Abstract
Background Comorbidity and heterogeneity in psychiatric disorders may stem from a general psychopathology (p) factor influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Although the relative contributions of these influences on psychopathology are established, the longitudinal associations between p-factor and specific environmental exposures across development are not well understood. Using a longitudinal genetically informative design, this study investigates the association between the home environment and p-factor across childhood.
Methods Data were obtained from the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS). Cross-lagged panel analyses were conducted separately to ascertain the direction of associations between parent-rated p, self-rated p, and self-rated home environment (chaos at home and parental discipline) at ages 9, 12, and 16 (N=6,213). Biometric autoregressive cross-lagged twin models were used to assess the aetiology of these associations, and MZ differences analyses were used to control for familial effects.
Results Both latent factors were stable over time, although twin-rated p-factor (r = 0.44-0.40) was more variable than parent-rated p-factor (r = 0.72-0.63). ‘Home environment’ was more variable than p-factor uniformly. Small, significant bi-directional associations were found between p-factor and home environment, with stronger cross-lagged paths from p-factor to home environment than vice versa. These longitudinal associations persisted over time, though attenuated for parent-rated p-factor. Genetic analyses revealed that bi-directional cross-lagged paths were largely explained by shared environmental factors, with a smaller proportion explained by genetic factors. This pattern of results was confirmed in MZ differences analyses.
Conclusions Our findings suggest a dynamic and bidirectional relationship between p-factor and the home environment across development, predominantly influenced by shared environmental factors. Changes in one can influence the other, highlighting the complexity of psychopathology’s environmental influences. This underscores the need for further investigation into gene-environment interplay to inform approaches to psychopathology prevention and intervention.
Key points and relevance
The relationship between p-factor and the home environment is dynamic and bidirectional, indicating that changes in one can influence the other across different developmental stages. However, the effect sizes of these relationships were modest.
Shared environmental factors played a major role in driving cross-lagged associations between p-factor and the home environment, with some genetic contribution, suggesting that the family environment can significantly shape this relationship.
These findings necessitate deeper investigations into gene-environment interplay in shaping psychopathology. A better understanding of these dynamics could inform effective prevention and intervention strategies for developmental psychopathology.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
We gratefully acknowledge the ongoing contribution of the participants in the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS) and their families. TEDS is supported by a programme Grant to R.P. from the UK Medical Research Council (Grant Nos. MR/V012878/1 and previously MR/M021475/1), with additional support from the US National Institutes of Health (Grant No. AG046938). The research leading to these results has also received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ grant agreement no 602768. Project approval was granted by the IoPPN DClinPsy programme team on 20th March 2020. A Twins Early Development Study (TEDS) data request was approved on 14th July 2020. This required pre-registration on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/2xgtd/).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Written informed consent was obtained from parents before data collection and from TEDS participants themselves past the age of 18. King's College London's Ethics Committee approved the project for the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience PNM/09/10-104.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
For information on data availability, please see the TEDS data access policy. All relevant data are available from the authors according to the TEDS data access policy.
http://www.teds.ac.uk/research/collaborators-and-data/teds-data-access-policy
