Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Survey: Accessibility of At-Home COVID-19 Tests for Users with Disabilities

Sarah Farmer, Amanda Peagler, Rebecca Sheiner, Adina Martinez, Victoria Razin
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.13.24311938
Sarah Farmer
1Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sarah.farmer{at}cacp.gatech.edu
Amanda Peagler
1Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Sheiner
1Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adina Martinez
1Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victoria Razin
2Georgia Tech Research Institute
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

2 Abstract

Widespread access to over-the-counter at-home COVID-19 tests was a crucial component of the United States’ public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic. For at-home testing to be effective, it is essential for the tests to be not only available but also usable and accessible to people with disabilities. In the present study, a survey was conducted to collect feedback about people’s experiences using over-the-counter COVID-19 tests, with an aim to identify barriers to the accessibility of COVID-19 tests for people with disabilities. Survey respondents self-identified as having little to no vision, low vision, or limited dexterity. The survey covered ten at-home COVID-19 test brands. For each test that a respondent had used, the survey included questions about whether the user was able to complete the test independently or whether they needed assistance, the ease of use for performing each part of the testing procedure, and any difficulties that the user encountered while using the test. The survey also included questions for each test regarding the use of mobile applications, digital instructions, and customer service. This report presents the results of nearly 400 responses to the accessibility survey. The results offer an improved understanding of accessibility barriers for at-home COVID-19 tests; designers of at-home diagnostic tests can apply this knowledge in order to improve the accessibility of over-the-counter COVID-19 tests and other at-home diagnostic tests to people with disabilities.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work is supported by NIH grants U54 EB027690 02S1 and U54 EB027690 05S1. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Office of Research Integrity Assurance of Georgia Institute of Technology waived ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 14, 2024.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Survey: Accessibility of At-Home COVID-19 Tests for Users with Disabilities
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Survey: Accessibility of At-Home COVID-19 Tests for Users with Disabilities
Sarah Farmer, Amanda Peagler, Rebecca Sheiner, Adina Martinez, Victoria Razin
medRxiv 2024.08.13.24311938; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.13.24311938
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Survey: Accessibility of At-Home COVID-19 Tests for Users with Disabilities
Sarah Farmer, Amanda Peagler, Rebecca Sheiner, Adina Martinez, Victoria Razin
medRxiv 2024.08.13.24311938; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.13.24311938

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)