthma. Taking advantage of open-access gene expression datasets of sputum cells or BAL cells from asthma patients, we analyzed a microarray dataset (GSE76262) using sputum cells from mild-moderate asthma (n=25) and severe asthma (n=49), and found that the expression levels of CDH26 were significantly higher in the sputum cells from patients with severe asthma compared to mild-moderate asthma (28). This suggests that CDH26 expression is even higher in severe asthma. Moreover, there is a positive correlation between the expression levels of CDH26 and CCL17 in asthma patients (Figures E1F-1G). We further analyzed an RNA-seq dataset (GSE2125) using alveolar macrophages isolated from control subjects and asthma patients, and found that the expression levels of CDH26 were significantly higher in macrophages from asthma patients (n=15) compared to control subjects (n=15) (Figure 1J) (29). This supports our findings that CDH26 is upregulated in lung macrophages in asthma. Together, our data suggest that CDH26 expression is upregulated in lung macrophages of eosinophilic asthma or severe asthma.
2. Macrophage-specific Cdh26 deficiency alleviates airway eosinophilia and mucus overproduction in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation
We next examined the expression of Cdh26 in BAL cells from wild type (WT) mice and observed enlarged, foamy Cdh26+Cd68+ cells in in ovalbumin (OVA)-sensitized and challenged WT mice (Figures 2A). The fluorescent intensity of Cdh26 relative to Cd68 were increased in OVA challenged WT mice (Figures 2B). We observed that global Cdh26 deficiency significantly inhibited airway eosinophilia and the expression of molecular makers for macrophage alternative activation in the mouse model (Figures E2-E3). We further utilized macrophage-specific Cdh26-deficient mice generated by crossing Lyz2Cre mice and Cdh26fl/fl mice (Figures E4A-E4C, 2C). H&E staining and morphological inflammatory scoring revealed that OVA-induced peribronchial inflammation was alleviated in Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice compared to Cdh26fl/fl mice (Figures 2D-2E). OVA challenge increased the number of eosinophils in BAL of Cdh26fl/fl mice, but this increase was significantly reduced in Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice (Figure 2G). The number of PAS-staining-positive mucous cells and the airway resistance to methacholine were increased in OVA-challenged compared to saline-challenged Cdh26fl/flmice. However, the mucous cell metaplasia and airway hyperresponsiveness were significantly attenuated in Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice compared to Cdh26fl/fl mice (Figures 2D, 2F, 2H). In addition, Masson trichrome staining revealed that collagen area was significantly reduced in Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice (Figures E5A-E5B). Our findings suggest that macrophage Cdh26 is required for eosinophilic airway inflammation, mucus overproduction, and airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma.
A-B) Representative images for co-immunofluorescence staining of Cdh26 (green) and Cd68 (red) in BAL cells from mouse (scale bar = 50 μm). Quantification of relative immunofluorescence intensity of Cdh26 to Cd68 (n=4). C) Mouse experimental schedule. D) Representative images of H&E and PAS staining in mouse lung sections (scale bar = 100 μm). E) The inflammatory score was graded in four random fields for each lung section at 200× magnification. F) The numbers of PAS-staining-positive cells were counted in four random fields for each lung section at 200× magnification. G) Cell counts for macrophages, eosinophils, lymphocytes and neutrophils in BALF. H) Pulmonary resistance in response to different concentrations of intravenous methacholine in mice. n=8-10 mice per group. Data are mean ±SD. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Abbreviations: Cdh26, cadherin-26; Cd68, Cd68 molecule; WT, wild type; OVA, ovalbumin; H&E staining, hematoxylin-eosin staining; PAS staining, periodic acid-Schiff; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage.
3. Cdh26 is required for macrophage alternative activation
We further evaluated the effect of macrophage-specific Cdh26 deficiency on macrophage alternative activation. Immunofluorescence staining for Cd68 and Cd206, a marker for M2 macrophage, were performed using BAL cells from mice. The number of Cd68+Cd206+ BAL cells was increased in OVA-challenged Cdh26fl/fl mice, while this increase was suppressed in Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice (Figures 3A-3B). We also used flow cytometry to evaluate macrophage alternative activation in lung tissue. Defining Cd45+Cd11b+Cd206+ cells as M2 macrophages (Figure E4D), we observed a significant reduction in the number of Cd45+Cd11b+Cd206+ cells in lung tissue of OVA-challenged Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice compared to Cdh26fl/flmice (Figures 3C-3D). Consistently, western blotting showed reduced expression of M2 markers Arg1 and Cd206 in lung tissue of OVA-challenged Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice (Figures 3E-3G). The transcript levels of Cd206 and Ym1 were also decreased in lung tissue of Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice (Figures 3H-3K). M2 macrophages can recruit Th2 cells and promote eosinophilic airway inflammation by secreting CCL17 and CCL22 (30). We found a reduction in transcript and protein levels of Ccl17 and Ccl22 in lung tissue and BALF from OVA-challenged Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice, respectively (Figures 3L-3O).
A) Representative images for immunofluorescence staining of Cd206 (green) and Cd68 (red) in BAL cells from mouse (scale bar = 50 μm). Nuclei was stained with DAPI (blue). B) The numbers of Cd68+/Cd206+ cells were counted in the cytospin of BAL cells in 5 fields for each mouse and the average number were calculated (n = 6 mice) using ImageJ. C) Flow cytometry for M2 macrophages using single cell suspensions from mouse lung tissue. Cd45+Cd11b+ cells were identified as macrophages, and Cd45+Cd11b+Cd206+ cells were identified as M2 macrophages. Representative dot plots showing the percentages of M2 macrophages in different groups. D) The percentages of M2 macrophages of total macrophages in different groups. E-G) The protein levels of Arg1, Cd206 in mouse lungs (n=6) were determined by western blotting and representative image was shown. Densitometry assay was performed using ImageJ, and Arg1, Cd206 protein levels were indexed to Actb. H-M) The mRNA levels of Cd206, Ym1, Arg1, Ccl24, Ccl17 and Ccl22 in mouse lungs were determined using quantitative PCR. The transcript levels were expressed as log2 transformed and relative to the mean value of control group. N-Q) The protein levels of Ccl17, Ccl22 in the supernatant of BAL fluid were determined using ELISA. n=8-10 mice per group. Data are mean ± SD. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Abbreviations: Cd68, Cd68 molecule; Cd206, mannose receptor C-type 1; Arg1, arginase-1; Ym1, also named as Chil3, chitinase-like protein 3; Ccl17, C-C motif chemokine ligand 17; Ccl22, C-C motif chemokine ligand 22; Ccl24, C-C motif chemokine ligand 24; Actb, actin beta.
