Abstract
This retrospective cohort study evaluated the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of two bivalent (Original/Omicron BA.4/BA.5) vaccines mRNA-1273.222 versus BNT162b2 Bivalent in preventing COVID-19-related outcomes in adults with underlying medical conditions associated with increased risk for severe COVID-19.
In a linked EHR-claims dataset, US adults (≥18 years) with ≥1 underlying medical condition of interest who received either bivalent vaccine between August 31, 2022, and February 28, 2023, were identified. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for cohort differences. Cohorts were followed up for COVID-19-related hospitalizations and outpatient encounters until May 31, 2023. Hazard ratios and rVEs were estimated using Cox regression. Subgroup analyses were performed on individuals with pre-specified comorbid conditions.
757,572 mRNA-1273.222 and 1,204,975 BNT162b2 Bivalent recipients were identified. The adjusted rVE over a median follow-up of 198 days was 10.9% (6.2%-15.2%) against COVID-19-related hospitalization and 3.2% (1.7%-4.7%) against COVID-19-related outpatient encounters. rVE estimates for COVID-19 hospitalizations among subgroups with comorbid conditions were: diabetes 15.1% (8.7%–21.0%), cardiovascular disease 14.7% (9.0%–20.1%), chronic lung disease 11.9% (5.1%–18.2%), immunocompromised 15.0% (7.2%–22.2%), chronic kidney disease 8.4% (0.5%–15.7%).
Overall, among adults with underlying medical conditions, mRNA-1273.222 was more effective than BNT162b2 Bivalent, especially in preventing COVID-19-related hospitalizations.
Competing Interest Statement
H.K., D.B.E., M. B-J., E. B., and J. M. are employees of and shareholders in Moderna Inc. A.B., J.P.W-J., N.Z., I.H.W., and M.B. are employees of Veradigm, which was contracted by Moderna and received fees for data management and statistical analyses. V.H.N., C.B., and T.D., are employees of VHN Consulting, which was contracted by Moderna to help conduct this analysis.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Moderna Inc. via a contract with Veradigm.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
As a noninterventional, retrospective database study using a certified Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant deidentified research database, approval by an institutional review board was not necessary.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study were used under license from Veradigm and Komodo Health. Due to data use agreements and its proprietary nature, restrictions apply regarding the availability of the data. Further information is available from the corresponding author.
