Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Comparing Three Evidence-Based Strategies to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Burden: An Individual-Based Cardiometabolic Policy Simulation

View ORCID ProfileSylvia Lutze, Steve Bachmeier, Alison Bowman, Nicole DeCleene, Hussain Jafari, Matthew Kappel, Caroline Kinuthia, Paulina Lindstedt, Megan Lindstrom, Rajan Mudambi, View ORCID ProfileChristian Razo, Kjell Swedin, Abraham Flaxman, View ORCID ProfileGregory Roth
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.01.24311387
Sylvia Lutze
1Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sylvia Lutze
  • For correspondence: lutzes{at}uw.edu
Steve Bachmeier
1Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alison Bowman
1Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicole DeCleene
1Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hussain Jafari
1Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Kappel
1Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Kinuthia
1Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paulina Lindstedt
1Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan Lindstrom
1Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rajan Mudambi
1Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Razo
1Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
2Department of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christian Razo
Kjell Swedin
1Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abraham Flaxman
1Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
2Department of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle
3Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory Roth
1Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
2Department of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle
4Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gregory Roth
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

• Background Understanding the real-world impact of clinical trials is important for informing health care policy. This is particularly true when trials are designed to show changes in surrogate endpoints such as changes in risk factors rather than events or mortality. We developed an agent-based microsimulation that estimates the population-level benefits in each US state for cardiometabolic health interventions shown to improve risk factors.

• Methods We designed a large-scale, location-specific agent-based simulation model with a population of 51 million in silico individuals and estimated results for the years 2023 to 2040 in 30-day steps for each of the 50 states and District of Columbia. Input data reflected current cardiometabolic health in each state and the effects of interventions and risk factors on outcomes. We constructed three health policy intervention scenarios based on successful randomized controlled trials designed to improve cardiometabolic population health: improved access to fixed-dose combination (FDC) antihypertensive medication, a pharmacist-led intervention to increase adherence to statin and antihypertensives medications at the time they are initiated (Pharmacy), and a community-based lifestyle and behavior intervention designed to prevent diabetes (Community). Outcomes included myocardial infarction, ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure, and ischemic stroke events, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).

• Results Our simulation included a representative population of the United States, accurate at the age, sex, and state level, with individual people simulated over 17 years. By the year 2040, the FDC intervention was estimated to have prevented 776,000 (95% UI 578,000– 956,000) CVD DALYs and 44,600 (95% UI 32,700–55,600) deaths annually. Reductions in ischemic heart disease deaths accounted for 76.5% of the total reductions in CVD deaths. The Pharmacist intervention prevented 170,000 (95% UI 129,000–208,000) CVD DALYs, and the Community intervention prevented 152,000 (95% UI 128,000–173,000) CVD DALYs.

• Conclusions A fixed-dose combination of antihypertensives could prevent 1.2% of total CVD DALYs, with smaller benefits from adherence and lifestyle-focused programs and impact of interventions varying by state. The greatest reduction was in incident myocardial infarctions and ischemic heart disease deaths. Providing accurate population-level estimates at the state level can help local health policy decision-makers implement the most impactful interventions.

Clinical Perspective What is new?

  • Using person-level simulation, we have translated randomized trial results showing improvements in blood pressure, BMI, fasting plasma glucose, and LDL-C, and adherence to medication into real-world impact including forecasting cardiovascular disease events and deaths for the United States through the year 2040.

  • A national, agent-based microsimulation for all 50 US states and DC allows us to assess how risk factor interventions will differentially affect demographic groups and locations.

What are the clinical implications?

  • Broad adoption of fixed-dose combination medication for hypertension had the largest health benefit in all states.

  • Interventions to improve adherence to medications or promote behavior change led to smaller reductions in disease burden.

  • Direct comparison of the estimated real-world impact of clinical and community-based interventions can guide ongoing efforts to reduce the population burden of cardiovascular disease and resulting disparities.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The funders had little input into the design, data, or modeling decisions. They have not read of contributed to this paper.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

N/A This is a simulation study and used only existing data sources.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • ↵* Co-senior authors

Data Availability

The dataset generated for use during the current study is available in the ihmeuw/vivarium_nih_us_cvd repository, the link for the simulation data is: https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10671674

https://github.com/ihmeuw/vivarium_nih_us_cvd

https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10671674

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 03, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparing Three Evidence-Based Strategies to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Burden: An Individual-Based Cardiometabolic Policy Simulation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparing Three Evidence-Based Strategies to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Burden: An Individual-Based Cardiometabolic Policy Simulation
Sylvia Lutze, Steve Bachmeier, Alison Bowman, Nicole DeCleene, Hussain Jafari, Matthew Kappel, Caroline Kinuthia, Paulina Lindstedt, Megan Lindstrom, Rajan Mudambi, Christian Razo, Kjell Swedin, Abraham Flaxman, Gregory Roth
medRxiv 2024.08.01.24311387; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.01.24311387
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comparing Three Evidence-Based Strategies to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Burden: An Individual-Based Cardiometabolic Policy Simulation
Sylvia Lutze, Steve Bachmeier, Alison Bowman, Nicole DeCleene, Hussain Jafari, Matthew Kappel, Caroline Kinuthia, Paulina Lindstedt, Megan Lindstrom, Rajan Mudambi, Christian Razo, Kjell Swedin, Abraham Flaxman, Gregory Roth
medRxiv 2024.08.01.24311387; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.01.24311387

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)