In vitro, we stimulated mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) and lung macrophages from WT mice with LPS and IL-4, respectively. The transcription levels of Cdh26 were increased after IL-4 stimulation, but not altered after LPS stimulation (Figures E6A-E6F). Moreover, we stimulated WT BMDMs with IL-4 or IL-13 and found that only IL-4 enhanced the expression of Cdh26 (Figures E6G-E4I). The expression of M2 markers in IL-4-stimulated BMDM derived from Cdh26−/− mice were significantly suppressed compared to IL-4-stimulated BMDMs from control mice (Figures E7). Similar results were observed in cultured mouse lung macrophages (Figures E8). Our data suggest that Cdh26 is required for macrophage alternative activation.
4. Cdh26 deficiency suppresses IL-4R expression and IL-4R-STAT6 signaling in macrophages
Type I IL-4R consisting of IL-4Rα and IL-2Rγ (γc) subunits plays a central role in macrophage alternative activation (15). We examined the expression of CDH26 and IL-4Rα in BAL cells using immunofluorescence staining, and found that both CDH26 and IL-4Rα were localized in some CD206+ macrophages (Figure 4A), and the number of CDH26+IL-4Rα+CD206+ cells were markedly increased in asthma patients (n=4) compared to control subjects (n=4) (Figure 4B). This suggests that CDH26 and IL-4Rα are co-expressed in alternatively activated macrophages in human asthma. Moreover, the transcription levels of IL4RA were increased in sputum cells of our mild-moderate asthma patients compared to control subjects (Figure 4C). Of note, analysis of the aforementioned dataset (GES76262) revealed that the expression levels of IL4RA in sputum cells were significantly higher in severe asthma compared to mild-moderate asthma (Figure 4D). These data suggest that IL-4Rα is upregulated in alternatively activated macrophages in asthma.
A) Representative images of immunostaining of CDH26 (red), IL-4Rα (green) and CD206 (yellow) in BAL cells from asthma patients (n=4) and control subjects (n=4). Nuclei was stained with DAPI (blue). B) The numbers of CDH26+/IL-4Rα +/CD206+ cells were counted in the cytospin of BAL cells in 5 fields for each subject and the average number were calculated using ImageJ (n = 4 per group). C) IL4RA transcript levels in induced sputum cells from asthma patients (n=32) and control subjects (n=14) were determined by quantitative PCR. The transcript levels were expressed as log2 transformed and relative to the mean value for control subjects. D) The expression levels of IL4RA in a microarray data (GSE76262) using sputum cells from subjects with mild-moderate (n=25) and severe asthma (n=49) were analyzed. E-F) The protein levels of Il-4Rα in BMDM cells exposed to Il-4 for 48h were determined by western blotting. Densitometry assay was performed using ImageJ, and Il-4Rα protein levels were indexed to Gapdh. G) The transcript levels of Il4ra in Il-4 stimulated BMDMs derived from WT or Cdh26−/− mice were determined by quantitative PCR. The transcript levels were expressed as log2 transformed and relative to the mean value for control group. H-I) The protein levels of p-STAT6 in WT or Cdh26−/− mice derived-BMDM cells stimulated with or without Il-4 for 6h were determined by western blotting. Densitometry assay was performed using ImageJ, and p-STAT6 protein levels were indexed to total STAT6. J) Representative images for immunofluorescence staining of Il-4Rα (green) and Cd206 (red) in BAL cells from Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre and Cdh26fl/fl mice challenged with saline or OVA. Nuclei was stained with DAPI (blue). K-L) The numbers of Il-4Rα+Cd206+ cells (K), Il-4Rα+ (L) were counted in the cytospin of BAL cells in 5 fields for each mouse and the average number were calculated for Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre and Cdh26fl/fl mice challenged with saline or OVA using ImageJ (n = 4 mice per group). M) Representative images for immunofluorescence staining of Il-4Rα (green) and Cd206 (red) in saline- or Il-4-stimulated BMDMs derived from Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre and Cdh26fl/fl mice. Nuclei was stained with DAPI (blue). N-O) The numbers of Il-4Rα+Cd206+(N), Il-4Rα+(O) cells were counted in saline- or Il-4-stimulated BMDMs derived from Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre and Cdh26fl/fl mice using ImageJ (n=4 wells per group). Data are mean ± SD. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Abbreviations: CDH26, cadherin-26; CD206, mannose receptor C-Type 1; IL-4Rα, interleukin-4 receptor subunit alpha; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; BMDM, bone marrow derived macrophage; STAT6, signal transducer and activator of transcription 6; Gapdh, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
We next examined the transcript and protein levels of Il-4Rα in BMDMs from WT and Cdh26−/− mice. Cdh26 deficiency suppressed the protein level of Il-4Rα whereas did not alter its transcription level, suggesting that Cdh26 may regulate Il-4Rα expression post-translationally (Figures 4E-4G). We further assessed the phosphorylation of STAT6 using western blotting and observed that Cdh26 deficiency significantly inhibited Il-4-induced STAT6 phosphorylation in BMDMs (Figures 4H-4I). To further investigate the impact of Cdh26 deficiency on Il-4Rα expression in M2 macrophages, we performed co-immunofluorescence staining of Il-4Rα and Cd206 in BAL cells from saline or OVA-challenged Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre and Cdh26fl/fl mice. OVA challenge increased the number of Il-4Rα+ and Il-4Rα+Cd206+ cells in BAL cells from Cdh26fl/fl mice, while the number of Il-4Rα+ and Il-4Rα+Cd206+ cells were decreased in OVA-challenged Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice (Figures 4J-4L). Similar results were observed in saline or Il-4-stimulated BMDMs derived from Cdh26fl/fland Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice (Figures 4M-4O). Our data suggest that Cdh26 deficiency suppresses IL-4Rα expression and the IL-4R-STAT6 signaling pathway in macrophages.
5. CDH26 enhances IL-4Rα expression via inhibiting its ubiquitination and degradation
We next used cycloheximide, an inhibitor of protein synthesis, to treat A549 cells which constitutively express IL-4Rα, and assessed the impact of CDH26 knockdown or overexpression on the degradation rate of IL-4Rα and IL-2Rγ. CDH26 knockdown significantly accelerated the degradation rate of IL-4Rα whereas did not alter the degradation rate of IL-2Rγ (Figures 5A-5C). Conversely, CDH26 overexpression significantly suppressed the degradation rate of IL-4Rα whereas did not alter the degradation rate of IL-2Rγ (Figures 5D-5F). This indicates that CDH26 suppresses IL-4Rα degradation.
