ABSTRACT
Background While studies have investigated the availability of Medical College Hospitals (MCHs) in India, data on geographical accessibility is limited. Our study looks at the current geographical accessibility to these MCHs across 36 states and union territories (UTs) and 735 districts.
Methods and Findings We provided and validated the MCH data acquired from the National Health Profile Report 2022. We took motorized and walking travel-time friction surface rasters from the Malaria Atlas Project 2019 and high-resolution population estimates from WorldPop 2020. Using these, we examined the density of MCHs per million population and the median travel time to the nearest MCH. We assessed the Access Population Coverage (APC), defined as the proportion of the population within 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes by motorized transport and within 30 and 60 minutes from the nearest MCH by walking.
In 2022, India had an average density of 0.47 MCHs per million. The median travel time to the nearest MCH was 67.94 minutes by motorized transport and 589.82 minutes by walking. 71.76% of the population could access the nearest MCH by motorized transport within 60 minutes (range across districts: 0-100%). 4.22% of the population could access the nearest MCH by walking within 30 minutes (range across districts: 0-71.86%). The APC was 62.20% within 60 minutes by motorized transport in rural vs. 92.34% in urban areas. The APC within 60 minutes by motorized transport for public MCHs was 63.62%, while that for private was 45.95%. These estimates do not account for resource availability at the hospitals or vehicular ownership in the population.
Conclusions Median travel time and APC are useful for assessing geographical accessibility. Our study found a wide disparity in MCH access across Indian states and rural vs. urban areas. These analyses can guide the optimal placement of new MCHs.
Competing Interest Statement
Siddhesh Zadey represents the Association for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR) on the drafting committee of the Maharashtra State Mental Health Policy and the Global Alliance for Surgical, Obstetric, Trauma, and Anesthesia Care (G4 Alliance). He serves as the chair of the South Asia Working Group of the G4 Alliance. He is on the board of ASAR and the advisory board of Nivarana. He has previously received honoraria from Think Global Health and The Hindu. Other authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
