Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

An extension of the Benefit Risk Assessment of VaccinEs (BRAVE) Toolkit to evaluate Comirnaty and Spikevax vaccination in the European Union

View ORCID ProfileNeilshan Loedy, Hector G Dorta, Steven Abrams, Jonas Crèvecoeur, Daniel R. Morales, Catherine Cohet, Lander Willem, Geert Molenberghs, Niel Hens, Xavier Kurz, Chantal Quinten, Johan Verbeeck
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.09.24311669
Neilshan Loedy
1Data Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Neilshan Loedy
  • For correspondence: neilshan.loedy{at}uhasselt.be
Hector G Dorta
2European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Abrams
1Data Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
3Global Health Institute (GHI), Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonas Crèvecoeur
1Data Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel R. Morales
2European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Cohet
2European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lander Willem
4Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling of Infectious Diseases (CHERMID), Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
5Primary and interdisciplinary care (ELIZA), Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geert Molenberghs
1Data Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
6I-Biostat, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Niel Hens
1Data Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
4Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling of Infectious Diseases (CHERMID), Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xavier Kurz
2European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chantal Quinten
2European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johan Verbeeck
1Data Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Amid the global COVID-19 pandemic, vaccines were conditionally authorised for human use to protect against severe infection. The BRAVE toolkit, a user-friendly R Shiny application, was developed retrospectively together with the European Medicine Agency (EMA) with the aim of fulfilling the need for flexible tools to assess vaccine benefits and risks during and outside a pandemic situation.

Method This study employed BRAVE to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines across 30 EU/EEA countries by quantifying the number of prevented clinical events (i.e., confirmed infections, hospitalisations, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and deaths), using a probabilistic model informed by real-time incidence data and vaccine effectiveness estimates. The analysis assumes fixed population dynamics and behaviour. Additionally, BRAVE assesses risks associated with mRNA-based vaccines (myocarditis or pericarditis) by comparing observed incidence rates in vaccinated individuals with background incidence rates.

Results mRNA vaccines were estimated to directly prevent 11.150 million (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 10.876 – 11.345) confirmed COVID-19 infections, 0.739 million (95% CI: 0.727 – 0.744) COVID-19 hospitalisations, 0.107 million (95% CI: 0.104 – 0.109) ICU admissions, and 0.187 million (95% CI: 0.182 – 0.189) COVID-19-related deaths in the EU/EEA between 13 December 2020 and 31 December 2021. Despite increased vaccination-associated myocarditis or pericarditis observed in younger men, the benefits of vaccination still outweigh these risks.

Conclusion Our study supports the benefit/risk profile of COVID-19 vaccines and emphasises the utility of employing a flexible toolkit to assess risks and benefits of vaccination. This user-friendly and adaptable toolkit can serve as a blueprint for similar tools, enhancing preparedness for future public health crises.

Competing Interest Statement

HGD, DRM, CC, XK and CQ were employees of the European Medicines Agency at the time of elaboration of this work and have no conflict of interest. HGD is a co-founder and holds stock options in Rynd Biotech, a startup company for the rapid detection of sexually transmitted infections. NH holds a grant sponsored by MSD, Janssen Vaccines & Prevention, GSK (Glaxo SmithKline), and has received consulting fees for his participation in the advisory board for Janssen Global Services, and payment for expert testimony for MSD. LW and SA are PIs of a research project on COVID-19 modelling funded by the Research Foundation; Flanders (FWO Belgium, G059423N). GM declares its participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for COVID-19 vaccine trials of Janssen Pharmaceutica. These potential conflicts of interest have not influenced the design, conduct, or reporting of the work presented in this manuscript. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Funding Statement

This work received funding from the European Medicines Agency under the framework service contract EMA/2017/09/PE (lot 1).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Target journal: Eurosurveillance.

Data Availability

The default datasets can be accessed in the BRAVE toolkit. The full study protocol and report related to this study can be consulted at EUPAS4429. Upon request to the authors, the source code behind the BRAVE toolkit can be provided.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 09, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An extension of the Benefit Risk Assessment of VaccinEs (BRAVE) Toolkit to evaluate Comirnaty and Spikevax vaccination in the European Union
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
An extension of the Benefit Risk Assessment of VaccinEs (BRAVE) Toolkit to evaluate Comirnaty and Spikevax vaccination in the European Union
Neilshan Loedy, Hector G Dorta, Steven Abrams, Jonas Crèvecoeur, Daniel R. Morales, Catherine Cohet, Lander Willem, Geert Molenberghs, Niel Hens, Xavier Kurz, Chantal Quinten, Johan Verbeeck
medRxiv 2024.08.09.24311669; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.09.24311669
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
An extension of the Benefit Risk Assessment of VaccinEs (BRAVE) Toolkit to evaluate Comirnaty and Spikevax vaccination in the European Union
Neilshan Loedy, Hector G Dorta, Steven Abrams, Jonas Crèvecoeur, Daniel R. Morales, Catherine Cohet, Lander Willem, Geert Molenberghs, Niel Hens, Xavier Kurz, Chantal Quinten, Johan Verbeeck
medRxiv 2024.08.09.24311669; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.09.24311669

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Informatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)