A-C) IL-4Rα and IL-2Rγ protein levels were measured in A549 cells transfected with control or CDH26 siRNA and treated with CHX for 0, 6, 12, 24h using western blotting. Densitometry assay was performed using ImageJ, and IL-4Rα and IL-2Rγ protein levels were indexed to GAPDH. D-F) IL-4Rα and IL-2Rγ protein levels were measured in A549 cells transfected with empty or CDH26 overexpressing vector and treated with CHX for 0, 6, 12, 24h using western blotting. Densitometry assay was performed using ImageJ, and IL-4Rα and IL-2Rγ protein levels were indexed to GAPDH. The experiment was repeated 3 times independently. G-H) IL-4Rα protein level was determined in A549 cells transfected with control or CDH26 siRNA and treated with MG132 using western blotting. Densitometry assay was performed using ImageJ, and IL-4Rα protein levels were indexed to GAPDH. I-J) IL-4Rα protein level was determined in A549 cells transfected with control or CDH26 siRNA and treated with CQ using western blotting. Densitometry assay was performed using ImageJ, and IL-4Rα protein level was indexed to GAPDH. K) HEK-293T cells were transfected with plasmids expressing IL-4RαGFP and CDH26FLAG as indicated, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP antibody followed by western blotting. The ubiquitination level of IL-4Rα was assessed using ubiquitin antibodies. All experiments were repeated for at least three times independently. Data are mean ± SD. *p<0.05. Abbreviations: CDH26, cadherin-26; IL-4Rα, interleukin-4 receptor subunit alpha; IL-2Rγ, interleukin-2 receptor subunit gamma; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; CHX, cycloheximide; MG132, Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-al; CQ, chloroquine.
Protein degradation pathways mainly include the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and the lysosome pathway. To investigate the specific mechanism by which CDH26 suppresses IL-4Rα degradation, we used the proteasome pathway inhibitor MG132 and the lysosome pathway inhibitor chloroquine (CQ) to treat A549 cells transfected with CDH26 siRNA. We found that CDH26 knockdown decreased IL-4Rα protein level while MG132 restored the protein level of IL-4Rα. However, chloroquine did not affect IL-4Rα protein expression (Figures 5G-5J). These results suggest that CDH26 may inhibit IL-4Rα degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. In support of this, we found that CDH26 overexpression significantly inhibited the ubiquitination level of IL-4Rα (Figures 5K). Together, our findings suggest that CDH26 enhances IL-4Rα expression via inhibiting its ubiquitination and degradation.
6. CDH26 interacts with STUB1 to restrain the binding of STUB1 with IL-4Rα
To further explored the mechanism by which CDH26 inhibits IL-4Rα ubiquitination-proteasomal degradation, we transfected HEK-293T cells with CDH26-FLAG overexpression plasmid. Co-immunoprecipitation experiment using FLAG antibody and mass spectrometry analysis were performed to identify the proteins interacting with CDH26 (Figures 6A, E9A-E9B). A total of 423 proteins interacting with CDH26 were identified and they were intersected with the molecules involved in “Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis” pathway in KEGG database, resulting in the identification of four molecules: UBE3C, STUB1, CDC20, and UBE2G2 (Figures 6B-6C). A previous study demonstrated that STUB1 acts as an E3 ubiquitin ligase responsible for IL-4Rα ubiquitination and subsequent degradation (17).We found no significant difference in STUB1 transcripts in airway brushing between asthma patients and control subjects, but STUB1 transcripts were slightly decreased in BAL cells from asthma patients compared to control subjects (Figures 6D-6E). In addition, there was no difference in STUB1 transcript and protein levels in lung tissues between OVA-challenged Cdh26fl/fl and Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice (Figures 6F-6H).
A) HEK-293T cells were transfected with plasmids expressing CDH26FLAG, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody followed by mass spectrum. B) Volcanic map of the proteins interacting with CDH26 detected by mass spectrum. C) Veen diagram shown the protein molecules identified by intersecting the proteins interacting with CDH26 and the proteins involved in ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. D) STUB1 transcript levels in bronchial brushings from asthma patients (n=24) and control subjects (n=10) were determined using quantitative PCR. E) STUB1 transcript levels in BAL cells from asthma patients (n=32) and control subjects (n=17) were determined using quantitative PCR. F) The transcript levels of Stub1 in lungs of Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre or Cdh26fl/flmice challenged with saline or OVA were determined using quantitative PCR (n = 8-10 mice per group). The transcript levels were expressed as log2 transformed and relative to the mean value of control group. G-H) The protein levels of Stub1 in lungs of Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre or Cdh26fl/fl mice challenged with saline or OVA were determined using western blotting (n = 3 per group). Densitometry assay was performed using ImageJ, and Stub1 protein levels were indexed to Actb. I) Binding of CDH26 with STUB1 was examined using immunoprecipitation assay. J) Binding of IL-4Rα with STUB1 was examined using immunoprecipitation assay. K-L) A549 cells were treated with CDH26 siRNA and/or STUB1 siRNA, and IL-4Rα protein levels were determined using western blotting. Densitometry assay was performed using ImageJ, and IL-4Rα protein level was indexed to GAPDH. The experiment was repeated 3 times independently. M) HEK-293T cells were transfected with plasmids expressing IL-4RαGFP and CDH26FLAG as indicated, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP or IgG antibody followed by western blotting. The ubiquitination level of IL-4Rα was assessed using ubiquitin antibodies. N) The binding interface between CDH26 (716-724, 787-794, and 802-817) and STUB1 was predicted based on the molecular docking model using zdock. O) HEK-293T cells were transfected with plasmids expressing full-CDH26 (1–832) and del-CDH26FLAG (deleting amino acids 716-724, 787-794, and 802-817), and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG or IgG antibody followed by western blotting. P) HEK-293T cells were transfected with plasmids expressing IL-4RαGFP, full-CDH26 and del-CDH26FLAG, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP or IgG antibody followed by western blotting. Data are mean ± SD. *p<0.05. Abbreviations: CDH26, cadherin-26; STUB1, STIP1 homology and U-box containing protein 1; ACTB, actin beta; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; IL-4Rα, interleukin-4 receptor subunit alpha.
We further confirmed the interaction between CDH26 and STUB1 using protein immunoprecipitation experiments. Coimmunoprecipitation assay using STUB1 antibody to capture protein complexes in HEK-293T lysates showed that CDH26 coprecipitated with STUB1 (Figure 6I). In reciprocal experiments, overexpression of FLAG-tagged CDH26 (CDH26FLAG) in HEK-293T cells resulted in the coprecipitation of STUB1 with the antibody against FLAG (Figure 6J). To explore the impact of the CDH26-STUB1 interaction on the ubiquitination of IL-4Rα, we transfected HEK-293T cells with a plasmid overexpressing CDH26 and observed a significant inhibition of STUB1 levels binds to IL-4Rα, as well as a decrease in the ubiquitination level of IL-4Rα (Figure 6M). This suggests that CDH26 may competitively bind to STUB1, inhibiting the binding of STUB1 with IL-4Rα and its subsequent ubiquitination. In support of this, CDH26 knockdown significantly inhibited the elevation of IL-4Rα protein level induced by STUB1 knockdown (Figures 6K-6L).
Next, we attempted to determine the potential binding sites of CDH26 required for its interaction with STUB1. Using the predicted structures of CDH26 (uniProt ID: Q8IXH8) and STUB1 (uniProt ID: Q9UNE7) from the AlphaFold protein structure database (https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/), we performed protein-protein docking experiments. Since CDH26 is a transmembrane protein, we extracted the intracellular sequence of CDH26 (636–832) for the docking experiments (http://zdock.umassmed.edu/). We selected the top-scoring docking conformation and identified the binding sites using PDBePISA (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/msd-srv/prot_int/cgi-bin/piserver). The results indicated that amino acids 716-724, 787-794, and 802-817 of CDH26 are potential binding sites for STUB1 (Figure 6N). Therefore, we designed CDH26 mutants by deleting the segments 716-724, 787-794, and 802-817. Protein immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that deletion of these segments significantly weakened the binding of CDH26 to STUB1, while the binding of STUB1 to IL-4Rα was significantly enhanced (Figures 6O-6P). Our results suggest that the segments 716-724, 787-794, and 802-817 of CDH26 may be involved in its interaction with STUB1 and competitively inhibit the binding of STUB1 to IL-4Rα. Together, our data suggest that CDH26 interacts with STUB1 to restrain the binding of STUB1 with IL-4Rα and its subsequent ubiquitination and degradation.
7. Cdh26 siRNA encapsulated lipid nanoparticles effectively alleviates airway eosinophilia and mucus overproduction in the mouse model
Finally, we sought to translate our findings into a therapeutic approach for asthma. We screened for efficient Cdh26 siRNAs in 3T3 cells and encapsulated Cdh26 siRNA-2 in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) (Figure 7A). The encapsulation efficiency of Cdh26 siRNA@LNPs was greater than 95%, with a zeta potential of −0.74mV (Table E2). We detected the cellular localization of DiR-labeled LNPs in BAL cells and lung tissue using immunofluorescence, and found that DiR-labeled LNPs were both uptaken by Cd68+ macrophages and Ccsp+ airway epithelial cells (Figures 7B-7C). To demonstrate the biodistribution of Cdh26 siRNA@LNPs, we administered them intratracheally and used the In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS) to track the fluorescent signal of lipophilic carbocyanine DiOC18 (DiR)-labeled LNPs. We found that LNPs could accumulate in the lung tissue for at least 3 days (Figure 7D).
A) Cdh26 transcripts in 3T3 cells transfected with three Cdh26 siRNA were measured by quantitative PCR. The transcript levels were expressed as log2 transformed and relative to the mean value for control group. B) Representative images for immunofluorescence staining of DiR (red) and Cd68 (green) in mouse BAL cells. C) Representative images for immunofluorescence staining of DiR (red) and Ccsp (green) in mouse lung sections. D) Representative IVIS images of the mouse administrated with DiR-labeled Cdh26 siRNA@LNPs. E) Mouse experimental schedule. F) Cell counts for macrophages, eosinophils, lymphocytes and neutrophils in BALF. G) Representative images of immunofluorescence staining of Cdh26 (green) and Cd68 (green) in BAL cells, H&E staining, and PAS staining in mouse lung sections. H) The inflammatory score was graded in four random fields for each lung section at 200× magnification. I) The numbers of PAS-staining-positive cells were counted in four random fields for each lung section at 200× magnification. J-K) The protein levels of Arg1 in mouse lungs were determined by western blotting, and Arg protein levels were indexed to Actb. L-O) The transctipt levels of Cd206, Arg1, Ym1, Ccl17 and Ccl24 in mouse lungs were determined using quantitative PCR. The transcript levels were expressed as log2 transformed and relative to the mean value for control group. n=8-10 mice per group. Data are mean ±SD. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Abbreviations: CDH26, cadherin-26; BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; LNPs, lipid nanoparticles; DiR, DiOC18; Cd68, Cd68 molecule; Ccsp, club cells 10 kDa secretory protein; Arg1, arginase-1; Ym1, also named as Chil3, chitinase-like protein 3; Ccl24, C-C motif chemokine ligand 24; Ccl17, C-C motif chemokine ligand 17.
CDH26, through interacting with STUB1 and trapping it, inhibits IL-4Rα ubiquitination-proteasomal degradation, leading to sustained activation of the IL-4R-STAT6 signaling, macrophage alternative activation, and type 2 inflammation in asthma. Lipid nanoparticles encapsulating Cdh26 siRNA can effectively alleviate OVA-induced macrophage M2 polarization and airway inflammation in mice.
We next intratracheally administered Cdh26 siRNA@LNPs to mice sensitized and challenged with OVA (Figure 7E). H&E staining of liver, spleen, and kidney showed no significant damage following the administration of Cdh26 siRNA@LNPs (Figure E10). Immunofluorescence staining of Cdh26 and Cd68 in BAL cells revealed a significant decrease of Cdh26 expression in Cd68+ cells after Cdh26 siRNA@LNPs treatment (Figure 7H). Cdh26 siRNA@LNPs treatment significantly decreased the number of eosinophils in BAL cells from OVA-challenged mice (Figure 7F). H&E and PAS staining revealed that Cdh26 siRNA@LNPs treatment significantly decreased inflammation scores and the number of PAS staining-positive cells (Figures 7G-7I), suggesting that Cdh26 siRNA@LNPs effectively inhibit airway eosinophilic inflammation and mucus overproduction in the mouse model. In addition, Cdh26 siRNA@LNPs treatment significantly inhibited the transcript levels of Arg1, Ym1, Ccl17, and Ccl24, as well as the protein level of Arg1 (Figures 7J-7O). Our data suggest that Cdh26 siRNA encapsulated lipid nanoparticles effectively alleviate airway eosinophilia and mucus overproduction in the mouse model.
Discussion
IL-4R signaling drives mucous cell metaplasia, macrophage alternative activation, Th2 cell differentiation, and type 2 inflammation in allergic diseases (31–36). However, the mechanism underlying the regulation of IL-4R expression remains unclear. Our study uncovers a novel mechanism that CDH26 directly interacts with STUB1 and suppresses the STUB1-mediated ubiquitination-proteasomal degradation of IL-4Rα, a subunit shared by type I and type II IL-R, thus hampering the termination of IL-4R signaling and resulting in sustained activation of IL-4R signaling in asthma.
As a member of the cadherin family, CDH26 is highly expressed in allergic airway and gastrointestinal epithelium (24, 25). For the first time, we showed that CDH26 was upregulated in activated macrophages from eosinophilic asthma patients. Of note, CDH26 expression in sputum cells is higher in severe asthma compared to mild-moderate asthma as shown in Figure 1G, suggesting CDH26 may contribute to the development of severe asthma. Several studies suggest a link between elevated number of M2 macrophages and asthma severity(37, 38). M2 macrophages can release chemokines such as CCL17 and CCL22 to recruit Th2 cells and amplify the Th2 cell response in asthma(39). Our in vivo and in vitro data demonstrated that macrophage-specific Cdh26 deficiency suppresses airway eosinophilia, macrophage alternative activation and their secretion of CCL17 and CCL22, suggesting that CDH26-mediated macrophage alternative activation is essential in asthma pathogenesis.
CDH26 expression is upregulated in IL-13-stimulated epithelial cells(25). Here, we showed that IL-4 markedly increased CDH26 expression in mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages, while a selective JAK1 inhibitor suppressed CDH26 expression (Figures E11). This suggests that type 2 immune microenvironment may be responsible for CDH26 upregulation in macrophages. Interestingly, changes in DNA methylation can induce gene transcription and three hypomethylated sites were found in the CDH26 locus of asthma patients(40), suggesting epigenetic factor may also contribute to CDH26 upregulation in asthma patients.
The type 2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-13 activate IL-4R signaling in airway epithelial cells, macrophages, and lymphocytes, leading to mucous cell metaplasia, macrophages alternative activation, Th2 cell differentiation, and eosinophilic airway inflammation (12). We recently reported that CDH26 promotes mucus overproduction and the secretion of CCL11, CCL24, and CCL26 by airway epithelial cells via amplifying the type II IL-4R signaling (25). Airway epithelial cells mainly express type Ⅱ IL-4R consisted of IL-4Rα and IL-13Rα1, while macrophages express type Ⅰ IL4R composed of IL-4Rα and IL-2Rγ (14). Here, we showed that CDH26 suppresses the degradation of IL-4Rα but not IL-2Rγ. Taken together, CDH26 upregulates the IL-4R signaling by inhibiting the protein degradation of IL-4Rα, a subunit shared by type I and type II IL-4R.
So far, the mechanisms underlying the regulation of IL-4R expression include endocytosis, ubiquitination-proteasome degradation, and co-receptor(16–18, 41). Our results suggest that CDH26 regulates the degradation of IL-4Rα through ubiquitination-proteasome pathway, rather than endocytosis-lysosomal pathway. Ubiquitin-proteasome system is the main cellular protein degradation system(42). Ubiquitin molecules interact with protein substrates through the action of E1 ubiquitin-activating enzymes, E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, and E3 ubiquitin ligases. Wei and colleagues demonstrated the interaction between STUB1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, and IL-4Rα promotes the ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation of IL-4Rα. Stub1-deficient mice exhibit spontaneous airway inflammation and macrophages alternative activation (17). In the present study, we demonstrated that CDH26 directly interacts with STUB1 and suppresses the binding of STUB1 to IL-4Rα, thereby restrains STUB1-mediated IL-4Rα ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. This novel mechanism can explain our observation that Cdh26 deficiency suppressed IL-4-induced macrophages alternative activation and our recent reports that CDH26 knockdown inhibited IL-13-induced mucus production and chemokine expression by epithelial cells.
Besides IL-4Rα, STUB1 is involved in the ubiquitination-proteasomal degradation of multiple protein molecules including EGFR and PKM2(43, 44). We observed that CDH26 can inhibit the degradation of EGFR (unpublished data), and EGFR pathway plays an important role in airway remodeling in asthma (45). Taken our findings together, the highly expressed CDH26 in airway epithelium and macrophages of asthma patients is a promising therapeutic target. In addition, the observation that CDH26 expression is even higher in severe asthma compared to mild-moderate asthma suggests targeting CDH26 may be beneficial for patients with severe asthma.
Lipid nanoparticles have been widely utilized for the delivery of mRNA vaccines (46). Recent studies on lipid nanoparticles have shown that modified lipid nanoparticles can effectively penetrate the mucus-cilia barrier maintaining high stability in nebulized form (47). Our LNPs encapsulating Cdh26 siRNA effectively suppressed OVA-induced eosinophilic airway inflammation and macrophage alternative activation in mice. LNPs encapsulating CDH26 siRNA may represent a new method for treating eosinophilic asthma.
Our study has several limitations. First, our asthma patients are mild-moderate asthma, CDH26 expression and localization in severe asthma needs to be further investigated. Second, we cannot exclude the possibility that CDH26 may interact with other E3 ubiquitin ligase besides STUB1 as shown in Figure 6C to prevent IL-4Rα degradation. Third, although we identified the putative binding domain between CDH26 and STUB1, the specific binding site needs to be identified. Finally, the efficacy and safety of LNPs encapsulating Cdh26 siRNA and its aerosolized form in asthma requires further study.
In summary, we demonstrated that CDH26 directly interacts with STUB1 and restrains the binding of STUB1 to IL-4Rα, thereby suppressing IL-4Rα ubiquitination-proteasomal degradation, leading to sustained activation of IL-4R signaling, alternative activation of macrophage, and airway inflammation in asthma. Lipid nanoparticles encapsulating Cdh26 siRNA can effectively alleviate macrophage activation and airway eosinophilia in mice.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
Supplementary Materials and Methods, Figures and Tables
Extensive Materials and Methods Section
Subjects
We recruited 17 control subjects, 25 eosinophilic asthma patients (sputum eosinophils > 3%), and 7 non-eosinophilic asthma patients (sputum eosinophil ≤ 3%) (1). All participants were Chinese and recruited from Tongji Hospital. None of the participants had a history of smoking or received inhaled or oral corticosteroids or leukotriene antagonists. For each participant, we collected demographic information and induced sputum samples. We also measured spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and serum IgE levels. All asthma patients had a history of episodic wheezing and met the criteria for bronchial hyperresponsiveness, with a methacholine PD20 of less than 2.505 mg or a 12% or greater increase in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) after the inhalation of 200 µg of salbutamol. All participants also underwent bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) collection. The control subjects had no history of chest tightness or wheezing, and lung function stimulation tests were negative. All participants provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by the ethics committee of Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
Murine model of allergic airway inflammation
Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice on a C57BL/6N background were constructed from the GemPharmatech (Nanjing, China). Exon 4 of Cdh26 gene was knocked out in Cdh26fl/flLyz2Cre mice. All experimental mice were sensitized three times on days 0, 7, and 14 by intraperitoneal injection of sensitizing agents (OVA + aluminum hydroxide mixture) at a volume of 200 μl (containing 100 μg OVA). From days 21 to 23, each mouse was intranasally stimulated with 50 μl of OVA solution (containing 1 mg OVA) daily (2). Pulmonary resistance in response to various intravenous methacholine concentrations was measured using the forced oscillation technique with the FlexiVent system (SCIREQ) 24 hours after the final challenge. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected and cell counts for macrophages, eosinophils, lymphocytes, and neutrophils were determined as previously described (3). Lung tissues were collected for histological analysis, quantitative PCR, western blotting, flow cytometry, and immunostaining. All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
Cell culture and treatment
BMDM (bone marrow-derived macrophages) cells and mouse pulmonary macrophages were isolated from both WT (wild-type) and Cdh26−/− mice. They were then treated with IL-4 for 48 hours. HEK-293T and A549 cells were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS (Biological Industries, Israel). These cells were transfected with either scrambled control or CDH26 siRNA (80 nM; GeneCopoeia) or empty or CDH26 cDNA expression vector (500 ng/mL) using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, CA).
Quantitative PCR
Total RNA was isolated from induced sputum cells, BAL cells, mouse lungs, mouse pulmonary macrophages and BMDM cells using TRIzol (Takara, Tokyo, Japan). The isolated RNA was then reverse transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara, Tokyo, Japan). The primer sequences for gene amplification were obtained from the primer bank and can be found in Table S1. The expression levels of these genes were determined using the 2−ΔΔCT method. The gene expression values were expressed as log2 transformed and relative to the median expression level of the control group.
Western blotting
The protein sample preparation involved several steps. Firstly, the cells were lysed using ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer (Servicebio, Wuhan, China) supplemented with EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Tablets. The lysates were then subjected to SDS-PAGE, either 8% or non-reducing, for protein separation. The proteins were subsequently transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) by electrophoresis. Next, the PVDF membranes were blocked using a solution containing Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 and nonfat milk. The membranes were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with specific antibodies at a dilution of 1:1000 in 5% milk. Antibodies used in western blotting were: anti-CDH26 mAb (Sigma-Aldrich, 1:1000 dilution), mouse anti-Il-4Rα mAb (R&D system, 1:1000 dilution), human anti-IL-4Rα mAb (Abcam, 1:1000 dilution), anti-IL-2Rγ mAb (Abclonal, 1:1000 dilution), anti-total and phosphorylated Stat6 pAb (Cell Signaling, 1:1,000 dilution), anti-STUB1 mAb (Abcam, 1:1000 dilution), mouse anti-Cd206 mAb (R&D system, 1:1000 dilution) and anti-ARG1 mAb (Proteintech, 1:1000 dilution), anti-FLAG mAb (Proteintech, 1:2000 dilution), anti-GFP mAb (Proteintech, 1:2000 dilution), anti-ubiquitin pAb (Proteintech, 1:1000 dilution), anti-anti-GAPDH pAb (Proteintech, 1:4000 dilution) and anti-anti-ACTB pAb (Proteintech, 1:4000 dilution). After the overnight incubation, the membranes were treated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature. Finally, the protein signals were detected using an ECL kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Histology staining
The left lungs of mice were fixed by inflation and embedded in paraffin. 5-μm sections were then cut from the embedded tissues. These sections were subjected to H&E staining, PAS staining, and Masson staining. For H&E staining, lung sections were treated with hematoxylin and eosin staining kit (Servicebio, Wuhan, China) to evaluate peri-bronchial inflammation. The severity of inflammation surrounding airways with a luminal diameter of 170 ± 40 μm in H&E-stained lung sections was assessed using the following scoring system: 0 for normal; 1 for few cells; 2 for a single layer of inflammatory cells; 3 for 2-4 layers of inflammatory cells; and 4 for more than 4 layers of inflammatory cells. For PAS staining, lung sections were stained using a periodic acid-Schiff staining kit (Servicebio, Wuhan, China) to detect mucus. The number of PAS-positive cells in airways with a luminal diameter of 170 ± 40 μm was counted in five randomly selected fields per lung section at 200× magnification.
Immunofluorescence
The immunofluorescence method of frozen slides was as follows: After the slides were restored to room temperature, they were washed 3 times with PBS for 5 min each time. The immunostaining permeabilization buffer was added and incubated at room temperature for 20 min. Add goat serum blocking buffer and block for 30 minutes. Subsequently, the slices were incubated with primary antibodies in a wet box overnight at 4°C. Antibodies used in immunofluorescence were: anti-CDH26 mAb (Sigma-Aldrich, 1:100 dilution), mouse anti-Il-4Rα mAb (R&D system, 1:200 dilution), human anti-IL-4Rα mAb (R&D 1:200 dilution), anti-CD206 mAb (Proteintech, 1:2000 dilution) and anti-CD68 mAb (Proteintech, 1:2000 dilution). Antibody wash buffer was added to remove the primary antibody, and then the Cy3 or FITC conjugated secondary antibodies (donkey-anti mouse or rabbit IgG, Abbkine) were added and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. After PBS cleaning, DAPI staining is used. Washing again, the slices were sealed with anti-fluorescence quenching sealing agent. Then, slices were observed under fluorescence microscope within one week to avoid fluorescence quenching, and images were collected.
Flow cytometry
Following euthanasia, the lung samples of mice were dissected in HBSS buffer. Single-cell suspensions were prepared by filtering the samples through a 100 μm nylon filter strainer and washing them in HBSS buffer supplemented with 2% FBS, 20 mM HEPES, and 5 mM EDTA. The cells were then resuspended at a concentration of 1*10^6 cells/100 µL. Subsequently, 100 µL of the cell suspension was added to a flow tube, and 2 µL of FcBlock was added to each tube, followed by incubation on ice for 10 min. Three types of tubes were set up: a blank tube, a single staining tube, and a sample tube. In the single staining tube, a single antibody was added. In the sample tube, 0.5 µL of LIVE/DEAD™ Fixable Yellow Dead Cell Stain Kit (Invitrogen, USA), 2 µL of anti-Cd45 (bv510), and 1.25 µL of anti-Cd11b (FITC) antibodies (Biolegend, USA) were added, followed by incubation on ice for 15-20 min while protected from light. After permeabilization with intracellular Staining Permeabilization Wash Buffer Biolegend, USA), 1.5 µL of anti-Cd206 (PE) antibody was added and incubated for 20 min. Finally, the cells were suspended in PBS and analyzed promptly.
ELISA
Ccl17 and Ccl22, in BALF were analyzed by ELISA (BOSTER Biological Technology, China). ELISA was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All samples and standards were measured in duplicate.
Immunoprecipitation
NHK 293T cell proteins were extracted using RIPA lysis buffer (Sigma-Aldrich). An appropriate dilution of either anti-FLAG mAb (Proteintech, 1:550 dilution) or anti-GFP mAb (Proteintech, 1:50 dilution) was added to a centrifuge tube coated with Protein G. The antibody-bead mixture was incubated at 4°C for 4 hours using a tube rotator. Then, 50 μg of cell lysates were added to the mixture, and the lysate-bead/antibody conjugate mixtures were incubated overnight at 4°C. The mixtures were subsequently resuspended in 5×SDS loading buffer, boiled for 5 minutes, and analyzed by Western blotting.
Mass spectrometry analysis
We transfected HEK-293T cells with CDH26-FLAG overexpression plasmid. The samples were obtained through co-immunoprecipitation experiments using the FLAG antibody. Beads samples were incubated in the reaction buffer (1% SDC/100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5/10 mM TCEP/40 mM CAA) at 95 °C for 10 min for protein denaturation, cysteine reduction and alkylation. The eluates were diluted with equal volume of H2O and subjected to trypsin digestion overnight by adding trypsin at a ratio of 1:50 (enzyme: protein, w/w) for overnight digestion at 37 °C. The next day, TFA was used to bring the pH down to 6.0 to end the digestion. After centrifugation (12000×g, 15 min), The peptide was purified using self-made SDB desalting columns. The eluate was vacuum dried and stored at −20 °C for later use. Mass spectrometry (MS) data acquisition was carried out on a Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer coupled with UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano system. Peptides were loaded through auto-sampler and separated in a C18 analytical column (75μm × 25cm, C18, 1.9μm, 100Å). Mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid) and mobile phase B (80% ACN, 0.1% formic acid) were used to establish the separation gradient. A constant flow rate was set at 300 nL/min. For DDA mode analysis, each scan cycle is consisted of one full-scan mass spectrum (R = 60 K, AGC = 3e6, max IT = 20 ms, scan range = 350–1800 m/z) followed by 20 MS/MS events (R = 15 K, AGC = 2e5, max IT = 50 ms). HCD collision energy was set to 28. Isolation window for precursor selection was set to 1.6 Da. Former target ion exclusion was set for 30 s. MS raw data were analyzed with MaxQuant (V1.6.6) using the Andromeda database search algorithm. Spectra files were searched against Human database (2022-03-29,20377 entries) using the following parameters: LFQ mode was checked for quantification; Variable modifications, Oxidation (M), Acetyl (Protein N-term) & Deamidation (NQ); Fixed modifications, Carbamidomethyl (C); Digestion, Trypsin/P; The MS1 match tolerance was set as 20 ppm for the first search and 4.5 ppm for the main search; the MS2 tolerance was set as 20 ppm. Search results were filtered with 1% FDR at both protein and peptide levels. Proteins denoted as decoy hits, contaminants, or only identified by sites were removed, the remaining identifications were used for further quantification analysis. Proteins with a fold change > 4 between bait IP and control were screened out as interactors of the bait protein.
Preparation of Cdh26 siRNA encapsulated lipid nanoparticles
Cdh26 siRNA encapsulated lipid nanoparticles were prepared by Cynbio (Shanghai, China). The preparation method is as follows: Cdh26 siRNA was dissolved in RNase-Free water. For the aqueous phase, a siRNA working solution was prepared using 100 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.0), with a concentration of 0.35 mg/mL. For the organic phase, a lipid mixture was prepared in anhydrous ethanol at a concentration of 25 mM, with the following composition: DLin-MC3-DMA: DSPC: Cholesterol: DMPE-PEG2000 = 50:10:38.5:1.5. The encapsulation of Cdh26 siRNA into lipids was performed using the PNI Ignite instrument with the Ignite microfluidic chip, at a total flow rate of 12 mL/min and a water-to-organic ratio of 3:1. After encapsulation, the nanoparticles were diluted with 10 times the volume of DPBS (calcium and magnesium free). The diluted mixture was then centrifuged at 4°C and 3000 g for 30 minutes using a 100 kDa ultrafiltration tube, until the volume before dilution was reached. The buffer was replaced with DPBS three times, achieving a displacement rate of 99%. A sucrose solution of the corresponding concentration was prepared using DPBS, and the Cdh26 siRNA encapsulated lipid nanoparticles were diluted with a 5% sucrose solution. The encapsulation efficiency, particle size, PDI, and zeta potential were measured. Finally, the Cdh26 siRNA encapsulated lipid nanoparticles were stored at −80°C.
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was conducted using Prism version 8 (GraphPad Software). For normally distributed data, we calculated the means ±standard deviation (SD) and performed parametric tests such as Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test for group comparisons. For non-normally distributed data, we calculated medians with interquartile ranges and utilized non-parametric tests, such as the Mann-Whitney test. Spearman correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
Supplementary Figures
A-D) CDH26, CD206, FIZZ1 and CCL17 transcript levels in induced sputum cells from asthma patients (n=32) and control subjects (n=14) were measured by quantitative PCR. The transcript levels were expressed as log2 transformed and relative to the mean value for control group. E) Spearman’s correlation assays between CDH26 transcripts in BAL cells and serum IgE of asthma patients. F) The expression of CCL17 in induced sputum array data (GSE76262). G) Spearman’s correlation assays between CDH26 and CCL17 expression levels in asthma patients in induced sputum array data. Data are mean ±SD. *p<0.05; **p<0.01. Abbreviations: CDH26, cadherin-26; CD206, mannose receptor C-Type 1; Fizz1, found in inflammatory zone 1; CCL17, C-C motif chemokine ligand 17.
A) Representative images of H&E staining in mouse lung sections (scale bar = 50 μm). B) The inflammatory score was graded in four random fields for each lung section at 200× magnification. C) Cell counts for macrophages, eosinophils, lymphocytes and neutrophils in BALF. n=8-10 mice per group. Data are mean ±SD. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Abbreviations: H&E staining, hematoxylin-eosin staining; PAS staining, periodic acid-schiff staining; BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.
A) Representative images for co-immunofluorescence staining of Cdh26 (green) and Il-4Rα (red) in BALF from mouse (scale bar = 50 μm). Nuclei was stained with DAPI (blue). B) The numbers of Cdh26+/ Il-4Rα+ cells in BALF were performed using ImageJ. C-H) The mRNA levels of Arg1, Cd206, Fizz1, Ym1, Ccl22 and Ccl17 in mouse lungs measured by quantitative PCR. The transcript levels were expressed as log2 transformed and relative to the mean value for control group. I) Representative images for co-immunofluorescence staining of Cd68 (green) and Cd206 (red) in BALF from mouse (scale bar = 50 μm). n=8-10 mice per group. Data are mean ± SD. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Abbreviations: Cd68, Cd68 molecule; Cd206, mannose receptor C-type 1; Arg1, arginase-1; YM1, also named as Chil3, chitinase-like protein 3; Fizz1, found in inflammatory zone 1; Ccl17, C-C motif chemokine ligand 17; Ccl22, C-C motif chemokine ligand 22; Il-4Rα, lnterleukin-4 receptor subunit alpha.
A) Construction strategies for Cdh26fl/ fl Lyz2Cre mice. B) Breeding strategies for Cdh26fl/ fl Lyz2Cre mice. C) Genetic identification Cdh26fl/ fl Lyz2Cre mice. D) Gating strategies for flow cytometry. Abbreviations: Cd45, Cd45 antigen; Cd11b, Cd11 antigen-like family member b; Cd206, mannose receptor C-type 1.
A) Representative images of masson staining in mouse lung sections (scale bar = 50 μm). B) The area of masson trichrome stain were measured by ImageJ software. Data are mean ± SD. **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.
A-C) Primary culture of BMDMs were stimulated with Il-4 or LPS for 48h. The mRNA levels of Cdh26, Cd206 and Ym1 were determined by quantitative PCR. D-E) Primary culture of mouse pulmonary macrophages were stimulated with Il-4 or LPS for 48h. The mRNA levels of Cdh26, Cd206 and Ym1 were determined by quantitative PCR. G-I) Primary culture of BMDMs were stimulated with Il-4 or Il-13 for 48h. The mRNA levels of Cdh26, Cd206 and Ym1 were determined by quantitative PCR. The transcript levels were expressed as log2 transformed and relative to the mean value for control group. Data are mean ± SD. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Abbreviations: Cdh26, cadherin-26; Cd206, mannose receptor C-type 1; YM1, also named as Chil3, chitinase-like protein 3; LPS, lipopolysaccharides.
A) Primary culture of BMDM cells were stimulated with Il-4 for 48h. The mRNA levels of Cdh26 were determined by quantitative PCR. The transcript levels were expressed as log2 transformed and relative to the mean value for control group. B-C) The protein levels of Cdh26 in BMDM cells after exposure to Il-4 for 48h were determined by western blotting. Densitometry assay was performed using ImageJ, and Cdh26 protein levels were indexed to Gapdh. D-F). The protein levels of Arg1, Cd206 in BMDM cells after exposure to Il-4 for 48h were determined by western blotting. Densitometry assay was performed using ImageJ, and Arg1, Cd206 protein levels were indexed to Actb. G-I) The mRNA levels of Arg1, Cd206 and Fizz1 were determined by quantitative PCR. The transcript levels were expressed as log2 transformed and relative to the mean value for control group. Data are mean ± SD. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Abbreviations: Cdh26, cadherin-26; BMDM, bone marrow derived macrophage; Cd206, mannose receptor C-type 1; Arg1, arginase-1; Fizz1, found in inflammatory zone 1; Actb, actin beta; Gapdh, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
A-E) The mRNA levels of Arg1, Cd206 and Fizz1, Ccl17 and Ccl22 were determined by quantitative PCR. The transcript levels were expressed as log2 transformed and relative to the mean value for control group. Data are mean ± SD. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Abbreviations: Arg1, arginase-1; Cd206, mannose receptor C-type 1; Fizz1, found in inflammatory zone 1; Ccl17, C-C motif chemokine ligand 17; Ccl22, C-C motif chemokine ligand 22, Actb, actin beta.
A) The peptide length distribution of mass spectrometry analysis. B) The mass deviation distribution plot of mass spectrometry analysis.
WT mice were treated with NC siRNA@LNPs + Saline, NC siRNA@LNPs + OVA, Cdh26 siRNA@LNPs + Saline or Cdh26 siRNA@LNPs + OVA, respectively. Representative images for H&E staining of major organs including liver spleen and kidney. n=8-10 mice per group.
A-C) Primary culture of BMDM cells were stimulated with Il-4 for 48h, and ruxolitinib was administered as an intervention 2 h ago. The protein levels of Cdh26, Cd206 were determined by western blotting. Densitometry assay was performed using ImageJ, and Cdh26, Cd206 protein levels were indexed to Gapdh. Data are mean ± SD. *p<0.05; ***p<0.001. Abbreviations: Cdh26, cadherin-26; Cd206, mannose receptor C-type 1; Actb, actin beta.
Footnotes
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 82170036), Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province (grant 2024BCB280), Innovation and Translation Project of Tongji Hospital (grant 2023CXZH006), Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2024AFB622), Research Foundation of Tongji Hospital (2023B06)
Reference
